Literature DB >> 3326876

Identification of cardiac rejection with magnetic resonance imaging in heterotopic heart transplantation model.

T Nishimura1, M Sada, H Sasaki, C Yutani, T Kozuka, H Amemiya, T Fujita, T Akutsu, H Manabe.   

Abstract

It is important to evaluate the severity and extent of cardiac rejection in heart transplantations. Eight heterotopic heart transplantations using mongrel dogs were performed, and grated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the donor hearts was carried out. High signal intensity was obtained in the rejected myocardium at the time of cardiac rejection, especially from the right ventricular wall to the intraventricular septal wall compared with the left ventricular posterolateral wall. In addition, MRI was performed in the excised heart. High signal intensity was also observed in the same region of the excised donor hearts. The histopathological rejection scores were well in agreement with prolonged T1 and T2 relaxation times; severe and mild rejection of the myocardium were distinguished by the T1 and T2 relaxation times. Our results suggest that MRI is able to visualize the transplanted myocardium undergoing rejection and that the right ventricular wall is more sensitive to cardiac rejection than the left. MRI may allow noninvasive evaluation of the severity and extent of cardiac rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3326876     DOI: 10.1007/bf02058789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac homotransplantation.

Authors:  W A Baumgartner; B A Reitz; P E Oyer; E B Stinson; N E Shumway
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Diagnosis of human cardiac allograft rejection by serial cardiac biopsy.

Authors:  P K Caves; E B Stinson; M E Billingham; A K Rider; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Acute rejection following cardiac transplantation. Phonocardiographic and ultrasound observations.

Authors:  J S Schroeder; R L Popp; E B Stinson; E Dong; N E Shumway; D C Harrison
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cardiac transplantations in dogs: evaluation with MR.

Authors:  D Tscholakoff; T Aherne; E S Yee; N Derugin; C B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Role of 201Tl in the management of cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  J I Pinedo; A Golitsin; J A Cienfuegos; J L Castillo-Olivares; D Figuera; J Ortiz Berrocal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1985

6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiovascular system: normal and pathologic findings.

Authors:  R J Herfkens; C B Higgins; H Hricak; M J Lipton; L E Crooks; P Lanzer; E Botvinick; B Brundage; P E Sheldon; L Kaufman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The potential impact of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiovascular diagnosis.

Authors:  L Kaufman; L Crooks; P Sheldon; H Hricak; R Herfkens; W Bank
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Technetium-99m pyrophosphate in diagnosis of acute cardiac rejection in the rat with effect of cyclosporine: concise communication.

Authors:  C G McGregor; R Hatz; S Aziz; M B Billingham; I R McDougall
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times.

Authors:  C B Higgins; R Herfkens; M J Lipton; R Sievers; P Sheldon; L Kaufman; L E Crooks
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Imaging and characterization of acute myocardial infarction in vivo by gated nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  G Wesbey; C B Higgins; P Lanzer; E Botvinick; M J Lipton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 29.690

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Andrew L Rivard; Cory M Swingen; Donnevan Blake; Andrea S Huang; Pooja Kanth; Grete F Thomsen; Erin J Cordova; Leslie W Miller; Richard W Bianco; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Quantitative myocardial tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance in heart transplant patients with suspected cardiac rejection.

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Louise Thomson; Ryan Levine; Sadia J Dimbil; Jignesh Patel; Jon A Kobashigawa; Evan Kransdorf; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman; Balaji Tamarappoo
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Late complications of heart transplantation: an 11-year experience.

Authors:  S Esposito; A Renzulli; L Agozzino; K Thomopoulos; M Piccolo; C Maiello; A Della Corte; M Cotrufo
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart transplant patients: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers: T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction, for acute rejection diagnosis.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Vermes; Clémence Pantaléon; Adrien Auvet; Nicolas Cazeneuve; Marie Christine Machet; Anne Delhommais; Thierry Bourguignon; Michel Aupart; Laurent Brunereau
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.