Literature DB >> 33264404

Developmental differences in genome replication program and origin activation.

Cathia Rausch1, Patrick Weber1, Paulina Prorok1, David Hörl2, Andreas Maiser2, Anne Lehmkuhl1, Vadim O Chagin1,3, Corella S Casas-Delucchi1, Heinrich Leonhardt2, M Cristina Cardoso1.   

Abstract

To ensure error-free duplication of all (epi)genetic information once per cell cycle, DNA replication follows a cell type and developmental stage specific spatio-temporal program. Here, we analyze the spatio-temporal DNA replication progression in (un)differentiated mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. Whereas telomeres replicate throughout S-phase, we observe mid S-phase replication of (peri)centromeric heterochromatin in mES cells, which switches to late S-phase replication upon differentiation. This replication timing reversal correlates with and depends on an increase in condensation and a decrease in acetylation of chromatin. We further find synchronous duplication of the Y chromosome, marking the end of S-phase, irrespectively of the pluripotency state. Using a combination of single-molecule and super-resolution microscopy, we measure molecular properties of the mES cell replicon, the number of replication foci active in parallel and their spatial clustering. We conclude that each replication nanofocus in mES cells corresponds to an individual replicon, with up to one quarter representing unidirectional forks. Furthermore, with molecular combing and genome-wide origin mapping analyses, we find that mES cells activate twice as many origins spaced at half the distance than somatic cells. Altogether, our results highlight fundamental developmental differences on progression of genome replication and origin activation in pluripotent cells.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33264404     DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  7 in total

1.  Isoform-specific and ubiquitination dependent recruitment of Tet1 to replicating heterochromatin modulates methylcytosine oxidation.

Authors:  María Arroyo; Florian D Hastert; Andreas Zhadan; Florian Schelter; Susanne Zimbelmann; Cathia Rausch; Anne K Ludwig; Thomas Carell; M Cristina Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Intrinsic neural stem cell properties define brain hypersensitivity to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Argyro Kalogeropoulou; Maria Mougkogianni; Marianna Iliadou; Eleni Nikolopoulou; Stefanos Flordelis; Alexandra Kanellou; Marina Arbi; Sofia Nikou; Jadwiga Nieminuszczy; Wojciech Niedzwiedz; Dimitrios Kardamakis; Vasiliki Bravou; Zoi Lygerou; Stavros Taraviras
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.294

Review 3.  Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.

Authors:  Lina-Marie Briu; Chrystelle Maric; Jean-Charles Cadoret
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Nuclear organisation and replication timing are coupled through RIF1-PP1 interaction.

Authors:  Ilya M Flyamer; Kyle N Klein; Stefano Gnan; Eleonora Castelli; Alexander Rapp; Andreas Maiser; Naiming Chen; Patrick Weber; Elin Enervald; M Cristina Cardoso; Wendy A Bickmore; David M Gilbert; Sara C B Buonomo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  MeCP2-induced heterochromatin organization is driven by oligomerization-based liquid-liquid phase separation and restricted by DNA methylation.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Hector Romero; Annika Schmidt; Katalina Gagova; Weihua Qin; Bianca Bertulat; Anne Lehmkuhl; Manuela Milden; Malte Eck; Tobias Meckel; Heinrich Leonhardt; M Cristina Cardoso
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Mobile origin-licensing factors confer resistance to conflicts with RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Matthias J Scherr; Syafiq Abd Wahab; Dirk Remus; Karl E Duderstadt
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Cytosine base modifications regulate DNA duplex stability and metabolism.

Authors:  Cathia Rausch; Peng Zhang; Corella S Casas-Delucchi; Julia L Daiß; Christoph Engel; Gideon Coster; Florian D Hastert; Patrick Weber; M Cristina Cardoso
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.