| Literature DB >> 33263330 |
Sandra Kozak1, Yehudi Bloch2, Steven De Munck2, Aleksandra Mikula1, Isabel Bento1, Savvas N Savvides2, Rob Meijers1.
Abstract
Structural studies of glycoproteins and their complexes provide critical insights into their roles in normal physiology and disease. Most glycoproteins contain N-linked glycosylation, a key post-translation modification that critically affects protein folding and stability and the binding kinetics underlying protein interactions. However, N-linked glycosylation is often an impediment to yielding homogeneous protein preparations for structure determination by X-ray crystallography or other methods. In particular, obtaining diffraction-quality crystals of such proteins and their complexes often requires modification of both the type of glycosylation patterns and their extent. Here, we demonstrate the benefits of producing target glycoproteins in the GlycoDelete human embryonic kidney 293 cell line that has been engineered to produce N-glycans as short glycan stumps comprising N-acetylglucosamine, galactose and sialic acid. Protein fragments of human Down syndrome cell-adhesion molecule and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor were obtained from the GlycoDelete cell line for crystallization. The ensuing reduction in the extent and complexity of N-glycosylation in both protein molecules compared with alternative glycoengineering approaches enabled their productive deployment in structural studies by X-ray crystallography. Furthermore, a third successful implementation of the GlycoDelete technology focusing on murine IL-12B is shown to lead to N-glycosylation featuring an immature glycan in diffraction-quality crystals. It is proposed that the GlycoDelete cell line could serve as a valuable go-to option for the production of homogeneous glycoproteins and their complexes for structural studies by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. open access.Entities:
Keywords: GlycoDelete cell line; cell-surface receptors; crystallization; glycoproteins; glycosylation; synthetic biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33263330 PMCID: PMC7709199 DOI: 10.1107/S2059798320013753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol ISSN: 2059-7983 Impact factor: 7.652
Crystallization conditions for DSCAMIg7–Ig9 for the wild-type and GD-derived proteins
| HEK293T | HEK293 GlycoDelete | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein sample | 5 mg ml−1 in 20 m | 7.5 mg ml−1 in 20 m |
| Initial crystal |
|
|
| Screen | The PEGs II Suite | The PEGs II Suite |
| Condition | H9: 0.05 | H8: 0.2 |
| Protein sample | 7 mg ml−1 in 20 m | 7 mg ml−1 in 20 m |
| Optimized condition | 0.05 | 0.2 |
| Optimized crystal mounted in a cryo-loop |
|
|
| Diffraction pattern |
|
|
| Diffraction limit (Å) | ∼8 | 1.85 |
Crystallographic data-collection and refinement statistics
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| DSCAMIg7–Ig9 | IL-12B | CSF-1–CSF-1RD1–D3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.976 | 1.033 | 0.976 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 84.81–1.85 (1.89–1.85) | 67.41–2.40 (2.49–2.40) | 49.71–2.80 (2.97–2.80) |
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
| 78.6, 71.4, 92.2 | 85.88, 85.88, 107.67 | 143.00, 143.00, 138.32 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90, 113.1, 90 | 90, 90, 90 | 90, 90, 90 |
| Total reflections | 148955 (9215) | 123592 (9760) | 235463 (37046) |
| Unique reflections | 39662 (2418) | 15233 (1486) | 34125 (5448) |
| Multiplicity | 3.8 (3.8) | 8.11 (6.6) | 6.9 (6.8) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.0 (97.4) | 99.7 (97.4) | 99.8 (99.2) |
| Mean | 12.8 (1.6) | 12.2 (0.8) | 20.7 (2.3) |
| Wilson | 43.1 | 60.25 | 82.3 |
|
| 0.044 (0.874) | 0.117 (1.564) | 0.059 (0.864) |
|
| 0.051 (1.011) | 0.125 (1.698) | 0.064 (0.815) |
|
| 0.026 (0.502) | 0.044 (0.649) | 0.024 (0.351) |
| CC1/2 | 1.0 (0.7) | 0.998 (0.487) | 0.999 (0.74) |
| Reflections used in refinement | 37658 (2753) | 15215 (1480) | 34116 (3318) |
| Reflections used for | 2001 (153) | 1511 (144) | 1706 (165) |
|
| 0.189 (0.289) | 0.229 (0.365) | 0.223 (0.409) |
|
| 0.217 (0.303) | 0.265(0.437) | 0.261 (0.465) |
| No. of non-H atoms | |||
| Total | 2564 | 2412 | 6657 |
| Macromolecules | 2281 | 2306 | 6370 |
| Ligands | 116 | 73 | 287 |
| Solvent | 167 | 33 | n.a. |
| No. of protein residues | 292 | 295 | 833 |
| R.m.s.d., bond lengths (Å) | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| R.m.s.d., angles (°) | 1.80 | 1.04 | 1.094 |
| Ramachandran favored (%) | 96.9 | 95.79 | 95.6 |
| Ramachandran allowed (%) | 3.1 | 4.21 | 4.4 |
| Ramachandran outliers (%) | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
| Average | |||
| Overall | 36.9 | 66.8 | 100.3 |
| Macromolecules | 33.2 | 66.4 | 97.4 |
| Ligands | 74.8 | 85.7 | 164.6 |
| Solvent | 60.4 | 56.0 | n.a. |
| No. of TLS groups | 4 | n.a. | 18 |
| PDB code |
|
|
|
Figure 1Structural analysis of DSCAMIg7–Ig9 derived from HEK293 GD. (a) Comparison of HEK293T and HEK293 GD-derived DSCAMIg7–Ig9; the inset shows reduced SDS–PAGE analysis of the purified proteins. (b) Cartoon representation showing four copies of DSCAMIg7–Ig9 that form an oligomer by crystallographic symmetry around the glycan stub. The asymmetric unit contains a single copy. (c) Detailed view of the accommodation of the glycan stub at residue Asn795 in the Ig7–Ig9 interface. The inset shows a schematic representation of the glycan. (d) An OMIT map of the same glycan stub contoured at 3σ. (e) Representative electron density around the glycan at position Asn795. The 2mF o − DF c electron-density map is shown as a gray mesh (contoured at 1σ). Residual positive and negative mF o − DF c electron-density maps (contoured at ±3σ) are shown in green and red, respectively.
Figure 2Structural analysis of CSF-1RD1–D3 derived from HEK293 GD. (a) Comparison of HEK293T and HEK293 GD-derived CSF-1RD1–D3; the inset shows reduced SDS–PAGE analysis of the purified proteins. (b) Van der Waals contacts between GD-type glycans on Asn275. (c) Crystal-packing contacts between symmetry-related glycans. The inset shows a schematic representation of the glycan. (d) The GD-type glycan on Asn73 is α-1,6-fucosylated. The 2mF o − DF c electron-density map is shown as a gray mesh. Residual positive and negative mF o − DF c electron-density maps (contoured at ±3σ) are shown in green and red, respectively.
Figure 3Structural analysis of IL-12B derived from HEK293 GD. (a) Comparison of HEK293T and HEK293 GD-derived IL-12B; the inset shows SDS–PAGE analysis of the purified proteins under reducing conditions. (b) Cartoon representation of the IL-12B homodimer formed through crystallographic symmetry (a twofold crystallographic axis is present at Cys197). (c) Close-up of the immature N-linked glycan present on Asn220 and its extensive interactions with the neighboring protein. The inset shows a schematic representation of the glycan; the mannose residues that could not be readily identified in the electron density are partially transparent. (d) Representative electron density around the glycan at position Asn220. Density at the top left belongs to a symmetry mate. The 2mF o − DF c electron-density map is shown as a gray mesh. Residual positive and negative mF o − DF c electron-density maps (contoured at ±3σ) are shown in green and red, respectively.