| Literature DB >> 33263699 |
Celivane Cavalcanti Barbosa1, Cristine Vieira do Bonfim2,3, Cintia Michele Gondim de Brito4, Wayner Vieira de Souza1, Marcella Fernandes de Oliveira Melo5, Zulma Maria de Medeiros4,6.
Abstract
Leprosy is a public health problem due to the physical disabilities and deformities it causes. This study aimed to describe new leprosy cases using an operational classification and analyzing spatial patterns by means of epidemiological and quality indicators of health services in Pernambuco State, Brazil, between 2005 and 2014. This was an ecological study performed in 184 municipalities grouped into 12 health regions units for analysis. To analyze spatial patterns, the Bayesian local empirical method and Moran's spatial autocorrelation indicator were applied and box and Moran maps were used. Individuals aged ≥15 years old, grade zero physical disability and complete remission as the treatment outcome were predominant in both paucibacillary and multibacillary cases, the only difference was the predominance of females (n=9,286; 63.00%) and males (n=8,564; 60.70%), respectively. These variables were correlated (p<0.05) with the operational classification. The overall detection rate showed three high-priority areas; the indicator rate of grade 2 physical disability revealed clusters in regions IV, V, and VI; and the indicator rate of cases with some degree of disability showed precarious municipalities in seven health regions. Pernambuco maintains an active chain of transmission and ongoing endemicity of leprosy. Therefore, spatial analysis methods allow the identification of priority areas for intervention, thereby supporting the disease elimination strategy.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33263699 PMCID: PMC7694541 DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946202062093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
Sociodemographic and economic characterization of the Health Regions in Pernambuco State, Brazil.
| Sociodemographic and economic variables | Pernambuco State | Health Regions | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X | XI | XII | ||
| Total Population (inhabitants) (2014) | 9,277,670.00 | 4,116,144.00 | 589,553.00 | 604,677.00 | 1.324,376.00 | 534,804.00 | 408.584,00 | 155,353.00 | 475,733.00 | 334,933.00 | 168,196.00 | 234,382.00 | 311,876.00 |
| Territorial area (inhabitants/Km²) | 98,068.02 | 3,721.31 | 3,223.69 | 4,746.26 | 11,343.77 | 7.234,52 | 13,695.64 | 6,809.72 | 14,655.74 | 14,154.06 | 4,308.57 | 12,258.36 | 1,916.40 |
| Demographic density (hab/Km²) | 97.45 | 1,137.92 | 186.39 | 130.93 | 121.39 | 75,34 | 31.04 | 21.68 | 34.42 | 25.14 | 48.22 | 19.58 | 164.40 |
| % of Households with Water Supply (General Network) | 76.02 | 84.17 | 66.32 | 68.93 | 74.21 | 61.51 | 60.47 | 72.48 | 84.88 | 53.41 | 65.62 | 63.03 | 73.78 |
| % of Households by Sanitary Installation (General sewage or pluvial network) | 43.65 | 41.95 | 21.66 | 36.93 | 62.56 | 39.37 | 46.14 | 47.57 | 53.95 | 30.30 | 54.98 | 45.19 | 31.22 |
| % of Households by Garbage Destination (Collected) | 81.59 | 93.58 | 67.61 | 71.81 | 82.04 | 64.95 | 60.62 | 64.21 | 75.71 | 51.76 | 66.37 | 58.06 | 83.52 |
| Average GDP per capita (R$ billions) | 19,164.52 | 25,553.09 | 10,638.03 | 9,006.95 | 10,219.04 | 10.643,88 | 10,393.80 | 8,728.73 | 12,140.63 | 8,043.82 | 8,055.10 | 9,227.01 | 21,939.22 |
| GDP current values (R$ Millions) | 181,550,642.01 | 110,548,005.85 | 7,075,390.28 | 5,914,446.17 | 18,512,672.31 | 6.378.284,35 | 4,633,499.31 | 1,508,482.81 | 7,770,932.03 | 3,130,419.70 | 139,658.32 | 2,680,350.49 | 11,722,258.88 |
| Life Expectancy at Sunrise (mean) | 71.10 | 72.84 | 70.92 | 69.46 | 70.47 | 68.59 | 69.23 | 70.68 | 70.59 | 70.53 | 69.93 | 70.69 | 70.25 |
| Human Development Index (HDI) (mean) | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| % Literacy | 72.20 | 68.71 | 67.91 | 61.19 | 63,17 | 60.45 | 63.46 | 66.83 | 63.12 | 66.20 | 69.71 | 66.00 | 65.46 |
| National Health Service (SUS) dependent population (inhabitants) | 8,168,411.00 | 3,132,705.00 | 584,763.00 | 606,564.00 | 1,272,624.00 | 515.396,00 | 411,507.00 | 143,794.00 | 430,289.00 | 348,443.00 | 187,171.00 | 233,314.00 | 301,937.00 |
| % dependent SUS population | 86.02 | 74.43 | 97.70 | 98.18 | 93.21 | 94.94 | 97.63 | 97.82 | 86.42 | 98.53 | 99.06 | 97.71 | 96.01 |
| % Population coverage estimated by Community Health Agents Teams | 84.57 | 83.93 | 99.45 | 98.51 | 94.10 | 99.43 | 96.95 | 100.00 | 96.42 | 99.04 | 100.00 | 98.96 | 100.00 |
| % Population coverage estimated by Family Health Teams | 80.56 | 82.52 | 99.03 | 92.94 | 90.55 | 99.25 | 93.54 | 91.69 | 91.87 | 89.17 | 100.00 | 89.35 | 97.89 |
Demographic and clinical variables of new leprosy cases, according to the operational classification, in Pernambuco State, from 2005 to 2014.
| Variables | Operational classification |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paucibacillary | Multibacillary | |||||
| N (14,740) | % | N (14,109) | % | |||
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| Female | 9,286 | 63.00 | 5,545 | 39.30 | ||
| Male | 5,454 | 37.00 | 8,564 | 60.70 | ||
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| 0–14 years | 2,184 | 14.82 | 883 | 6.26 | ||
| ≥15 years | 12,556 | 85.18 | 13,226 | 93.74 | ||
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| Grade 0 | 12,065 | 81.85 | 7,843 | 55.59 | ||
| Grade 1 | 1,501 | 10.18 | 3,430 | 24.31 | ||
| Grade 2 | 180 | 1.22 | 1,290 | 9.14 | ||
| Not assessed | 654 | 4.44 | 1,006 | 7.13 | ||
| Not known | 340 | 2.31 | 540 | 3.83 | ||
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| Cure | 13,285 | 90.13 | 11,535 | 81.76 | ||
| Transfers | 498 | 3.38 | 905 | 6.41 | ||
| Death | 55 | 0.37 | 293 | 2.08 | ||
| Abandonment | 732 | 4.97 | 940 | 6.66 | ||
| Not known | 170 | 1.15 | 436 | 3.09 | ||
Figure 1Spatial analysis of the mean detection rate of new leprosy cases: rate smoothed by the Bayesian local empiric method (A) and Moran map (B), per 100,000 inhabitants and per municipality. Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2005-2014.
Figure 2Spatial analysis on the mean rate of leprosy cases with grade 2 physical disability at the time of diagnosis among new cases detected and evaluated: rate smoothed by the Bayesian local empiric method (A) and Moran map (B). Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2005-2014.
Figure 3Spatial analysis on the mean rate of new leprosy cases with some degree of physical disability assessed at the time of diagnosis: rate smoothed by the Bayesian local empiric method (A) and Moran map (B), per municipality. Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2005-2014.