| Literature DB >> 33269076 |
Valentina V Miroshnikova1, Olga V Romanova2,3, Olga N Ivanova4, Mikhail A Fedyakov2, Alexandra A Panteleeva1,5,6,7, Yury A Barbitoff3,7, Maria V Muzalevskaya8,9, Sorejya A Urazgildeeva8,9, Victor S Gurevich8,9, Stanislav P Urazov2, Sergey G Scherbak2, Andrey M Sarana9, Natalia A Semenova4, Inga V Anisimova4, Darya M Guseva4, Sofya N Pchelina1,5,6, Andrey S Glotov2,3, Ekaterina Y Zakharova4, Oleg S Glotov2,3.
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is caused by mutations in various genes, including the LDLR, APOB and PSCK9 genes; however, the spectrum of these mutations in Russian individuals has not been fully investigated. In the present study, mutation screening was performed on the LDLR gene and other FH-associated genes in patients with definite or possible FH, using next-generation sequencing. In total, 59 unrelated patients were recruited and sorted into two separate groups depending on their age: Adult (n=31; median age, 49; age range, 23-70) and children/adolescent (n=28; median age, 11; age range, 2-21). FH-associated variants were identified in 18 adults and 25 children, demonstrating mutation detection rates of 58 and 89% for the adult and children/adolescent groups, respectively. In the adult group, 13 patients had FH-associated mutations in the LDLR gene, including two novel variants [NM_000527.4: c.433_434dupG p.(Val145Glyfs*35) and c.1186G>C p.(Gly396Arg)], 3 patients had APOB mutations and two had ABCG5/G8 mutations. In the children/adolescent group, 21 patients had FH-causing mutations in the LDLR gene, including five novel variants [NM_000527.4: c.325T>G p.(Cys109Gly), c.401G>C p.(Cys134Ser), c.616A>C p.(Ser206Arg), c.1684_1691delTGGCCCAA p.(Pro563Hisfs*14) and c.940+1_c.940+4delGTGA], and 2 patients had APOB mutations, as well as ABCG8 and LIPA mutations, being found in different patients. The present study reported seven novel LDLR variants considered to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Among them, four missense variants were located in the coding regions, which corresponded to functional protein domains, and two frameshifts were identified that produced truncated proteins. These variants were observed only once in different patients, whereas a splicing variant in intron 6 (c.940+1_c.940+4delGTGA) was detected in four unrelated individuals. Previously reported variants in the LDLR, APOB, ABCG5/8 and LIPA genes were observed in 33 patients. The LDLR p.(Gly592Glu) variant was detected in 6 patients, representing 10% of the FH cases reported in the present study, thus it may be a major variant present in the Russian population. In conclusion, the present study identified seven novel variants of the LDLR gene and broadens the spectrum of mutations in FH-related genes in the Russian Federation. Copyright: © Miroshnikova et al.Entities:
Keywords: LDLR; familial hypercholesterolemia; next generation sequencing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33269076 PMCID: PMC7694592 DOI: 10.3892/br.2020.1391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Rep ISSN: 2049-9434
Clinicopathological and demographic characteristics of the recruited cohort.
| Characteristic | Adult, n=31 | Children/adolescent, n=28 |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years[ | 47.4±14.1 | 11.0±5.1 |
| Age range, years | 23-70 | 2-21 |
| Male, n (%) | 12(39) | 17(61) |
| Female, n (%) | 19(61) | 11(39) |
| Family history, n (%) | 23(74) | 24(86) |
| Maximal total cholesterol, mmol/l[ | 11.0±2.2 | 9.3±1.4 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/l[ | 6.8±2.5 | 6.7±1.8 |
| Tendon xanthomas, n (%) | 22(71) | 0 (0) |
| Lipoic corneal arcus, n (%) | 2(6) | 0 (0) |
| Clinical and instrumental manifestations of ASCVD, n (%) | 17(55) | 0 (0) |
| Increased intima-media thickness without clinical symptoms, n (%) | 3(10) | 0 (0) |
| Patients on lipid-lowering therapy, n (%) | 31(100) | 1(4) |
aMean ± standard deviation. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; LDL, low density lipoprotein.
Characterization of genetic variants identified in the present study and their pathogenicity analysis.
| A, Novel[ | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient ID | Genetic variant | Number of patients | Variant ID in dbSNP or alternative database | Genomic position (GCRh37/hg19) | Pathogenicity analysis[ | Functional domain | Pathogenicity[ | SIFT | Mutation taster | Poly Phen2 | (Refs.) |
| 1 | Missense Exon 4 c.325T>G p.(Cys109Gly) | 1 | 869387 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11215907 | - | Ligand-binding | Likely pathogenic (PS1 PM1 PM2 PM5 PP3) | D | D | D | - |
| 2 | Missense Exon 4 c.401G>C p.(Cys134Ser) | 1 | 869388 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11215983 | - | Ligand-binding | Likely pathogenic (PS1 PM1 PM2 PM5 PP3) | D | D | D | - |
| 3 | Frameshift Exon 4 c.433_434dupG p.(Val145Glyfs*35) | 1 | 870329 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11216013 | - | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic (PVS1 PM2 PP3) | D | D | -- | - |
| 4 | Missense Exon 4 c.616A>C p.(Ser206Arg) | 1 | 869389 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11216198 | - | Ligand-binding | Uncertain value (PM2 PP3) | D | D | D | - |
| 5 | c.940+1_c.940+ 4 delGTGA (g.18154_18157 delGTGA) | 4 | 869390 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11218191-11218194 | - | Splice donor site, intron 6 | Pathogenic (PVS1 PM1 PM2 PP3) | -- | D | -- | - |
| 6 | Missense Exon 8 c.1186G>C p.(Gly396Arg) | 1 | 870321 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11222315 | - | EGF precursor homology B repeat | Pathogenic (PVS1 PM1 PM2 PM5 PP3) | D | D | D | - |
| 7 | Frameshift Exon 11 c.1684_1691del TGGCCCAA p.(Pro563Hisfs*14) | 1 | 869391 in ClinVar | Chr19: 11226866-11226875 | - | EGF spacer | Pathogenic (PVS1 PM1 PM2 PP3) | D | D | -- | - |
| B, Genetic variants in | |||||||||||
| 8 | Missense Exon 2 c.100T>G p.(Cys34Gly) | 1 | rs879254405 | Chr19: 11210931 | - | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 9 | Frameshift Exon 4 c.316_328delCCC AAGACGTGCT p.(Lys107Argfs*95) | 1 | LDLR_001035 in LOVD database | Chr19: 11215901-11215915 | - | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic | D | D | -- | ( |
| 10 | Missense Exon 4 c.552T>G p.(Cys184Trp) | 1 | LDLR_000858 in LOVD database | Chr19: 11216134 | - | Ligand-binding | Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 11 | Missense Exon 5 c.798T>A p.(Asp266Glu)[ | 1 | rs139043155 | Chr19: 11217344 | 0.000032 | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | D | D | - | ( |
| 12 | Missense Exon 6 c.887G>A p.(Cys296Tyr) | 1 | rs879254707 | Chr19: 11218137 | - | Ligand-binding | Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 13 | Nonsense Exon 6 c.888C>A p.(Cys296*) | 1 | rs879254708 | Chr19: 11218138 | - | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic | D | D | -- | ( |
| 14 | Missense Exon 6 c.938 G>A p.(Cys313Tyr) | 1 | rs875989910 | Chr19: 11218188 | - | Ligand-binding | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 15 | Missense Exon 7 c.986G>A p.(Cys329Tyr)[ | 2 | rs761954844 | Chr19: 11221373 | 0.000016 | EGF precursor homology repeat A | Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 16 | Nonsense Exon 7 c.1048C>T p.(Arg350*) | 1 | rs769737896 | Chr19: 11221435 | - | EGF precursor homology repeat A | Pathogenic | D | D | -- | ( |
| 17 | c.1186+1G>T | 1 | rs730880131 | Chr19: 11222316 | - | Splice donor site‡, intron 8 | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | -- | D | -- | - |
| 18 | Missense Exon 9 c.1202T>A p.(Leu401His) | 3 | rs121908038 | Chr19: 11223969 | - | EGF spacer | Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 19 | Missense Exon 9 c.1277 T>C p.(Leu426Pro) | 1 | rs879254851 | Chr19: 11224044 | - | EGF spacer | Pathogenic/ conflicting- interpretations-of- pathogenicity | D | D | B | ( |
| 20 | Frameshift Exon 10 c.1478_1479delCT p.(Ser493Cysfs*42) | 1 | rs869025453 | Chr19: 11113652-11113655 | 0.00003 | EGF spacer | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | -- | D | -- | ( |
| 21 | Missense Exon 12 c.1730G>C p.(Trp577Ser) | 1 | rs138947766 | Chr19: 11227559 | 0.000008 | EGF spacer | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 22 | Missense Exon 12 c.1775G>A p.(Gly592Glu) | 6 | rs137929307 | Chr19: 11227604 | 0.000044 | EGF spacer | Pathogenic/ Likely pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 23 | Nonsense Exon 15 c.2230C>T p.(Arg744*) | 1 | rs200793488 | Chr19: 11233939 | 0.000004 | O-linked sugars | Pathogenic | D | D | - | ( |
| C, Genetic variants in | |||||||||||
| 24 | Missense Exon 26 c.9175C>T p.(Arg3059Cys)[ | 1 | rs146377316 | Chr2: 21230565 | 0.000008 | LDLR binding | Unknown significance | B | B | B | ( |
| 25 | Missense Exon 26 c.10580G>A p.(Arg3527Gln)[ | 1 | rs5742904 | Chr2: 21229160 | 0.000275 | LDLR binding | Pathogenic | B | D | D | ( |
| 26 | Missense Exon 26 c.10580G>T p.(Arg3527Leu) | 1 | rs5742904 | Chr2: 21229160 | - | LDLR binding | Pathogenic | D | D | D | ( |
| 27 | In-frame deletion Exon 29 c.13480_ 13482delCAG p.(Gln4494del)[ | 2 | rs562574661 | Chr2: 21001940-21001945 | 0.000384 | - | Likely pathogenic/ conflicting- interpretations-of- pathogenicity | - | B | - | ( |
| D, Genetic variants in | |||||||||||
| 28 | Nonsense | 1 | rs199689137 | Chr2: 44050063 | 0.00018 | Cytoplasmic | Pathogenic | D | D | - | ( |
| 29 | Missense | 1 | rs137852987 | Chr2: 44099233 | 0.00102 | Cytoplasmic | Pathogenic | D | D | - | ( |
| 30 | Missense | 1 | rs201690654 | Chr2, 44102425 | 0.000215 | Transmembrane | Unknown significance | D | D | D | ( |
| E, Genetic variant in | |||||||||||
| 31 | c.894G>A p. (Q298=) | 1 | rs116928232 | Chr10: 89222511 | 0.00083 | Exon skipping mutation | Pathogenic | -- | D | -- | ( |
| F, Genetic variant in | |||||||||||
| 32 | Missense Exon 9 c.1486C>T p.(Arg496Trp) | 1 | rs374603772 | Chr1, 55524303 | 0.000044 | LDLR-binding | Unknown significance/ conflicting- interpretations-of- pathogenicity | D | D | D | ( |
aThe frequency of the identified variants was additionally assessed following in-house exome databases. Novel variants were not found in the Russian 870 exomes and the Northwest Russia 694 exomes databases.
bThe prediction of the pathogenicity was performed using SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationTaster tools if suitable. For two intronic variants, analysis with Human Splicing Finder was performed: These variants alter canonical splice donor sites in introns 6 and 8 of the LDLR gene, respectively.
cPathogenicity prediction for novel variants was performed according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-based classification, for already characterized variants-classification according to ClinVar database.
dThese variants were functionally characterized by ex vivo or in vitro studies. In the case of LDLR <30% of normal receptor activity was seen; in the case of APOB reduction in the binding and uptake of LDL was observed; in the case of ABCG8 the amount of mature protein was decreased. B, benign; D, damaging/disease causing.
Figure 1Sanger sequencing results for next-generation sequencing-determined novel LDLR variants: (A) c.325T>G p.(Cys109Gly); (B) c.401G>C p.(Cys134Ser); (C) c.433_434dupG p.(Val145Glyfs*35); (D) c.616A>C p.(Ser206Arg); (E) c.940+1_c.940+4 delGTGA (g.18154_18157delGTGA); (F) c.1186G>C p.(Gly396Arg); and (G) c.1684_1691delTGGCCCAA p.(Pro563Hisfs*14).