| Literature DB >> 33267085 |
Hamid A Jalab1, Thamarai Subramaniam1, Rabha W Ibrahim1, Hasan Kahtan2, Nurul F Mohd Noor1.
Abstract
Forgery in digital images is immensely affected by the improvement of image manipulation tools. Image forgery can be classified as image splicing or copy-move on the basis of the image manipulation type. Image splicing involves creating a new tampered image by merging the components of one or more images. Moreover, image splicing disrupts the content and causes abnormality in the features of a tampered image. Most of the proposed algorithms are incapable of accurately classifying high-dimension feature vectors. Thus, the current study focuses on improving the accuracy of image splicing detection with low-dimension feature vectors. This study also proposes an approximated Machado fractional entropy (AMFE) of the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to effectively capture splicing artifacts inside an image. AMFE is used as a new fractional texture descriptor, while DWT is applied to decompose the input image into a number of sub-images with different frequency bands. The standard image dataset CASIA v2 was used to evaluate the proposed approach. Superior detection accuracy and positive and false positive rates were achieved compared with other state-of-the-art approaches with a low-dimension of feature vectors.Entities:
Keywords: discrete wavelet transform; fractional calculus; fractional entropy; image forgery; image splicing
Year: 2019 PMID: 33267085 PMCID: PMC7514855 DOI: 10.3390/e21040371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.524
Figure 1(a) Original image; (b) spliced image.
Figure 2Block size with detection accuracy.
Figure 3Samples of the images from CASIA v2.
Figure 4The value of α with detection accuracy.
Figure 5Color space combinations with detection accuracy.
Results of the proposed approach obtained from the CASIA v2 image dataset.
| Colors | Dim | TNR%(Spl) | TPR%(Aut) | Accuracy % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | 24 | 80 | 84 | 92.90 |
| Cb | 24 | 99 | 96 | 98.60 |
| Cr | 24 | 99 | 95 | 99.50 |
| CbCr | 48 | 99 | 95 | 99.50 |
| YCb | 48 | 99 | 97 | 98.30 |
| YCr | 48 | 99 | 99 | 98.60 |
| All | 72 | 99 | 98 | 98.80 |
The results of the proposed approach compared with other methods.
| Methods | Dimension Reduction | Dimension | TNR (%) | TPR (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhao et al. [ | None | 60 | 79.10 | 91.80 | 94.70 |
| Hakimi. F et al. [ | PCA | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 97.21 |
| Park et al. [ | PCA | 100 | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 95.40 |
| Shen et al. [ | None | 48 | 99.46 | 96.34 | 97.08 |
| Moghaddasi et al. [ | Kernel PCA | 60 | 100 | 98.59 | 99.36 |
| Proposed | None | 24 | 99 | 95 | 99.50 |