| Literature DB >> 33260859 |
Luisa Bataglin Avila1, Elis Regina Correa Barreto2, Paloma Krolow de Souza2, Bárbara De Zorzi Silva2, Thamiris Renata Martiny1,3, Caroline Costa Moraes4, Marcilio Machado Morais2, Vijaya Raghavan5, Gabriela Silveira da Rosa1,2,4.
Abstract
This research investigated the bioactive potential of jaboticaba peel extract (JPE) and proposed an innovative material for food packaging based on carrageenan films incorporated with JPE. The extract was obtained through microwave assisted extraction (MAE) according to central composite rotational design and the optimized conditions showed a combined antimicrobial and antioxidant actions when the extraction process is accomplished at 80 °C and 1 min. The carrageenan film incorporated with JPE was manageable, homogeneous and the presence of JPE into film increased the thickness and improved the light barrier of the film. The results of solubility and mechanical properties did not show significant differences. The benefit of using MAE to improve the recovery of bioactive compounds was demonstrated and the carrageenan film with JPE showed a great strategy to add additives into food packaging.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; bioactive compounds; carrageenan film; jaboticaba peel; microwave-assisted extraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33260859 PMCID: PMC7730467 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolic content (TP), antioxidant activity (AA), total anthocyanin (TA), and cyanidin 3-glucoside (C-3-G) of the extracts obtained from jaboticaba peels.
| x (°C) | y (min) | TP (mgGAE·g−1) (d.b.) | AA (%) | TA (mg·100g−1) (d.b.) | C-3-G (mgcyan·g−1) (d.b.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1(60) | –1(2) | 283.52 ± 12.22 | 94.5 ± 0.05 | 238.66 ± 5.86 | 435.91 ± 1.16 |
| 2 | −1(60) | 1(6) | 319.82 ± 2.43 | 93.9 ± 0 | 141.79 ± 4.16 | 656.97 ± 0.93 |
| 3 | 1(100) | –1(2) | 347.84 ± 3.76 | 92.8 ± 0.9 | 164.11 ± 2.23 | 526.41 ± 0.44 |
| 4 | 1(100) | 1(6) | 346.08 ± 4.23 | 92.4 ± 0.8 | 126.41 ± 4.53 | 302.41 ± 0.35 |
| 5 | −1.41(52) | 0(4) | 230.06 ± 0.44 | 94.9 ± 0.02 | 62.66 ± 1.41 | 369.01 ± 0.16 |
| 6 | 1.41(108) | 0(4) | 356.93 ± 2.48 | 94.8 ± 0.1 | 80.55 ± 2.16 | 80.75 ± 0.03 |
| 7 | 0(80) | −1.41(1) | 348.92 ± 1.75 | 92.6 ± 0.6 | 208.33 ± 7.04 | 686.05 ± 0.22 |
| 8 | 0(80) | 1.41(7) | 357.26 ± 0.60 | 90.9 ± 0.6 | 203.25 ± 1.66 | 646.89 ± 0.60 |
| 9 | 0(80) | 0(4) | 347.58 ± 2.57 | 92.4 ± 0.2 | 154.54 ± 2.63 | 683.69 ± 12.74 |
| 10 | 0(80) | 0(4) | 357.65 ± 2.12 | 95.4 ± 0.2 | 157.69 ± 2.91 | 554.30 ± 5.48 |
| 11 | 0(80) | 0(4) | 360.12 ± 6.71 | 93.6 ± 0.4 | 173.49 ± 4.68 | 736.82 ± 5.56 |
Data reported are average of 3 replicates and ± mean deviation.
Figure 1Pareto diagram of the estimated effects on TP (a), AA (b), TA (c), and C-3-G (d).
ANOVA for TP, TA, and C-3-G from jaboticaba peels.
| Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Fvalue | Ftabled | R2 | R2 Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | ||||||
| Regression | 15,433.02 | 1 | 13.51 | 161.44 | 0.93 | 0.99 |
| Residual | 1141.63 | 1 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 1053.34 | 3 | 7.95 | 19.16 | ||
| Pure error | 88.29 | 2 | ||||
| Total | 16,574.65 | 10 | ||||
| TA | ||||||
| Regression | 22,078.16 | 3 | 3.95 | 9.27 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| Residual | 5581.62 | 3 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 5375.34 | 3 | 17.37 | 19.16 | ||
| Pure error | 206.28 | 2 | ||||
| Total | 27,659.78 | 10 | ||||
| C-3-G | ||||||
| Regression | 451,997.1 | 1 | 55.11 | 161.44 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Residual | 8201.3 | 1 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 5336.1 | 3 | 1.24 | 19.16 | ||
| Pure error | 2865.2 | 2 | ||||
| Total | 460,198.4 | 10 |
Figure 2Desirability function for the optimizing conditions for the extraction of bioactive compounds from jaboticaba peels.
Optimized conditions for the extraction of TP, TA, and C-3-G using MAE, corresponding to the predicted and observed yields.
| Exp Conditions | TP, Pred Response (mgGAE·g−1) (d.b.) | TP (mgGAE·g−1) (d.b.) | TA, Pred Response (mg·100g−1) (d.b.) | TA (mg·100g−1) (d.b.) | C-3-G, Pred Response (mgcyan·g−1) (d.b.) | C-3-G (mgcyan·g−1) (d.b.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 °C, 1 min | 345.41 | 383.81 ± 7.41 | 245.38 | 207.96 ± 7.82 | 694.15 | 789.25 ± 3.02 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra of the jaboticaba peel powder and extract.
Figure 4Biodegradable carrageenan films appearance: (a) CAR-control and (b) CAR-JPE.
Thickness, solubility, mechanical properties, and optical properties of films.
| Film | Thickness (mm) | Solubility (%) | Elongation at Break (%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR–control | 0.032 a ± 0.0048 | 79.02 a ± 4.76 | 21.30 a ± 3.58 | 10.69 a ± 1.61 |
| CAR–JPE | 0.054 b ± 0.0055 | 82.84 a ± 10.57 | 28.26 a ± 3.69 | 6.08 a ± 0.33 |
|
| ||||
| Film |
Δ | |||
| CAR–control | 94.49 a ± 0.21 | −0.145 a ± 0.03 | 3.32 a ± 0.30 | - |
| CAR–JPE | 19.96 b ± 1.08 | 52.77 b ± 1.10 | 34.26 b ± 1.86 | 96.50 |
Data reported are the average values and ± mean deviation. Note: Different letters in the exponent (a and b) represent significant differences (p < 0.05) between the mean obtained by the Tukey test. CAR-control = carrageenan biodegradable film; and CAR-JPE = carrageenan biodegradable film with jaboticaba peel extract. L* = lightness/brightness; a* = redness/greenness; b* = yellowness/blueness; and ΔE = total color difference.
Independent variables of the experimental design and the extraction conditions.
|
|
| ||||
| −1.41 | −1 | 0 | +1 | +1.41 | |
| Temperature (°C) | 51.8 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 108.2 |
| Time (min) | 1.18 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6.82 |