| Literature DB >> 33262239 |
N Penney1, W Barton2,3,4, O O'Sullivan5,3, I Garcia-Perez6, J M Posma7,8, A Darzi1, G Frost9, P D Cotter2,3, E Holmes9, F Shanahan2,4.
Abstract
We investigated the individual and combined effects of diet and physical exercise on metabolism and the gut microbiome to establish how these lifestyle factors influence host-microbiome cometabolism. Urinary and fecal samples were collected from athletes and less active controls. Individuals were further classified according to an objective dietary assessment score of adherence to healthy dietary habits according to WHO guidelines, calculated from their proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) urinary profiles. Subsequent models were generated comparing extremes of dietary habits, exercise, and the combined effect of both. Differences in metabolic phenotypes and gut microbiome profiles between the two groups were assessed. Each of the models pertaining to diet healthiness, physical exercise, or a combination of both displayed a metabolic and functional microbial signature, with a significant proportion of the metabolites identified as discriminating between the various pairwise comparisons resulting from gut microbe-host cometabolism. Microbial diversity was associated with a combination of high adherence to healthy dietary habits and exercise and was correlated with a distinct array of microbially derived metabolites, including markers of proteolytic activity. Improved control of dietary confounders, through the use of an objective dietary assessment score, has uncovered further insights into the complex, multifactorial relationship between diet, exercise, the gut microbiome, and metabolism. Furthermore, the observation of higher proteolytic activity associated with higher microbial diversity indicates that increased microbial diversity may confer deleterious as well as beneficial effects on the host.IMPORTANCE Improved control of dietary confounders, through the use of an objective dietary assessment score, has uncovered further insights into the complex, multifactorial relationship between diet, exercise, the gut microbiome, and metabolism. Each of the models pertaining to diet healthiness, physical exercise, or a combination of both, displayed a distinct metabolic and functional microbial signature. A significant proportion of the metabolites identified as discriminating between the various pairwise comparisons result from gut microbe-host cometabolism, and the identified interactions have expanded current knowledge in this area. Furthermore, although increased microbial diversity has previously been linked with health, our observation of higher microbial diversity being associated with increased proteolytic activity indicates that it may confer deleterious as well as beneficial effects on the host.Entities:
Keywords: diet; exercise; metabolism; microbiome
Year: 2020 PMID: 33262239 PMCID: PMC7716389 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00677-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Clustering of individuals according to exercise status and adherence to healthy eating guidelines. Predicted adherence to WHO healthy eating guidelines calculated from 1H-NMR urinary profile of each individual using a validated metabolic profiling tool (see Materials and Methods for dietary assessment methodology). Individuals were subsequently clustered to form comparative models. Model 1 (healthy diet effect): comparing controls with a <35% adherence versus controls with a ≥100% adherence to WHO healthy eating guidelines. Model 2 (effect of exercise): controls with a ≥100% adherence versus professional athletes with a ≥100% adherence to WHO healthy eating guidelines. Model 3 (combined diet and exercise effect): controls with a <35% adherence versus athletes with a ≥100% adherence to WHO healthy eating guidelines.
FIG 21H-NMR metabolic phenotyping, SCFA, and microbial diversity results. (A to F) Cross-validated OPLS-DA score plots, generated with one predictive (Tcv) and one orthogonal (Tocv) component, of 1H-NMR urinary profiles comparing (A) controls with a <35% adherence (red) to controls with a ≥100% adherence (light blue) to WHO healthy eating guidelines (model 1, healthy diet effect), (B) controls with a ≥100% adherence to healthy eating (light blue) to professional athletes with a ≥100% adherence to healthy eating (dark blue) (model 2, exercise effect), (C) controls with a <35% adherence to healthy eating (red) versus professional athletes with a ≥100% adherence to healthy eating (dark blue) (model 3, combined effect), and 1H-NMR fecal profiles comparing (D) model 1, healthy diet effect, (E) model 2, exercise effect, and (F) model 3, combined effect. (G to I) Bar charts of mean SCFA levels measured through quantitative GC-MS comparing (G) model 1, healthy diet effect, (H) model 2, exercise effect, and (I) model 3, combined effect. (J to L) Box plots showing mean Shannon diversity index levels of taxa described by 16S profiling comparing (J) model 1, healthy diet effect, (K) model 2, exercise effect, and (L) model 3, combined effect. The 95% confidence intervals shown. Significant results (pFDR, <0.05) are marked with *.
FIG 3Fecal-urinary metabolic interactions. Significant Spearman correlations (pFDR, <0.05) between fecal and urinary metabolic data sets are shown, shaded according to the strength of the correlation coefficient (Rho). Correlations are clustered according to Euclidean distances.
FIG 4Microbial metabolic pathway-metabolite interactions. Significant Spearman correlations (pFDR, <0.01) between microbial metabolic pathways versus fecal and urinary metabolic data sets are shown, shaded according to the strength of the correlation coefficient (Rho). Correlations are clustered according to Euclidean distances.