Literature DB >> 33265954

Temporal Change in Alert Override Rate with a Minimally Interruptive Clinical Decision Support on a Next-Generation Electronic Medical Record.

Won Chul Cha1,2,3, Weon Jung1, Jaeyong Yu1, Junsang Yoo4, Jinwook Choi2.   

Abstract

Background and objectives: The aim of this study is to describe the temporal change in alert override with a minimally interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) on a Next-Generation electronic medical record (EMR) and analyze factors associated with the change. Materials and
Methods: The minimally interruptive CDS used in this study was implemented in the hospital in 2016, which was a part of the new next-generation EMR, Data Analytics and Research Window for Integrated kNowledge (DARWIN), which does not generate modals, 'pop-ups' but show messages as in-line information. The prescription (medication order) and alerts data from July 2016 to December 2017 were extracted. Piece-wise regression analysis and linear regression analysis was performed to determine the temporal change and factors associated with it.
Results: Overall, 2,706,395 alerts and 993 doctors were included in the study. Among doctors, 37.2% were faculty (professors), 17.2% were fellows, and 45.6% trainees (interns and residents). The overall override rate was 61.9%. There was a significant change in an increasing trend at month 12 (p < 0.001). We found doctors' positions and specialties, along with the number of alerts and medication variability, were significantly associated with the change. Conclusions: In this study, we found a significant temporal change of alert override. We also found factors associated with the change, which had statistical significance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical; computer-assisted; decision support systems; drug therapy; electronic health records; medical order entry systems

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33265954      PMCID: PMC7761179          DOI: 10.3390/medicina56120662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  29 in total

1.  Computer-based decision support: wishing on a star?

Authors:  D K Owens; D M Bravata
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies.

Authors:  Craig R Ramsay; Lloyd Matowe; Roberto Grilli; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Ruth E Thomas
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Clinical decision support systems could be modified to reduce 'alert fatigue' while still minimizing the risk of litigation.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Kathrin Cresswell; Shobha Phansalkar; David W Bates; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Drivers of poor medical care.

Authors:  Vikas Saini; Sandra Garcia-Armesto; David Klemperer; Valerie Paris; Adam G Elshaug; Shannon Brownlee; John P A Ioannidis; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; Natasha Fernandes; Jeff M Wilczynski; Brian J Hemens; John J You; Steven M Handler; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan M Souza; Joseph Beyene; Harriette G C Van Spall; Amit X Garg; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-14

6.  Physicians' responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods.

Authors:  Anne-Marie J Scheepers-Hoeks; Rene J Grouls; Cees Neef; Eric W Ackerman; Erik H Korsten
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Clinical reminders designed and implemented using cognitive and organizational science principles decrease reminder fatigue.

Authors:  Lee A Green; Donald Nease; Michael S Klinkman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety.

Authors:  Pascal Bonnabry; Christelle Despont-Gros; Damien Grauser; Pierre Casez; Magali Despond; Deborah Pugin; Claire Rivara-Mangeat; Magali Koch; Martine Vial; Anne Iten; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Differences of Reasons for Alert Overrides on Contraindicated Co-prescriptions by Admitting Department.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Ahn; Soo-Yeon Cho; Dahye Shin; Chul Jang; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2014-10-31

10.  Statistical process control and interrupted time series: a golden opportunity for impact evaluation in quality improvement.

Authors:  Atle Fretheim; Oliver Tomic
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  1 in total

1.  Appropriateness of Alerts and Physicians' Responses With a Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support System: Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Hyunjung Park; Won Chul Cha; Minjung Kathy Chae; Woohyeon Jeong; Jaeyong Yu; Weon Jung; Hansol Chang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-10-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.