| Literature DB >> 33263016 |
Qien Qi1,2, Qiaoli Peng1, Min Tang3, Dongling Chen3, Huihua Zhang1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of fermented spent mushroom substrates (FSMS) on growth performance, serum biochemical, gut digestive enzyme activity, microbial community, genes expression of tight junction proteins, and volatile fatty acids in the hindgut (colon and cecum) of weaned piglets. A total of 100 weaned Yihao native pigs (native × Duroc, 50 males and 50 females) were allocated to two groups with five replicates and 10 pigs per replicate. Pigs in the control group were fed a basal diet (BD group), and the others were fed basal diets supplemented with 3% FSMS (FSMS group). Relative to the BD group, it had better results for final weight, average daily gain, and feed conversion ratio in the FSMS group but not significant (p > 0.05), which was accompanied by improved serum triiodothyronine, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin A (p < 0.05) but lower serum total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, and total triglyceride during the overall period (p < 0.05). Similarly, FSMS significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) the messenger RNA expression of duodenal tight junction proteins such as tight junction protein 1, tight junction protein 2, and occludin. Meanwhile, isobutyric acid, valeric acid, and isovaleric acid levels were increased, whereas propanoic acid was decreased (p < 0.05) in the FSMS group than the BD group. In addition, the piglets in the FSMS group changed the microbial diversity in the colon and cecum. 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based compositional analysis of the colonic and cecal microbiota showed differences in the relative abundance of bacterial phyla (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, etc.), genus (Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Roseburia, etc.), and species (Lactobacillus gasseri, Clostridium disporicum, etc.) between the BD and FSMS fed piglets. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with FSMS benefited to the intestinal mucosal barrier, immunity, and composition of the microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: fermented spent mushroom substrates; immunity; intestinal health; microbiota; weaned piglets
Year: 2020 PMID: 33263016 PMCID: PMC7686581 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.584243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Composition and nutrient levels of the diets (%, as-fed basis).
| Fermented | 3.00 | |
| Corn (for suckling pigs) | 38.00 | 36.86 |
| Extruded corn | 24.00 | 23.28 |
| Whey powder | 10.00 | 9.70 |
| Soybean meal | 11.00 | 10.67 |
| Fermented soybean meal | 9.00 | 8.73 |
| Fish meal | 4.00 | 3.88 |
| premix | 4.00 | 3.88 |
| DE (kcal/kg) | 3,403.18 | 3,401.46 |
| Crude protein (%) | 18.91 | 18.90 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 1.98 | 2.16 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| M + C (%) | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Threonine (%) | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Tryptophan (%) | 0.22 | 0.21 |
Provided per kilogram of complete diet: vitamin A, 25,000 IU; vitamin D3, 75,000 IU; vitamin E, 350 mg; vitamin K3, 150 mg; niacin, 700 mg; D-pantothenate, 520 mg; vitamin B2, 170 mg; vitamin B6, 100 mg; vitamin B12, 1 mg; folic acid, 170 mg; D-biotin, 1.7 mg; choline chloride, 400 mg; Mn (MnSO.
Nutritional components of fermented spent mushroom substrates (FSMS): estimated DE, 3,346 kcal/kg; crude protein, 18.5%; crude fiber, 8%; small peptide, 8.93%; lysine, 0.66%; methionine, 0.2%; threonine, 0.62%; tryptophan, 0.73%; valine, 0.96%; leucine, 1.12%.
Influence of FSMS addition on porcine growth performance indexes.
| Sample | 50 | 50 | |
| Initial weight (kg) | 4.15 ± 0.45 | 4.05 ± 0.43 | 0.898 |
| Final weight (kg) | 14.69 ± 1.29 | 15.08 ± 1.06 | 0.836 |
| ADG (g) | 301.28 ± 24.86 | 315.00 ± 18.01 | 0.816 |
| FCR | 1.33 ± 0.02 | 1.29 ± 0.01 | 0.092 |
Influence of FSMS addition on porcine blood biochemical indexes.
| IgG (mg/ml) | 21.4 ± 2.86b | 32.23 ± 3.39a | 0.001 |
| IgA (ug/ml) | 679.06 ± 140.27b | 866.00 ± 50.21a | 0.026 |
| T3 (pmol/L) | 11.52 ± 1.94b | 14.73 ± 1.69a | 0.017 |
| T4 (pmol/L) | 45.71 ± 4.98 | 50.47 ± 2.71 | 0.108 |
| IGF-1 (ng/ml) | 595.19 ± 72.79 | 754.35 ± 148.68 | 0.103 |
| TP (mg/ml) | 66.39 ± 10.05a | 49.61 ± 7.43b | 0.017 |
| ALB (g/L) | 30.13 ± 7.12a | 21.06 ± 1.94b | 0.025 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 7.69 ± 1.89a | 5.46 ± 0.87b | 0.049 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 4.37 ± 2.17a | 1.62 ± 0.37b | 0.023 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 4.03 ± 0.45 | 3.73 ± 0.73 | 0.470 |
IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgA, immunoglobulin A; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, tetraiodothyronine; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; BUN, blood urea nitrogen. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Results were analyzed by t-test, and the variant letter in the same row indicated a significant difference when P < 0.05.
Influence of FSMS addition on porcine duodenum content digestive enzyme activities.
| Trypsin (U/mg) | 12.71 ± 8.05 | 46.32 ± 37.89 | 0.200 |
| Lipase (U/g) | 203.31 ± 203.59 | 214.87 ± 45.03 | 0.915 |
| α-Amylase (mmol/L) | 6264.89 ± 389.63 | 5846.31 ± 641.09 | 0.328 |
| β-Amylase (mmol/L) | 79.06 ± 11.89 | 79.81 ± 5.32 | 0.901 |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Results were analyzed by the t-test, and the variant letter in the same row indicated a significant difference when P < 0.05.
Figure 1Influence of FSMS addition on the tight junction transmembrane protein, tight junction protein 1 (TJP1), tight junction protein 2 (TJP2), and occludin (OCLN) mRNA expression. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Influence of FSMS addition on porcine colon digesta volatility fatty acids (VFAs) production.
| Acetic acid (mmol/L) | 59.59 ± 5.78 | 50.93 ± 11.03 | 0.170 |
| Propanoic acid (mmol/L) | 26.16 ± 1.74a | 19.38 ± 6.55b | 0.036 |
| Butyric acid (mmol/L) | 5.99 ± 0.84 | 4.37 ± 1.28 | 0.056 |
| Isobutyric acid (mmol/L) | 0.38 ± 0.17b | 1.95 ± 0.33a | 0.000 |
| Valeric acid (mmol/L) | 0.78 ± 0.12b | 1.34 ± 0.53a | 0.050 |
| Isovaleric acid (mmol/L) | 0.62 ± 0.13b | 2.58 ± 0.50a | 0.000 |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Results were analyzed by the t-test, and the variant letter in the same row indicated a significant difference when P < 0.05.
Figure 2Relative abundance of bacterial phylum in the cecal digesta of pigs (A). Significantly changed phyla in the cecal digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Relative abundance of bacterial phylum in the colonic digesta of pigs (A). Significant changed phyla in the colonic digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 4Relative abundance of bacterial genus in the cecal digesta of pigs (A). Significant changed genera in the cecal digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5Relative abundance of bacterial genus in the colonic digesta of pigs (A). Significant changed genera in the colonic digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 6Relative abundance of bacterial species in the cecal digesta of pigs (A). Significant changed species in the cecal digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 7Relative abundance of bacterial species in the colonic digesta of pigs (A). Significant changed species in the colonic digesta (B). Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.