Literature DB >> 33268536

Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System.

Romney Humphries1, Shelley Campeau1, Thomas E Davis2, Kristin J Nagaro2, Vincent J LaBombardi3, Simone Franklin4, Lisa Heimbach5, Hari P Dwivedi6.   

Abstract

In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], ≤8/4 μg/ml; resistant [R], ≥16/4 μg/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of ≥95% reproducibility and ≥95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CZA; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas; Vitek 2; automated susceptibility testing; ceftazidime-avibactam

Year:  2021        PMID: 33268536      PMCID: PMC8106713          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01870-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices.

Authors:  James H Jorgensen; Mary Jane Ferraro
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  The Susceptibility Testing Manufacturers Association Presents an Opinion for the Delay of Current Susceptibility Tests.

Authors:  Susan M Kircher; Sharon K Cullen; Scott Killian; Barbara L Zimmer; Bill B Brasso
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Evaluation of the automated BD Phoenix CPO Detect test for detection and classification of carbapenemases in Gram negatives.

Authors:  Imane Saad Albichr; Ahalieyah Anantharajah; Magali Dodémont; Marie Hallin; Alexia Verroken; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST): a review of changing trends, quality control guidelines, test accuracy, and recommendation for the testing of beta-lactam drugs.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 5.  Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Review in the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Matt Shirley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Validation of Sensititre Dry-Form Broth Microdilution Panels for Susceptibility Testing of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, a Broad-Spectrum-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Nicole M Holliday; Kevin M Krause
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Ryan K Shields; Cornelius J Clancy; A William Pasculle; Ellen G Press; Ghady Haidar; Binghua Hao; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; M Hong Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-negative Organisms.

Authors:  Roopali Sharma; Tae Eun Park; Stanley Moy
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, Phase II trial.

Authors:  Christopher Lucasti; Irinel Popescu; Mayakonda K Ramesh; Joy Lipka; Carole Sable
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae: determination of disk content and Kirby-Bauer breakpoint for ceftazidime/avibactam.

Authors:  Xianggui Yang; Dan Wang; Qin Zhou; Fang Nie; Hongfei Du; Xueli Pang; Yingzi Fan; Tingting Bai; Ying Xu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Ins and Outs of Susceptibility Testing for New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for Gram-Negative Organisms.

Authors:  Tanis C Dingle; Johann Pitout
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 11.677

Review 2.  Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Paolo Gaibani; Tommaso Giani; Federica Bovo; Donatella Lombardo; Stefano Amadesi; Tiziana Lazzarotto; Marco Coppi; Gian Maria Rossolini; Simone Ambretti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Evaluation of MicroScan WalkAway for Determination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  Carmen Antonia Sanches Ito; Larissa Bail; Lavinia Nery Villa Stangler Arend; Kleber Oliveira Silva; Simone Sebold Michelotto; Keite da Silva Nogueira; Felipe Francisco Tuon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest versus Broth Microdilution for Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Arhodoula Papadomanolaki; Maria Siopi; Polyxeni Karakosta; Sophia Vourli; Spyros Pournaras
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  Susceptibility of Meropenem-Resistant and/or Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam as Assessed by In Vitro Testing Methods.

Authors:  Venere Cortazzo; Brunella Posteraro; Giulia Menchinelli; Flora Marzia Liotti; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Barbara Fiori; Francesco Luzzaro; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29

6.  Comparative Experimental Investigation of Biodegradable Antimicrobial Polymer-Based Composite Produced by 3D Printing Technology Enriched with Metallic Particles.

Authors:  Waleed Ahmed; Ali H Al-Marzouqi; Muhammad Hamza Nazir; Tahir A Rizvi; Essam Zaneldin; Mushtaq Khan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.