| Literature DB >> 33265704 |
Muhammad Idrees Afridi1, Muhammad Qasim1, Abid Hussanan2,3.
Abstract
In this article, we investigated entropy generation and heat transfer analysis in a viscous flow induced by a horizontally moving Riga plate in the presence of strong suction. The viscosity and thermal conductivity of the fluid are taken to be temperature dependent. The frictional heating function and non-linear radiation terms are also incorporated in the entropy generation and energy equation. The partial differential equations which model the flow are converted into dimensionless form by using proper transformations. Further, the dimensionless equations are reduced by imposing the conditions of strong suction. Numerical solutions are obtained using MATLAB boundary value solver bvp4c and used to evaluate the entropy generation number. The influences of physical flow parameters arise in the mathematical modeling are demonstrated through various graphs. The analysis reveals that velocity decays whereas entropy generation increases with rising values of variable viscosity parameter. Furthermore, entropy generation decays with increasing variable thermal conductivity parameter.Entities:
Keywords: Riga plate; entropy generation; heat transfer; non-linear Rosseland thermal radiations; variable transport properties; viscous and magnetic dissipation
Year: 2018 PMID: 33265704 PMCID: PMC7513142 DOI: 10.3390/e20080615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.524
Figure 1(a) Sketch of Riga plate with coordinates system; (b) Sketch of the flow showing the velocity and temperature profile.
Comparison of the numerical values of for different embedding physical flow parameters.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shooting | bvp4c |
| −3.0 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
|
|
| −4.0 |
|
| |||||||
| −5.0 |
|
| |||||||
| −3.0 | 1.0 |
|
| ||||||
| 2.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 3.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 2.5 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| 0.5 |
|
| |||||||
| 1.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| 0.5 |
|
| |||||||
| 1.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.7 |
|
| ||||||
| 1.2 |
|
| |||||||
| 3.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 1.2 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| 0.3 |
|
| |||||||
| 0.6 |
|
| |||||||
| 0.5 | 1.0 |
|
| ||||||
| 2.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 5.0 |
|
| |||||||
| 1.0 | 1.1 |
|
| ||||||
| 1.2 |
|
| |||||||
| 1.3 |
|
| |||||||
Figure 2Effects of on (a) velocity profile (b) temperature distribution and (c) entropy generation.
Figure 3Effects of on (a) velocity profile (b) temperature distribution and (c) entropy generation.
Figure 4Effects of on (a) temperature distribution and (b) entropy generation.
Figure 5Effects of on (a) velocity profile and (b) entropy generation.
Figure 6Effects of on (a) temperature distribution and (b) entropy generation.
Figure 7Effects of on (a) temperature distribution and (b) entropy generation.
Figure 8Effects of on (a) temperature distribution and (b) entropy generation.
Figure 9Effects of on (a) temperature distribution and (b) entropy generation.