| Literature DB >> 33261574 |
Jing Xu1, Liang Wang1, Yunli Shen1, Liang Geng1, Fadong Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) complicated by Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) remains to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Giving increasing evidences of benefit from targeted therapies, ES patients once thought to be inoperable may have increasing options for management. This study aims to explore whether PDA in patients with ES can be treated with transcatheter closure (TCC).Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic treatment and repair strategy; Eisenmenger syndrome; Patent ductus arteriosus; Targeted drugs; Transcatheter closure
Year: 2020 PMID: 33261574 PMCID: PMC7709273 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01795-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig.1Study flow chart. PDA patent ductus arteriosus, ES Eisenmenger syndrome, Qp/Qs pulmonary-systemic blood flow ratio, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, TCC transcatheter closure
Baseline demographic characteristics and echocardiography parameters of all patients
| Patient (no.) | Sex | Age (years) | WHO FC | 6MWD (m) | LVEF (%) | RV diameter (mm) | PASP (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 29 | III | 440 | 53 | 69 * 42 | 115 |
| 2 | F | 19 | II | 400 | 67 | 57 * 29 | 120 |
| 3 | F | 32 | II–III | 170 | 72 | 68 * 40 | 144 |
| 4 | F | 34 | III | 450 | 67 | 75 * 35 | 104 |
WHO FC WHO functional class, 6MWD six-minute walking distances, PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, RV right ventricle
Baseline hemodynamics parameters measured by right heart catheterization
| Patient (no.) | PDA-SD | RAP (mm Hg) | PA | AO (mm Hg) | TPR (Wood U) | PVR (Wood U) | SVR (Wood U) | PVR/SVR | SaO2 (%) | Qp/Qs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | DP | MP | SP | DP | MP | Baseline | O2 test | ||||||||
| 1 | Bidi | 13/6/9 | 105 | 73 | 81 | 114 | 69 | 79 | 18.95 | 16.14 | 28.29 | 0.57 | 91.8 | 1.73 | 2.92 |
| 2 | Bidi | 5/0/2 | 105 | 65 | 85 | 115 | 65 | 80 | 15.82 | 14.70 | 40.34 | 0.36 | 95 | 2.13 | 2.46 |
| 3 | Bidi | 9/2/5 | 143 | 63 | 95 | 142 | 62 | 95 | 40.31 | 36.91 | 36.07 | 1.02 | 88.9 | 1.00 | 1.72 |
| 4 | Bidi | 11/3/7 | 134 | 72 | 98 | 130 | 70 | 90 | 23.13 | 21.01 | 24.50 | 0.86 | 89.7 | 1.10 | 2.60 |
PDA-SD shunt direction across PDA, Bidi Bi-directional shunt; RAP, right atrium pressure, PA pulmonary artery, AO aortic pressure, SP systolic pressure, DP diastolic pressure, MP mean pressure, TPR total pulmonary resistance, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, Qp/Qs pulmonary-systemic blood flow ratio, SVR systemic vascular resistance, SaO systemic arterial oxygen saturation
Initial and adjusted PAH-targeted drugs before TCC
| Paitent (no.) | Intial | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vardenafil 5 mg bid | Vardenafil 5 mg bid Bosentan 125 mg bid |
| 2 | Tadanafil 20 mg qd | Tadalafil 20 mg qd Bosentan 125 mg bid |
| 3 | Bosentan 125 mg bid Tadanafil 20 mg qd | Bosentan 125 mg bid Tadanafil 20 mg qd |
| 4 | Ambrisentan 5 mg qd Tadalafil 20 mg qd | Ambrisentan 5 mg qd Tadalafil 20 mg qd |
Comparisons between pre- and post-occlusion parameters
| Patient (no.) | PDA diameter (mm) | Occluder size (mm) | PA (mmHg) | AO (mmHg) | SaO2 (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- | Post- | Pre- | Post- | pre- | post- | |||||||||||
| SP | DP | MP | SP | DP | MP | SP | DP | MP | SP | DP | MP | |||||
| 1 | 10 | 18–20 | 105 | 54 | 72 | 56 | 34 | 43 | 113 | 73 | 85 | 124 | 86 | 108 | 96 | 98 |
| 2 | 9 | 16–18 | 110 | 61 | 84 | 61 | 44 | 53 | 123 | 69 | 94 | 116 | 69 | 91 | 97 | 100 |
| 3 | 9 | 20–22 | 138 | 58 | 88 | 74 | 27 | 46 | 137 | 67 | 89 | 150 | 70 | 100 | 92 | 100 |
| 4 | 11 | 20–22 | 145 | 72 | 104 | 72 | 30 | 48 | 144 | 78 | 102 | 153 | 91 | 116 | 97 | 100 |
PDA patent ductus arteriosus, PA pulmonary artery, AO aorta, SP systolic pressure, DP diastolic pressure, MP mean pressure, SaO systemic arterial oxygen saturation
Fig.2PASP changes on echocardiography and adjustment of targeted drugs at follow-up after final TCC. PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, TCC transcatheter closure
Hemodynamics parameters measured by right heart catheterization at follow-up
| Paitent (no.) | RAP (mmHg) | PASP (mmHg) | CO (L/min) | SaO2 (%) | PVR (Wood U) | SVR (Wood U) | PVR/SVR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 11/6/9 | 55/18/36 | 6.0 | 98 | 3.83 | 13.33 | 0.29 |
| 3 | 15/8/11 | 139/47/82 | 5.6 | 94.3 | 12.68 | 14.29 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 12/1/6 | 136/54/86 | 5.9 | 92.2 | 12.54 | 15.67 | 0.80 |
RAP right atrium pressure, PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, CO cardiac output, SaO systemic arterial oxygen saturation, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, SVR systemic vascular resistance
RV diameter, WHO FC,6MWD and PAH-targeted drugs at the last follow-up
| Paitent (no.) | RV diameter (mm) | WHO FC | 6MWD (m) | PAH-targeted drugs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 * 25 | I | 550 | – |
| 2 | 55 * 28 | I | 500 | Ambrisentan |
| 3 | 65 * 40 | II | 440 | Bosentan, tadalafil |
| 4 | 59 * 39 | II | 490 | Macitentan,tadalafil |
RV right ventricle, WHO FC WHO functional class, 6MWD six-minute walking distances