| Literature DB >> 33267172 |
Lingbo Liu1, Binxin Xia1, Hao Wu2, Jie Zhao1, Zhenghong Peng2, Yang Yu1.
Abstract
The natural city, which is essential to understand urban physical scale and identify urban sprawling in urban studies, represents the urban functional boundaries of the city defined by human activities rather than the administrative boundaries. Most studies tend to utilize physical environment data such as street networks and remote sensing data to delimitate the natural city, however, such data may not match the real distribution of human activity density in the new cities or even ghost cities in China. This paper suggests aggregating the natural city boundary from the service area polygons of points of interest based on Reilly's Law of Retail Gravitation and the maximum entropy method, since most points of interests provide services for surrounding communities, reflecting the vitality in a bottom-up way. The results indicate that the natural city defined by points of interests shows a high resolution and accuracy, providing a method to define the natural city with POIs.Entities:
Keywords: Reilly’s Law; head/tail breaks; maximum entropy method; natural city; points of interest; uncertainty problems
Year: 2019 PMID: 33267172 PMCID: PMC7514947 DOI: 10.3390/e21050458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.524
Figure 1The pre-constructed street network in the east of Wuhan.
Figure 2Workflow of SA-MaxEnt.
Figure 3Service area generation based on Reilly’s law.
Figure 4The assumption illustration for seeking threshold value by MaxEnt.
Figure 5Urban expansion diagrams based on gridded population distribution. (a) Restaurants; (b) Stores; (c) Banks; (d) MP base stations.
Service area and perimeter statistics of POI and mobile phone stations.
| Restaurant | Stores | Bank | MP Base Station | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | 13207 | 9678 | 4289 | 10212 |
| Service Area | (km2) | |||
| Min area | 0.000008 | 0.000180 | 0.000133 | 0.000012 |
| Max area | 185.819 | 130.447822 | 180.126999 | 42.908001 |
| Mean | 0. 650851 | 0.888088 | 2.002382 | 0.842049 |
| Standard Error | 4.5672 | 14.107599 | 9.164582 | 2.361717 |
| Perimeter | (km) | |||
| Min Perimeter | 0.017092 | 0. 061354 | 0. 057230 | 0.016712 |
| Max Perimeter | 57.826401 | 64.695572 | 59.245899 | 27.1527 |
| Mean | 1.520791 | 2.074611 | 3.13577 | 2.358477 |
| Standard Error | 3.530842 | 3.84682 | 5.797607 | 3.044902 |
Figure 6Logarithmic Rank-Size distribution of service area.
Figure 7Maximum Entropy threshold value.
Threshold value comparison.
| Mean (M) | MaxEnt (H) | Ratio (H/M) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurants | 1.520791 | 1.430 | 0.940300 | 3.0334876 |
| Stores | 2.074611 | 2.355 | 1.135152 | 4.9957086 |
| Banks | 3.13577 | 3.052 | 0.973285 | 6.4742686 |
| MP Base Stations | 2.358477 | 1.977 | 0.838252 | 4.1938496 |
Area of Natural city boundaries delimitated by the different threshold values.
| Mean(M) | MaxEnt(H) |
| TIN-Head/Tail Breaks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurants | 204.62 km2 | 186.24 km2 | 427.18 km2 | 240.47 km2 |
| Stores | 337.76 km2 | 388.77 km2 | 815.77km2 | 134.44 km2 |
| Banks | 282.21 km2 | 271.33 km2 | 617.9 km2 | 199.10 km2 |
| MP Base Stations | 536.48 km2 | 424.07 km2 | 1017.832 km2 | 846.17 km2 |
| Road Junctions (BCL) | 807.34 km2 | |||
Figure 8Natural city boundaries extracted by threshold values.
Figure 9Natural city boundaries extracted by TIN and head/tail breaks.
Figure 10Relevance of population density and perimeters of service area. (a) Kernel density of mobile phone population; (b) Sample Subcenters; (c) Perimeter vs population of SA.