Elaine Okanyene Nsoesie1, Nina Cesare2, Martin Müller3, Al Ozonoff4. 1. Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts AveThird floor, Boston, US. 2. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, US. 3. École Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne, CH. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, US.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The epidemic of misinformation about COVID-19 transmission, prevention, and treatment has been raging since the start of the pandemic. However, data on exposure and impact of misinformation is not readily available. OBJECTIVE: We aim to characterize and compare the start, peak and doubling time of COVID-19 misinformation topics across eight countries using an exponential growth model usually employed to study infectious disease epidemics. METHODS: COVID-19 misinformation topics were selected from the WHO Mythbusters website. Data representing exposure was obtained from Google Trends API for eight English-speaking countries. Exponential growth models were used in modeling trends for each country. RESULTS: Searches for "coronavirus AND 5G" started at different times but peaked in the same week for six countries. Searches for 5G also had the shortest doubling time across all misinformation topics, with the shortest time in Nigeria and South Africa (approximately 4 to 5 days). Searches for "coronavirus AND ginger" started at the same time (the week of January 19) for several countries, but peaks were incongruent and searches did not always grow exponentially after the initial week. Searches for "coronavirus AND sun" had different start times across countries, but peaked at the same time for multiple countries. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns in start, peak and doubling time for "coronavirus AND 5G" were different from the other misinformation topics and were mostly consistent across countries assessed, which might be attributable to a lack of public understanding of 5G technology. Understanding the spread of misinformation, similarities and differences across different contexts can help in the development of appropriate interventions for limiting its impact similar to how we address infectious disease epidemics. Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of misinformation that discourages adherence to public health interventions could be predictive of future increases in disease cases.
BACKGROUND: The epidemic of misinformation about COVID-19 transmission, prevention, and treatment has been raging since the start of the pandemic. However, data on exposure and impact of misinformation is not readily available. OBJECTIVE: We aim to characterize and compare the start, peak and doubling time of COVID-19 misinformation topics across eight countries using an exponential growth model usually employed to study infectious disease epidemics. METHODS:COVID-19 misinformation topics were selected from the WHO Mythbusters website. Data representing exposure was obtained from Google Trends API for eight English-speaking countries. Exponential growth models were used in modeling trends for each country. RESULTS: Searches for "coronavirus AND 5G" started at different times but peaked in the same week for six countries. Searches for 5G also had the shortest doubling time across all misinformation topics, with the shortest time in Nigeria and South Africa (approximately 4 to 5 days). Searches for "coronavirus AND ginger" started at the same time (the week of January 19) for several countries, but peaks were incongruent and searches did not always grow exponentially after the initial week. Searches for "coronavirus AND sun" had different start times across countries, but peaked at the same time for multiple countries. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns in start, peak and doubling time for "coronavirus AND 5G" were different from the other misinformation topics and were mostly consistent across countries assessed, which might be attributable to a lack of public understanding of 5G technology. Understanding the spread of misinformation, similarities and differences across different contexts can help in the development of appropriate interventions for limiting its impact similar to how we address infectious disease epidemics. Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of misinformation that discourages adherence to public health interventions could be predictive of future increases in disease cases.
Authors: Edina Yq Tan; Russell Re Wee; Young Ern Saw; Kylie Jq Heng; Joseph We Chin; Eddie Mw Tong; Jean Cj Liu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Susan Cheatham; Per E Kummervold; Lorenza Parisi; Barbara Lanfranchi; Ileana Croci; Francesca Comunello; Maria Cristina Rota; Antonietta Filia; Alberto Eugenio Tozzi; Caterina Rizzo; Francesco Gesualdo Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-07-29
Authors: Joshua O Akinyemi; Melvin O Agunbiade; Mobolaji M Salawu; Olanrewaju D Eniade; Sanni Yaya; Olufunmilayo I Fawole Journal: Sci Afr Date: 2022-08-29