Literature DB >> 33262454

Structure-based development of human antibody cocktails against SARS-CoV-2.

Nan Wang1,2, Yao Sun1, Rui Feng1,2, Yuxi Wang3, Yan Guo4, Li Zhang5, Yong-Qiang Deng4, Lei Wang1, Zhen Cui1, Lei Cao1, Yan-Jun Zhang6, Weimin Li7, Feng-Cai Zhu8, Cheng-Feng Qin9, Xiangxi Wang10,11,12.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33262454      PMCID: PMC7705432          DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-00446-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in unprecedented public health and socioeconomic crises, requiring urgent developments of effective COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines. Humoral immunity is essential for protection against coronavirus infections and passive immunization has been demonstrated to be effective in curing SARS-CoV-2-challenged nonhuman primates.[1,2] A deep understanding of the molecular basis of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses to SARS-CoV-2 could facilitate vaccine design and drug discovery. Spike (S) protein, the major protective antigen, utilizes its receptor-binding domain (RBD) to engage the host receptor ACE2 for viral entry into host cell. Subsequently, a number of RBD-targeting NAbs against SARS-CoV-2, which block the binding of S to ACE2 have been reported and characterized.[2-5] However, a major concern is the emergence of numerous viral mutations within RBD, in particular, when selective pressure is applied in immunotherapies, resulting in resistance against these antibodies. Recently, two antibodies targeting N-terminal domain (NTD) of S exhibited potent neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV-2.[6,7] When used in combination with RBD-targeting and NTD-directing NAbs, the protective effect was magnified.[5,6] Thus, a combination of antibodies could not only increase the potency of protection, but also prevent viral escape of immune responses via mutations. These preliminary results highlight the benefits of using a cocktail of antibodies for treating COVID-19 and provide a framework for rational design of antibody cocktail therapeutics that target both RBD and NTD regions. Furthermore, the structural characterizations of S in complex with potential NAb cocktails reported recently inform strategies for the development of vaccines for protection against COVID-19. Successful antibody cocktail therapeutics for Ebola were generated by mixing NAbs from humanized antibodies from mice and human survivors. This indicates that NAb diversity plays critical roles in the design of antibody cocktails, and that this diversity can be achieved through various approaches. We have recently described parallel efforts, involving use of humanized antibodies developed from libraries of mouse origin and antibodies screened from libraries constructed from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of convalescent humans. A large collection of highly potent NAbs targeting both RBD and NTD of SARS-CoV-2 S protein were obtained.[3-6] Among these, two humanized RBD-targeting NAbs, named H014 and HB27, are pan-SARS-CoVs cross-reactive and SARS-CoV-2-specific NAbs, respectively.[3,4] The other two fully human NAbs, FC05 and P17, recognize NTD and RBD of S, respectively.[5,6] All four NAbs individually exhibited potent neutralizing activities at sub-nM concentrations and conferred effective protection against SARS-CoV-2 in animal models.[3-6] These preliminary results allowed us to rationally design two-antibody cocktails of the NTD-targeting FC05 in combination with the RBD-targeting NAbs. We firstly evaluated the simultaneous binding of FC05 and three RBD-directing NAbs to S by competitive surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The CM5 sensor labeled with SARS-CoV-2 S trimer was saturated with FC05 and flooded with H014 or HB27 or P17 in the flow through (Fig. 1a). As expected, the binding of FC05 does not affect the attachment of any of the three RBD-specific NAbs to the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer, underlining the potential of these antibodies in formulating cooperative two-antibody cocktails as they bind simultaneously to distinct domains (Fig. 1a). Although more recently, synergistic effects between pairs of non-competing RBD-targeting NAbs have been reported for SARS-CoV-2, such as a pair consisting of H014 and P17,[5] combinations of FC05 and H014 or HB27 or P17 that bind to NTD and RBD, respectively, of S, provide opportunities to develop more optimal antibody cocktail therapeutics for COVID-19.
Fig. 1

Structural basis for cooperativity in antibody cocktails.

a SPR kinetics of competitive binding of two-antibody cocktails of FC05 and H014, FC05 and HB27 or FC05 and P17 to SARS-CoV-2 S. For all kinetics, S was immobilized onto sensor; FC05 was first injected, followed by H014 (upper), HB27 (middle) or P17 (lower). Control groups are depicted by blue curves. b Orthogonal views of FC05–H014–S (upper), FC05–HB27–S (middle), and FC05–P17–S (lower). Open-state RBD, and close-state RBD are labeled with O-RBD and C-RBD, respectively. c Surface representation of the S monomer or RBD. The areas buried by FC05, H014, HB27, and P17 epitopes are marked in purple, forest green, sky blue, and red lines, respectively. Sequence identities and differences between the S of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are shown in pink and green, respectively, mapped on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 S/RBD. The overlapped residues of HB27 and H014 epitopes are marked with red cycles. d P17 and FC05 Fabs mimic the two “arms” of a single IgG molecule to bind S. A structure-based bivalent antibody is modeled. Fc, NTD, RBD, S2, P17 and FC05 are labeled. e Superimpositions of complex structures of S–P17 and S–HB27 as well as S–H014. Steric clashes between HB27 and P17 are highlighted with red cycles. f, g Orthogonal views of a three-antibody cocktail of FC05, H014, and P17 (f) and a four-antibody combination of FC05, H014, P17 and S309 (g).

Structural basis for cooperativity in antibody cocktails.

a SPR kinetics of competitive binding of two-antibody cocktails of FC05 and H014, FC05 and HB27 or FC05 and P17 to SARS-CoV-2 S. For all kinetics, S was immobilized onto sensor; FC05 was first injected, followed by H014 (upper), HB27 (middle) or P17 (lower). Control groups are depicted by blue curves. b Orthogonal views of FC05–H014–S (upper), FC05–HB27–S (middle), and FC05–P17–S (lower). Open-state RBD, and close-state RBD are labeled with O-RBD and C-RBD, respectively. c Surface representation of the S monomer or RBD. The areas buried by FC05, H014, HB27, and P17 epitopes are marked in purple, forest green, sky blue, and red lines, respectively. Sequence identities and differences between the S of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are shown in pink and green, respectively, mapped on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 S/RBD. The overlapped residues of HB27 and H014 epitopes are marked with red cycles. d P17 and FC05 Fabs mimic the two “arms” of a single IgG molecule to bind S. A structure-based bivalent antibody is modeled. Fc, NTD, RBD, S2, P17 and FC05 are labeled. e Superimpositions of complex structures of S–P17 and S–HB27 as well as S–H014. Steric clashes between HB27 and P17 are highlighted with red cycles. f, g Orthogonal views of a three-antibody cocktail of FC05, H014, and P17 (f) and a four-antibody combination of FC05, H014, P17 and S309 (g). A deep understanding of the molecular basis for synergistic neutralization by antibodies of cocktails and the identification of additional neutralizing epitopes for a hypothetical 3rd or 4th antibody partner to further reinforce the cocktail would aid the development of powerful rationally designed vaccine and therapeutics. Structural investigations of mechanisms underlying the cooperativity between the antibodies of cocktails during neutralization via targeting different domains, however, have not yet been carried out for SARS-CoV-2. In our previous studies, near-atomic structures of a prefusion stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in complex with individual Fab fragment (FC05 or H014 or HB27 or P17) have been determined by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and epitopes for these four NAbs have been well characterized.[3-6] Here, we further performed cryo-EM analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in complex with three pairs of antibody cocktails (FC05 and H014; FC05 and HB27; FC05 and P17) with overall resolution of 3.4 Å–3.7 Å (Fig. 1b; Supplementary information, Figs. S1–S3 and Table S1). For each two-antibody cocktail, there are in total six copies of Fabs bound to one S trimer, where three FC05 Fabs bind on the side of each NTD and three RBD-directing Fabs bind at the side (H014) or top of each RBD (HB27 and P17), shielding most of the regions of S1 (Fig. 1b). Distinct from most structural studies of the apo SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in which multiple conformational states corresponding to 0–3 RBDs open were observed,[3-8] only one conformational state was observed in the structures of S in complex with each two-antibody cocktail (Fig. 1b), which also differed from the structural insights gained from the SARS-CoV-2 S in complex with FC05 or H014 or P17 alone. Furthermore, each of the two-antibody cocktail limits the conformational transitions of RBD, suggesting an additional benefit conferred during the cooperative neutralization carried out by the cocktail antibodies via interfering with viral membrane fusion. Functional assays have previously shown that obstruction of conformational transitions of S protein by NAbs, can activate or inhibit fusion of the coronavirus with the host cell membrane.[4,5,9] FC05 recognizes an extremely variable patch on the NTD; none of the bound residues are conserved between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, explaining the virus-specific binding and neutralization activities of FC05 (Fig. 1c). Contrarily, H014 targets a highly conserved epitope on the side of RBD and the epitope is only accessible when RBD is in the open state (Fig. 1c). Remarkably, FC05 and H014 adopt an interdigitated arrangement surrounding the exterior of the S trimer apex, which completely blocks the domain swapping between protomers and prevents the closure of RBD (Fig. 1b). It is worthy to note that the cocktail of FC05 and H014 represents a combination of two NAbs generated from two different approaches which confer potent neutralization activities against pan-SARS-CoVs. Interestingly, three HB27 Fabs bind at the top of each RBD, either in the open or closed state, forming a “cap” layer at the trimer apex close to the pseudo-threefold axis. This “cap” layer together with an exterior layer formed by three FC05 molecules, fully occlude the receptor binding site. The antibodies also prevent access to the proteolysis sites, cutting off the proteolytic activation of S by cell surface proteases (Fig. 1b, c). Surprisingly, P17 and FC05 exhibit a parallel binding mode to RBD and the adjacent NTD, forming a “two-Fab bundle” structure with contacts at the constant domains of these two Fabs (Fig. 1b–d). Structural characterization revealed that P17 and FC05 Fabs can mimic the two “arms” of a single IgG molecule, allowing us to rationally design a divalent antibody against SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1d). Footprint analysis of epitopes of these four NAbs suggests a partial overlap between H014 and HB27 epitopes, but no overlap between H014 and P17 or between HB27 and P17 epitopes (Fig. 1c). Superimposition of the structures of the complexes of S–HB27 and S–P17 shows steric clashes between HB27 and P17, suggesting that these two antibodies may not be able to bind the same RBD simultaneously (Fig. 1e). Theoretically it is plausible to develop a three-antibody cocktail consisting of FC05, H014 and P17 that simultaneously target three distinct regions[5] (Fig. 1e, f). To further investigate whether a fourth partner exists, available structures of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were aligned to our complex structures. Interestingly, S309, another cross-reactive NAb[10] against SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV has a potential to constitute the fourth component for our cocktails (Fig. 1g), conferring synergy in protective efficacy against pan-SARS-CoVs as well as robustness to viral mutation escape. In summary, we applied a rational NAb screening strategy to two different approaches of constructing antibody libraries, yielding potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies with high diversity. SPR-based cross-competition assays and cryo-EM analysis guided the development of next-generation human NAb cocktail, which can confer broad and effective protection against pan-SARS-CoVs.
  7 in total

1.  A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Chao Shan; Xiaomin Duan; Zhihai Chen; Peipei Liu; Jinwen Song; Tao Song; Xiaoshan Bi; Chao Han; Lianao Wu; Ge Gao; Xue Hu; Yanan Zhang; Zhou Tong; Weijin Huang; William Jun Liu; Guizhen Wu; Bo Zhang; Lan Wang; Jianxun Qi; Hui Feng; Fu-Sheng Wang; Qihui Wang; George Fu Gao; Zhiming Yuan; Jinghua Yan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody.

Authors:  Dora Pinto; Young-Jun Park; Martina Beltramello; Alexandra C Walls; M Alejandra Tortorici; Siro Bianchi; Stefano Jaconi; Katja Culap; Fabrizia Zatta; Anna De Marco; Alessia Peter; Barbara Guarino; Roberto Spreafico; Elisabetta Cameroni; James Brett Case; Rita E Chen; Colin Havenar-Daughton; Gyorgy Snell; Amalio Telenti; Herbert W Virgin; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Michael S Diamond; Katja Fink; David Veesler; Davide Corti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding.

Authors:  Miao Gui; Wenfei Song; Haixia Zhou; Jingwei Xu; Silian Chen; Ye Xiang; Xinquan Wang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Xiangyang Chi; Renhong Yan; Jun Zhang; Guanying Zhang; Yuanyuan Zhang; Meng Hao; Zhe Zhang; Pengfei Fan; Yunzhu Dong; Yilong Yang; Zhengshan Chen; Yingying Guo; Jinlong Zhang; Yaning Li; Xiaohong Song; Yi Chen; Lu Xia; Ling Fu; Lihua Hou; Junjie Xu; Changming Yu; Jianmin Li; Qiang Zhou; Wei Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Xiaoli Xiong; Young-Jun Park; M Alejandra Tortorici; Joost Snijder; Joel Quispe; Elisabetta Cameroni; Robin Gopal; Mian Dai; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Maria Zambon; Félix A Rey; Davide Corti; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 66.850

6.  Structural basis for neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV by a potent therapeutic antibody.

Authors:  Zhe Lv; Yong-Qiang Deng; Qing Ye; Lei Cao; Chun-Yun Sun; Changfa Fan; Weijin Huang; Shihui Sun; Yao Sun; Ling Zhu; Qi Chen; Nan Wang; Jianhui Nie; Zhen Cui; Dandan Zhu; Neil Shaw; Xiao-Feng Li; Qianqian Li; Liangzhi Xie; Youchun Wang; Zihe Rao; Cheng-Feng Qin; Xiangxi Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Qiang Gao; Linlin Bao; Haiyan Mao; Lin Wang; Kangwei Xu; Minnan Yang; Yajing Li; Ling Zhu; Nan Wang; Zhe Lv; Hong Gao; Xiaoqin Ge; Biao Kan; Yaling Hu; Jiangning Liu; Fang Cai; Deyu Jiang; Yanhui Yin; Chengfeng Qin; Jing Li; Xuejie Gong; Xiuyu Lou; Wen Shi; Dongdong Wu; Hengming Zhang; Lang Zhu; Wei Deng; Yurong Li; Jinxing Lu; Changgui Li; Xiangxi Wang; Weidong Yin; Yanjun Zhang; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  33 in total

Review 1.  Monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 therapy and SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Authors:  Yu-Chyi Hwang; Ruei-Min Lu; Shih-Chieh Su; Pao-Yin Chiang; Shih-Han Ko; Feng-Yi Ke; Kang-Hao Liang; Tzung-Yang Hsieh; Han-Chung Wu
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 8.410

2.  An engineered bispecific human monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Zhaohui Li; Shihua Li; Gen Zhang; Weiyu Peng; Zhen Chang; Xue Zhang; Zheng Fan; Yan Chai; Feiran Wang; Xin Zhao; Dedong Li; Rong Zhang; Zhanlong He; Weiwei Zou; Ke Xu; Wenwen Lei; Peipei Liu; Junfeng Hao; Jingjing Zhang; Litao Sun; Guizhen Wu; Shuguang Tan; George Fu Gao; Feng Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 31.250

3.  Humoral immune response to circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants elicited by inactivated and RBD-subunit vaccines.

Authors:  Yunlong Cao; Ayijiang Yisimayi; Yali Bai; Weijin Huang; Xiaofeng Li; Zhiying Zhang; Tianjiao Yuan; Ran An; Jing Wang; Tianhe Xiao; Shuo Du; Wenping Ma; Liyang Song; Yongzheng Li; Xiang Li; Weiliang Song; Jiajing Wu; Shuo Liu; Xuemei Li; Yonghong Zhang; Bin Su; Xianghua Guo; Yangyang Wei; Chuanping Gao; Nana Zhang; Yifei Zhang; Yang Dou; Xiaoyu Xu; Rui Shi; Bai Lu; Ronghua Jin; Yingmin Ma; Chengfeng Qin; Youchun Wang; Yingmei Feng; Junyu Xiao; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  Detailed analysis of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection in macaques.

Authors:  Alexandra C Willcox; Kevin Sung; Meghan E Garrett; Jared G Galloway; Jesse H Erasmus; Jennifer K Logue; David W Hawman; Helen Y Chu; Kim J Hasenkrug; Deborah H Fuller; Frederick A Matsen Iv; Julie Overbaugh
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 7.464

5.  Structural basis for bivalent binding and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection by human potent neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Renhong Yan; Ruoke Wang; Bin Ju; Jinfang Yu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Nan Liu; Jia Wang; Qi Zhang; Peng Chen; Bing Zhou; Yaning Li; Yaping Shen; Shuyuan Zhang; Long Tian; Yingying Guo; Lu Xia; Xinyue Zhong; Lin Cheng; Xiangyang Ge; Juanjuan Zhao; Hong-Wei Wang; Xinquan Wang; Zheng Zhang; Linqi Zhang; Qiang Zhou
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 46.297

6.  Structure-based development of three- and four-antibody cocktails against SARS-CoV-2 via multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  Yao Sun; Lei Wang; Rui Feng; Nan Wang; Yuxi Wang; Dandan Zhu; Xiaorui Xing; Peng Yang; Yanjun Zhang; Weimin Li; Xiangxi Wang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 46.297

7.  SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like pathological damages and constitutes an antiviral target.

Authors:  Bingqing Xia; Xurui Shen; Yang He; Xiaoyan Pan; Feng-Liang Liu; Yi Wang; Feipu Yang; Sui Fang; Yan Wu; Zilei Duan; Xiaoli Zuo; Zhuqing Xie; Xiangrui Jiang; Ling Xu; Hao Chi; Shuangqu Li; Qian Meng; Hu Zhou; Yubo Zhou; Xi Cheng; Xiaoming Xin; Lin Jin; Hai-Lin Zhang; Dan-Dan Yu; Ming-Hua Li; Xiao-Li Feng; Jiekai Chen; Hualiang Jiang; Gengfu Xiao; Yong-Tang Zheng; Lei-Ke Zhang; Jingshan Shen; Jia Li; Zhaobing Gao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 46.297

8.  Analysis of the molecular mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Authors:  Dongfu Jin; Jing Wei; Jian Sun
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Identification of Human SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies from Convalescent Patients Using EBV Immortalization.

Authors:  Rut Valgardsdottir; Irene Cattaneo; Gavino Napolitano; Annibale Raglio; Orietta Spinelli; Silvia Salmoiraghi; Concetta Castilletti; Daniele Lapa; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Claudio Farina; Josee Golay
Journal:  Antibodies (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Characterization of a Novel SARS-CoV-2 Genetic Variant with Distinct Spike Protein Mutations.

Authors:  Anna Gladkikh; Anna Dolgova; Vladimir Dedkov; Valeriya Sbarzaglia; Olga Kanaeva; Anna Popova; Areg Totolian
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.