Literature DB >> 33263808

[Technical, operational, and regulatory considerations for the adoption of digital and computational pathology].

Markus D Herrmann1,2, Jochen K Lennerz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Innovative information technologies open new possibilities for diagnostics and promise to improve patient care. However, the integration of data- and computing-intensive procedures into diagnostic workflows also poses risks and considerable challenges for pathologists.
OBJECTIVES: Considering technical, operational, and regulatory aspects, we present a holistic and systematic approach for the adoption of digital and computational pathology.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We discuss challenges for the implementation of computational diagnostic procedures and analyze regulatory frameworks for risk-based assessment and monitoring of software as an in vitro diagnostic device. Applying regulatory science, we develop an approach to streamline adoption of digital workflows in pathology.
RESULTS: Data- and computing-intensive workflows in digital pathology are complex and underscore the need for computational and regulatory science as a central part of pathological diagnostics. To promote the adoption of computational diagnostics, we have founded an interdisciplinary initiative (the Alliance) that focuses on regulatory research in the field of digital pathology and works closely with a number of expert and interest groups on the precompetitive development of standards for computational workflows. DISCUSSION: The inclusion of different stakeholder groups and the coordination of technical, operational, and regulatory aspects is necessary to maintain the balance between progress and safety in diagnostics and to make innovations quickly and safely available for patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; In vitro diagnostics; Machine learning; Quality assurance; Regulatory science

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33263808     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-020-00871-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  4 in total

Review 1.  Digital imaging in pathology.

Authors:  Seung Park; Liron Pantanowitz; Anil Vasdev Parwani
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.935

2.  Implementing the DICOM Standard for Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Markus D Herrmann; David A Clunie; Andriy Fedorov; Sean W Doyle; Steven Pieper; Veronica Klepeis; Long P Le; George L Mutter; David S Milstone; Thomas J Schultz; Ron Kikinis; Gopal K Kotecha; David H Hwang; Katherine P Andriole; A John Iafrate; James A Brink; Giles W Boland; Keith J Dreyer; Mark Michalski; Jeffrey A Golden; David N Louis; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 3.  Computational pathology definitions, best practices, and recommendations for regulatory guidance: a white paper from the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Esther Abels; Liron Pantanowitz; Famke Aeffner; Mark D Zarella; Jeroen van der Laak; Marilyn M Bui; Venkata Np Vemuri; Anil V Parwani; Jeff Gibbs; Emmanuel Agosto-Arroyo; Andrew H Beck; Cleopatra Kozlowski
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  A Regulatory Science Initiative to Harmonize and Standardize Digital Pathology and Machine Learning Processes to Speed up Clinical Innovation to Patients.

Authors:  Hetal Desai Marble; Richard Huang; Sarah Nixon Dudgeon; Amanda Lowe; Markus D Herrmann; Scott Blakely; Matthew O Leavitt; Mike Isaacs; Matthew G Hanna; Ashish Sharma; Jithesh Veetil; Pamela Goldberg; Joachim H Schmid; Laura Lasiter; Brandon D Gallas; Esther Abels; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.