Literature DB >> 33262010

Benefits of collaborative patient care rounds in the intensive care unit.

Leah B Chapman1, Kathleen E Kopp2, Michael G Petty3, Jodi L A Hartwig3, Kathryn M Pendleton4, Kimberly Langer5, Sonia J Meiers5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving care of critically ill patients requires using an interprofessional care model and care standardisation.
OBJECTIVES: Determine whether collaborative patient care rounds in the intensive care unit increases practice consistency with respect to common considerations such as delirium prevention, device use, and indicated prophylaxis, among others. Secondary objective to assess whether collaborative interprofessional format improved nursing perceptions of collaboration.
METHODS: Single centre, pre- and post- intervention design. collaborative patient care rounding format implemented in three intensive care units in an academic tertiary care centre. format consisted of scripted nursing presentation, provider checklist of additional practice considerations, and daily priority goals documentation. measurements included nursing participation, consideration of selected practice items, daily goal verbalisation, and nursing perception of collaboration.
RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention measurements indicate gains in consideration of eight of thirteen bundle items (p < 0.05), with the greatest gains seen in nurse-presented items. Increases were observed in verbalisation of daily goals (59.8% versus 89.1%, p < 0.0001), nurse participation (83.9% versus 91.8%, p = 0.056), and nurse collaboration ratings (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This study describes implementation of collaborative patient care rounds with corresponding increases in consideration of selected practice items, verbalisation of daily goals, and perceptions of collaboration.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklist; Collaboration; Communication; Goals; Intensive care units; Interdisciplinary care; Patient care methods

Year:  2020        PMID: 33262010     DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


  3 in total

Review 1.  Reducing Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) by Reducing Central Line Days.

Authors:  Amber Shaye McElveen Beville; Diane Heipel; Ginger Vanhoozer; Pamela Bailey
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Evaluation of Indicators of a Vascular Access Device Program led by Nursing Professionals in a High-complexity University Hospital in Colombia.

Authors:  Olga L Cortés; Yeris M Parra; Daniela A Torres; Patricia Monroy; Jannette C Malpica; Elena P Pérez; Carolina Mojica
Journal:  Invest Educ Enferm       Date:  2022-03

3.  Conducting a good ward round: How do leaders do it?

Authors:  Clair Merriman; Della Freeth
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.336

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.