| Literature DB >> 33262382 |
John P Dunbar1, Neyaz A Khan2, Cathy L Abberton3, Pearce Brosnan3, Jennifer Murphy3, Sam Afoullouss4, Vincent O'Flaherty2,3, Michel M Dugon5, Aoife Boyd2.
Abstract
The false widow spider Steatoda nobilis is associated with bites which develop bacterial infections that are sometimes unresponsive to antibiotics. These could be secondary infections derived from opportunistic bacteria on the skin or infections directly vectored by the spider. In this study, we investigated whether it is plausible for S. nobilis and other synanthropic European spiders to vector bacteria during a bite, by seeking to identify bacteria with pathogenic potential on the spiders. 11 genera of bacteria were identified through 16S rRNA sequencing from the body surfaces and chelicerae of S. nobilis, and two native spiders: Amaurobius similis and Eratigena atrica. Out of 22 bacterial species isolated from S. nobilis, 12 were related to human pathogenicity among which Staphylococcus epidermidis, Kluyvera intermedia, Rothia mucilaginosa and Pseudomonas putida are recognized as class 2 pathogens. The isolates varied in their antibiotic susceptibility: Pseudomonas putida, Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus edaphicus showed the highest extent of resistance, to three antibiotics in total. On the other hand, all bacteria recovered from S. nobilis were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Our study demonstrates that S. nobilis does carry opportunistic pathogenic bacteria on its body surfaces and chelicerae. Therefore, some post-bite infections could be the result of vector-borne bacterial zoonoses that may be antibiotic resistant.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33262382 PMCID: PMC7708416 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77839-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Bacteria genera identified on chelicerae of A. similis, E. atrica and S. nobilis.
| Spider Speciesa | Bacterial Genus | Occurrenceb |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 7 |
a34 chelicerae were tested from 3 spider species: A. similis—16; E. atrica—10; S. nobilis—8.
bNumber of times the genus was isolated from a spider species.
Figure 1Comparison of the bacterial community composition and relative abundances from body and chelicerae surfaces of A. similis, E. atrica and S. nobilis. Photographs of the spider species are shown to scale. Data of chelicerae isolates are displayed for A. similis and E. atrica, and combined data of both chelicerae and body isolates are displayed for S. nobilis. The tables display the number of times isolates of each bacterial genus was isolated from a spider species. The pie chart displays the relative abundance of the bacteria genera isolated.
Bacteria isolated from S. nobilis.
| Bacterial species | Sourcea | Growth on baird parker | Haemolytic | Pathogenicb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | − | − | − | |
| C | − | − | − | |
| C | − | − | + | |
| C | + | − | + | |
| C | − | − | + | |
| FB | + | + | − | |
| FB | + | + | − | |
| FB | + | − | + | |
| FB | + | − | − | |
| FB | + | + | − | |
| FB | + | − | + | |
| FB | − | − | − | |
| FB-D | + | + | + | |
| FB-D | + | − | + | |
| FB-D | − | + | − | |
| FB-D | − | − | − | |
| FB-D | − | − | + | |
| FB-D | + | − | − | |
| FB-D | + | − | − | |
| FB-D | + | − | − | |
| FB-D | + | − | + | |
| FB-D | + | − | − | |
| FB-D | + | − | + | |
| SW | − | − | + | |
| SW | + | − | + |
a37 samples tested from S. nobilis- 20 chelicerae, 15 full body (5 euthanised) and 2 spiders walk. C chelicerae; FB full body; D dead; SW spider walk.
bPathogenicity was defined based on bacterial metadatabase BacDive (https://bacdive.dsmz.de/). “+” indicates bacterial species is associated with opportunistic infections due to underlying acute or chronic health conditions. “−” indicates no known association of bacterial species with infection.
c(1) & (2) indicate different strains of same species based on differing antibiotic susceptibility (Table 3).
d98% sequence identity to S. anginosus.
e98% sequence identity to B. pumilis.
Antibiotic susceptibility of 25 bacterial isolates from S. nobilis.
Values shown are the average of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. SD for each value is ≤ 2 mm.
aAntibiotic abbreviations and classes: CIP ciprofloxacin (flouroquinolone), CN Gentamicin (aminoglycoside), AML amoxycillin (penicillin), E erythromycin (macrolide), C chloramphenicol, TE tetracycline, FOX cefoxitin (cephalosporin), NAL nalidixic acid (flouroquinolone), CT colistin (polymyxin).
bAmount of antibiotic in disk.
cBold bordered boxes indicate resistance.
d-; no zone of clearance.
eBolded species listed in CLSI guidelines.
Blue digits indicate susceptibility and red digits indicate resistance, according to CLSI guidelines; Black digits indicate antibiotic not recommended/applicable for respective species in CLSI guidelines.
Figure 2Antibiotic resistance profile of the bacterial community isolated from body and chelicerae of S. nobilis. (A) Number of bacterial isolates resistant to each antibiotic. (B) Number of isolates showing resistance to 0, 1, 2 and 3 different antibiotics.