| Literature DB >> 33264668 |
Neha Jain1, Uma Shankar1, Prativa Majee1, Amit Kumar2.
Abstract
Novel SARS coronavirus (Entities:
Keywords: Antigenic epitopes; COVID-19; Multi-epitope-vaccine; Next generation vaccinology; Protective vaccine; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2020 PMID: 33264668 PMCID: PMC7700730 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Genet Evol ISSN: 1567-1348 Impact factor: 3.342
Fig. 1Schematic representation of next-generation vaccinology approach used for the prediction of multi-epitope-vaccine construct for SARS-CoV-2.
List of SARS-CoV proteins used for antigenicity prediction using VaxiJen server. The antigenic proteins with Antigenicity Score ≥ 0.4 were taken for epitope screening.
| NCBI accession number | SARS-CoV-2 proteins | Antigenicity score | Antigenicity prediction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QHD43415_1 | ORF1ab | Host translation inhibitor (nsp1) | 0.4064 | Probable ANTIGEN |
| QHD43415_2 | Non-structural protein 2 (nsp2) | 0.4034 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_3 | Papain-like proteinase | 0.5142 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_4 | Non-structural protein 4 (nsp4) | 0.4575 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_5 | Proteinase | 0.4159 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_6 | Non-structural protein 6 (nsp6) | 0.5813 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_7 | Non-structural protein 7 (nsp7) | 0.4167 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_8 | Non-structural protein 8 (nsp8) | 0.4008 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_9 | Non-structural protein 9 (nsp9) | 0.6476 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | Non-structural protein 10 (nsp10) | 0.4039 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | RNA-directed RNA polymerase (RdRp) | 0.4064 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | Helicase (Hel) | 0.448 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | Guanine-N7 methyltransferase (ExoN) | 0.4138 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | Uridylate-specific endoribonuclease (NendoU) | 0.5554 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43415_1 | 2’- | 0.38 | Probable NON-ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43416 | Surface glycoprotein | 0.4646 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43417 | ORF3a | 0.4945 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43418 | ORF4 (E Protein) | 0.6025 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43419 | Membrane Protein | 0.5102 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43420 | ORF6 | 0.6131 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43421 | ORF7a | 0.6441 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43422 | ORF8 | 0.6502 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHD43423 | Nucleocapsid Protein | 0.5059 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
| QHI42199 | ORF10 | 0.7185 | Probable ANTIGEN | |
Fig. 2HTL, CTL, and BCL epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 proteome. Location of selected Helper T-Lymphocytes epitopes (Blue), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes epitopes (Red), and B Cell Lymphocytes epitopes (Purple) in the three-dimensional structures of the antigenic proteins of SARS-CoV-2.
Fig. 3Population Coverage and designing of the SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct. A. Population coverage of the multi-epitope vaccine construct based on the coverages of HLA class I and class II alleles in combination in various countries. B. The sequence of the multi-epitope vaccine construct with HTLs, CTLs, and BCL epitopes along with various adjuvants and linkers. C. Schematic representation of the SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct.
The results of physiochemical properties, antigenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct.
| Antigenicity Prediction using VaxiJen | 0.6199 (Probable ANTIGEN). | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Allergenicity analysis | Allertop | PROBABLE NON-ALLERGEN | |
| AllergenFP | PROBABLE NON-ALLERGEN | ||
| AlgPred prediction | Prediction by mapping of IgE epitope | The protein sequence does not contain experimentally proven IgE epitope | |
| MAST RESULT | No Hits found | ||
| Prediction by SVM method based on amino acid composition | Score = −1.0824782 [Threshold = −0.4] | ||
| BLAST Results of ARPS: | No Hits found | ||
| Prediction by Hybrid Approach | NON ALLERGEN | ||
| Toxicity Analysis Using ToxinPred | Non-Toxin | ||
| Physiochemical properties analysis using ProtParam | Number of amino acids | 602 | |
| Molecular weight | 65,323.19 Da | ||
| Theoretical pI | 10.06 | ||
| Estimated half-life | >30 h (mammalian reticulocytes, in vitro). | ||
| >20 h (yeast, in vivo). | |||
| >10 h ( | |||
| Instability index | The instability index (II) is computed to be 31.93. This classifies the protein as stable. | ||
| Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) | 0.213 | ||
| Solubility analysis using SolPro | Predicted Solubility upon Overexpression | SOLUBLE with probability 0.699016 | |
Fig. 4Secondary structure predictions of SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct. A. The sequence of the vaccine construct along with the predicted secondary structure. B. The overall percentage of various secondary structures in the vaccine construct as predicted by SOPMA server. C Pictorial representations of various secondary structures in the multi-epitope vaccine construct. D. Propensity of occurrence of various secondary structures according to the residues in the vaccine construct. The secondary structure at a particular residue was predicted by the height of the peak.
Fig. 5Tertiary structure and validation of the SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct. (A) Represents the modeled structure of the vaccine construct where HTL epitopes are depicted by Salmon Pink color, CTL by Orange, BCL epitopes by Cyan, and adjuvants by Blue. (B & C) Ramachandran plot and ERRAT plot generated for the modeled vaccine construct. (D) The modeled (Cyan) and refined structure (Red) of the SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct depicting the changes in the structure before and after refinement. (E&F) Ramachandran plot and ERRAT plot generated for the refined structure of the vaccine construct.
Fig. 6Standard molecular Dynamics analysis of SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct. (A) Representation of the change in potential energy vs time steps (in ns) during energy minimization of the vaccine construct. (B) Temperature Vs Time steps showing the constant temperature throughout the 10 ns simulation study. (C) RMSD Vs TS depicting the root mean square deviation of the atoms of multi-epitope vaccine construct during the 10 ns dynamic simulation. (D – F) Energy plots representing Kinetic, potential, and total energy w.r.t. TS for the Vaccine construct system in a water sphere.
Fig. 7Molecular interaction analysis of SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct with an immunological receptor Human TLR3. (A & B) Representation of TLR3-vaccine construct in ribbon (A) and surface form (Blue Human TLR3 ad Green- multi-epitope vaccine construct). (C) Representation of the change in potential energy Vs time steps (in ns) of the TLR3-vaccine construct during energy minimization. (D) Temperature Vs Time steps showing the constant temperature throughout 10 ns simulation study. (E – G) Energy plots representing Kinetic, potential, and total energy w.r.t. TS for the Vaccine construct system in a water sphere. (H) RMSF Vs TS for the residues of TLR3-vaccine construct complex (I) RMSD Vs TS depicting the root mean square deviation of the atoms of TLR3-vaccine construct during the 10 ns dynamic simulation.
Fig. 8Codon optimization and In silico cloning of the cDNA of SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine construct. Representation of the CAI score of the cDNA construct of SARS-CoV-2 multi-epitope vaccine before adaptation (A) and after adaptation (B). (C) Pictorial representation of the SARS-CoV-2-multi-epitope vaccine construct plasmid that can be used for the expression and purification of the vaccine product inside Escherichia coli.