| Literature DB >> 33262938 |
Takayuki Mizorogi1,2, Motoo Kobayashi2, Kenji Ohara1,3, Yuki Okada1, Ichiro Yamamoto1, Toshiro Arai1, Koh Kawasumi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Animals tend to increase in body weight and body condition score (BCS) with aging. Serum diagnostic markers related to energy metabolism may show changes even in healthy cats with aging.Entities:
Keywords: M/L ratio; SAA; aging; domestic cats; obesity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33262938 PMCID: PMC7695597 DOI: 10.2147/VMRR.S277208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med (Auckl) ISSN: 2230-2034
Profile of the Age, Breed and Gender of 70 Cats in This Study
| Breed | Junior | Prime | Mature | Senior | Geriatric-Obese | Geriatric-Thin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (range) | 7 months-2 years | 3–6 years | 7–10 years | 11–14 years | >15 years | >15 years | |
| Mix | 11 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 45 |
| Scottish Fold | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Munchkin | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Japanese Cat | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| American Shorthair | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Ragdoll | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Selkirk Rex | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Norwegian Forest Cat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Persian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 70 |
The Profile of Biomarkers of 8 Cats with Clinical Symptoms
| No. | Group | Age (Years) | BW (kg) | BCS | TP | ALB | AST | ALT | ALP | γ-GTP | BUN | CRE | GLU | TG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | prime | 3.6 | 3.31 | 5 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 24 | 39 | 69 | 0.5 | 31 | 2.1 | 83 | 21 |
| 2 | prime | 5.6 | 5.58 | 7 | 6.5 | 3 | 30 | 58 | 52 | 0.1 | 20 | 1.4 | 95 | 16 |
| 3 | Mature | 9.3 | 5.06 | 7 | 7.2 | 3.4 | 15 | 30 | 66 | 0.6 | 21 | 1.4 | 73 | 23 |
| 4 | Mature | 10.7 | 5.00 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 21 | 36 | 101 | 0.1 | 20 | 1 | 154 | 35 |
| 5 | Senior | 12.3 | 5.75 | 6 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 18 | 47 | 53 | 0.7 | 24 | 1.3 | 173 | 44 |
| 6 | Senior | 13.2 | 2.80 | 4 | 8.3 | 2.8 | 27 | 28 | 68 | 0.1 | 19 | 1.1 | 107 | 9 |
| 7 | Geriatric-obese | 15.8 | 3.38 | 5 | 7.1 | 2.7 | 32 | 29 | 59 | 0.3 | 100 | 3.5 | 96 | 25 |
| 8 | Geriatric-thin | 16.2 | 2.72 | 3 | 7.2 | 3.2 | 17 | 30 | 54 | 0.2 | 34 | 1.4 | 152 | 17 |
Changes in Biomarkers Among Different Ages in 70 Cats
| Junior (16) | Prime (14) | Mature (20) | Senior (14) | Geriatric-Obese (3) | Geriatric-Thin (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (range) | 7month to 2 years | 3 years to 6 years | 7 years to 10 years | 11 years to 14 years | 15 years < | 15 years < |
| Age (Av) | 1.9±0.6 | 4.6±1.1 | 9.0±1.3 | 12.1±0.9 | 15.9±0.5 | 16.6±0.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 4.3±0.7 | 4.2±0.9 | 5.0±1.4 | 4.9±1.3 | 4.2±0.9 | 3.3±0.4 |
| BCS | 5.7±0.8 | 5.6±0.8 | 6.6±1.3* | 6.6±1.6* | 6.3±0.5 | 3.7±0.5** |
| GLU (mg 100mL−1) | 103.9±20.3 | 107.7±24.7 | 139.1±48.4* | 137.7±29.5** | 150.3±58.2* | 128.3±22.0 |
| AST (IU L−1) | 28.1±13.7 | 27.8±5.7 | 25.9±7.7 | 25.8±8.4 | 27.3±3.3 | 21.3±4.2 |
| ALT (IU L−1) | 66.5±65.1 | 52.9±15.0 | 47.6±22.1 | 47.9±28.7 | 36.3±5.7 | 34.7±6.6 |
| TG (mg 100mL−1) | 44.2±32.1 | 37.5±26.0 | 59.8±65.3 | 137.5±146.3* | 28.7±5.9 | 27.7±9.5 |
| SAA (ng mL−1) | 28.2±54.3 | 22.4±34.4 | 57.1±119.3 | 83.4±163.1 | 103.4±116.2 | 215.1±155.7* |
| ADN (µg mL−1) | 5.9±4.1 | 5.2±3.8 | 4.7±2.7 | 3.8±4.2 | 7.3±1.4 | 5.0±1.1 |
| LDH (IU L−1) | 79.6±33.4 | 54.3±35.2 | 49.5±26.1** | 62.2±39.6 | 42.5±18.9 | 31.4±9.8* |
| MDH (IU L−1) | 39.3±67.1 | 20.9±26.0 | 8.6±4.8 | 21.0±39.7 | 9.3±6.0 | 6.9±2.4 |
| M/L | 0.470±0.678 | 0.496±0.614 | 0.226±0.179 | 0.293±0.300 | 0.343±0.282 | 0.272±0.172 |
| TP (g 100mL−1) | 7.4±0.9 | 7.5±0.4 | 7.6±0.6 | 7.6±0.5 | 7.2±0.0 | 7.4±0.2 |
| ALB (g 100mL−1) | 3.4±0.3 | 3.4±0.3 | 3.3±0.3 | 3.3±0.3 | 2.9±0.1* | 3.2±0.0 |
| ALP (IU L−1) | 116.3±51.8 | 81.6±39.2 | 87.4±23.7* | 81.6±26.5* | 69.0±11.4 | 95.3±52.2 |
| γ-GPT (IU L−1) | 0.2±0.2 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.3±0.2 | 0.2±0.2 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 |
| BUN (mg 100mL−1) | 26.1±4.2 | 26.0±4.1 | 26.1±5.1 | 27.5±5.0 | 57.7±30.1** | 31.7±2.1* |
| CRE (mg 100mL−1) | 1.5±0.4 | 1.5±0.3 | 1.5±0.3 | 1.4±0.2 | 2.4±0.8* | 1.8±0.5 |
Notes: Data are expressed mean ± standard deviation (SD). *Significant (P < 0.05) when compared against Junior group (One-way ANOVA). **Significant (P < 0.01) when compared against Junior group (One-way ANOVA). The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of animals examined.
The Profile of Biomarkers of 8 Cats with Clinical Symptoms
| No. | Group | SAA | ADN | LDH | MDH | M/L | Clinical Symptoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | prime | over | 7.2 | 43.3 | 107.6 | 2.483 | Periodontal disease (mild calculus, gingivitis) |
| 2 | prime | over | 5.3 | 38.2 | 8.1 | 0.211 | Periodontal disease (mild calculus), kidney internal structure irregularity |
| 3 | Mature | 218.4 | 4.0 | 43.3 | 12.6 | 0.290 | Periodontal disease / Recurrent cystitis |
| 4 | Mature | 486.4 | 3.9 | 61.2 | 6.3 | 0.102 | Hyperglycemia (stress?) L1 vertebral deformity, mild periodontal disease |
| 5 | Senior | 601.4 | 2.2 | 66.3 | 1.8 | 0.027 | Hip dysplasia, periodontal disease, pancreatitis in the past, hyperglycemia (stress?) |
| 6 | Senior | 206.0 | 2.0 | 132.6 | 13.5 | 0.101 | Early renal function decline |
| 7 | Geriatric-obese | 265.8 | 8.4 | 45.9 | 14.4 | 0.313 | Moderately impaired renal function / periodontal disease / traumatic hair loss |
| 8 | Geriatric-thin | over | 5.0 | 17.8 | 9.0 | 0.502 | Bacterial cystitis (bacterial bladder infection), pancreatic tumor,6 lumbar vertebrae (congenital), binocular sclerosis, periodontal disease |
Correlation Coefficients and P values Between the Age and Examined Parameters in This Study
| Correlation | Coefficient | P value |
|---|---|---|
| BCS (70) | 0.035 | 0.771 |
| GLU (70) | 0.351 | 0.003** |
| TG (66) | 0.192 | 0.122 |
| SAA (60) | 0.320 | 0.013* |
| ADN (64) | -0.131 | 0.302 |
| TP (70) | 0.048 | 0.693 |
| ALB (70) | -0.306 | 0.010** |
| LDH (66) | -0.297 | 0.016* |
| MDH (64) | -0.204 | 0.105 |
| M/L ratio (64) | -0.142 | 0.263 |
| AST (70) | -0.115 | 0.341 |
| ALT (70) | -0.193 | 0.109 |
| ALP (70) | -0.237 | 0.049* |
| γGTP (70) | 0.128 | 0.289 |
| CRE (70) | 0.156 | 0.198 |
| BUN (70) | 0.306 | 0.010** |
Notes: Correlation coefficients were calculated by multivariate regression analysis. *Significance level was set at P < 0.05. **Significance level was set at P < 0.01. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of animals examined.