Literature DB >> 33263392

3D Printing: An Alternative Microfabrication Approach with Unprecedented Opportunities in Design.

Hari Kalathil Balakrishnan1,2, Faizan Badar3, Egan H Doeven1, James I Novak3, Andrea Merenda2, Ludovic F Dumée2,4,5,6, Jennifer Loy3, Rosanne M Guijt1.   

Abstract

In the past decade, 3D printing technologies have been adopted for the fabrication of microfluidic devices. Extrusion-based approaches including fused filament fabrication (FFF), jetting technologies including inkjet 3D printing, and vat photopolymerization techniques including stereolithography (SLA) and digital light projection (DLP) are the 3D printing methods most frequently adopted by the microfluidic community. Each printing technique has merits toward the fabrication of microfluidic devices. Inkjet printing offers a good selection of materials and multimaterial printing, and the large build space provides manufacturing throughput, while FFF offers a great selection of materials and multimaterial printing but at lower throughput compared to inkjet 3D printing. Technical and material developments adopted from adjacent research fields and developed by the microfluidic community underpin the printing of sub-100 μm enclosed microchannels by DLP, but challenges remain in multimaterial printing throughput. With the feasibility of 3D printed microfluidics established, we look ahead at trends in 3D printing to gain insights toward the future of this technology beyond the sole prism of being an alternative fabrication approach. A shift in emphasis from using 3D printing for prototyping, to mimic conventionally manufactured outputs, toward integrated approaches from a design perspective is critically developed.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33263392     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  5 in total

1.  Integration of thermal imaging and neural networks for mechanical strength analysis and fracture prediction in 3D-printed plastic parts.

Authors:  Daniil A Boiko; Victoria A Korabelnikova; Evgeniy G Gordeev; Valentine P Ananikov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It?

Authors:  Bastien Venzac; Shanliang Deng; Ziad Mahmoud; Aufried Lenferink; Aurélie Costa; Fabrice Bray; Cees Otto; Christian Rolando; Séverine Le Gac
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Time-efficient fabrication method for 3D-printed microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Yan Jin; Peng Xiong; Tongyu Xu; Jingyi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Hand-Powered Inertial Microfluidic Syringe-Tip Centrifuge.

Authors:  Nan Xiang; Zhonghua Ni
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29

Review 5.  A Review on Additive Manufacturing of Micromixing Devices.

Authors:  Marina Garcia-Cardosa; Francisco-Javier Granados-Ortiz; Joaquín Ortega-Casanova
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.891

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.