| Literature DB >> 33266412 |
Jia Lin1,2, Hanano Yamada3, Ningfeng Lu1,2, Guofu Ao1,2, Weiwei Yuan1,2, Xuxiang Liu1,2, Pumo Cai1,2,4, Minlin Zheng1,2, Jianquan Yang1,2, Qing'e Ji1,2.
Abstract
Cold storage and heat exposure are crucial components of tephritid fruit fly mass-rearing programs, as they influence the development and fitness traits of produced flies. This work investigated the effects of cold storage on the pupal developmental parameters and quality of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) genetic sexing strain (GSS) adults. Furthermore, the impact of short-term thermal exposure on the fecundity of B. dorsalis (GSS) that also underwent pupal cold storage was examined. Our results show that pupal development time, emergence rate, partial emergence rate, flight ability and fecundity were significantly affected by low temperature and pupal age and their interaction. Pupal cold storage did not pose negative impacts on the mating competition and response to methyl eugenol (ME) in the males. In addition, compared with the adults that were subjected to the same pupal storage protocol (five-day-old pupae stored at 13 °C), adult exposure to 41 °C for 1 h showed significant reparative effects on fecundity. In summary, the cold storage procedure of B. dorsalis (GSS) pupae has the potential to improve the flexibility and efficiency of mass-rearing schedules. Furthermore, short-term thermal exposure showed reparative effects on the fecundity costs induced by pupal cold storage in B. dorsalis (GSS).Entities:
Keywords: fecundity; male quality; mass-rearing; oriental fruit fly; pupal cold storage; short-term thermal exposure
Year: 2020 PMID: 33266412 PMCID: PMC7700362 DOI: 10.3390/insects11110821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Univariate analysis of effects of factors on development parameters and fitness traits (flight ability, fecundity, dry weight) of B. dorsalis (genetic sexing strains (GSS)).
| Biological Parameters | Factors | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pupal development time | A | 3, 52 | 11,628.11 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 52 | 864.99 | <0.001 | |
| A × B | 3, 52 | 502.20 | <0.001 | |
| Emergence rate (%) | A | 3, 54 | 1344.47 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 54 | 40.32 | <0.001 | |
| A × B | 3, 54 | 15.21 | <0.001 | |
| Deformed adult rate (%) | A | 3, 54 | 14.50 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 54 | 2.26 | 0.116 | |
| A × B | 3, 54 | 10.47 | <0.001 | |
| Partial emergence rate (%) | A | 3, 54 | 393.99 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 54 | 3.59 | <0.05 | |
| A × B | 3, 54 | 10.00 | <0.001 |
A: storage temperature; B: pupal age.
Mean ± SE of pupal development time, emergence rate, adult morphological normality rate, deformed adult rate and partial emergence rate of B. dorsalis (GSS) pupae (1 d old, 3 d old and 5 d old) stored at temperature of 10, 13, 16 and 19 °C.
| Storage | Pupal Age (d) | Development Time (Days) | Emergence Rate (%) | Deformed Adult Rate (%) | Partial Emergence Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | 11.05 ± 0.02 a | 97.00 ± 0.68 a | 0.33 ± 0.21 a | 1.17 ± 0.31 a |
| 19 °C | 1 | 15.40 ± 0.11 d | 95.50 ± 1.06 a | 1.33 ± 0.33 a | 1.17 ± 0.31 a |
| 3 | 14.78 ± 0.02 c | 94.83 ± 1.30 a | 1.83 ± 0.48 ab | 2.00 ± 0.68 a | |
| 5 | 13.78 ± 0.02 b | 96.00 ± 0.58 a | 0.67 ± 0.21 a | 1.17 ± 0.31 a | |
| 16 °C | 1 | 21.22 ± 0.22 g | 77.33 ± 1.36 b | 4.33 ± 0.76 bc | 6.67 ± 0.80 a |
| 3 | 20.00 ± 0.21 f | 82.17 ± 1.80 b | 3.17 ± 0.60 ab | 5.00 ± 0.48 a | |
| 5 | 18.56 ± 0.09 e | 92.83 ± 0.95 a | 1.17 ± 0.48 a | 2.67 ± 0.95 a | |
| 13 °C | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | 43.33 ± 0.24 i | 5.17 ± 1.97 d | 2.33 ± 1.05 ab | 42.67 ± 4.18 b | |
| 5 | 32.70 ± 0.10 h | 21.67 ± 2.29 c | 6.67 ± 1.05 c | 55.50 ± 1.41 c | |
| 10 °C | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | - | - | - | - |
The mean value in a column followed by the same letter does not differ significantly (P > 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test (one-way ANOVA). “-” means no adults emerged, and data of treatments without adults’ emergence were not conducted in the analyses.
Univariate analysis of effects of factors on fitness traits (flight ability, fecundity, dry weight) of B. dorsalis (GSS).
| Biological Parameters | Factors | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight ability (%) | A | 3, 54 | 256.64 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 54 | 43.95 | <0.001 | |
| A × B | 3, 54 | 9.36 | <0.001 | |
| Fecundity | A | 3, 54 | 158.04 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 54 | 9.29 | <0.001 | |
| A × B | 3, 54 | 8.20 | <0.001 | |
| Dry weight | A | 3, 540 | 30.49 | <0.001 |
| B | 2, 540 | 3.76 | 0.024 | |
| C | 1, 540 | 1.12 | 0.273 | |
| A × B | 3, 540 | 1.98 | 0.115 | |
| B × C | 2, 540 | 0.68 | 0.507 | |
| A × C | 3, 540 | 0.28 | 0.844 | |
| A × B × C | 3, 540 | 0.56 | 0.637 |
A: storage temperature; B: pupal age; C: sex.
Mean ± SE of flight ability and dry weight of B. dorsalis (GSS) of pupae (1 d old, 3 d old and 5 d old) stored at temperature of 13, 16 and 19 °C.
| Storage Temperature | Pupal Age | Flight Ability (%) | Dry Weight (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |||
| Control | - | 75.83 ± 2.41 a | 2.43 ± 0.04 Ac | 2.43 ± 0.06 Ac |
| 19 °C | 1 | 50.50 ± 2.97 c | 2.32 ± 0.08 Abc | 2.36 ± 0.06 Abc |
| 3 | 59.17 ± 2.69 bc | 2.39 ± 0.05 Abc | 2.41 ± 0.05 Ac | |
| 5 | 64.33 ± 3.21 ab | 2.42 ± 0.04 Ac | 2.44 ± 0.05 Ac | |
| 16 °C | 1 | 28.33 ± 3.47 d | 2.25 ± 0.05 Abc | 2.34 ± 0.05 Abc |
| 3 | 38.50 ± 2.30 d | 2.26 ± 0.07 Abc | 2.38 ± 0.05 Abc | |
| 5 | 63.33 ± 2.30 b | 2.35 ± 0.05 Abc | 2.30 ± 0.05 Abc | |
| 13 °C | 1 | - | - | - |
| 3 | 1.17 ± 0.48 e | 1.97 ± 0.06 Aa | 2.00 ± 0.05 Aa | |
| 5 | 4.83 ± 0.48 e | 2.14 ± 0.05 Aab | 2.16 ± 0.04 Aab | |
The mean value in a column followed by the same lower letter does not differ significantly (p > 0.05) according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (one-way ANOVA), and value of dry weight in a row followed by the same capital letter does not differ significantly (p > 0.05) according to paired t test.
Figure 1Fecundity of B. dorsalis (GSS) after pupae (1 d old, 3 d old and 5 d old) stored at temperature of 13, 16 and 19 °C. The mean value followed by the same letter does not differ significantly (p > 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 2Mating competitiveness (mean ± SE) in the laboratory (a) and response to methyl eugenol (ME) in a field cage (b) of male B. dorsalis (GSS) after pupal cold storage.
Figure 3Impact of 1 h short-term heat exposure on the (a) mortality, (b) fecundity, (c) egg-hatching rate, and (d) pupation rate of post-storage adults (5 day-old pupae stored at 13 °C). The mean value followed by the same letter does not differ significantly (p > 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test (one-way ANOVA).