| Literature DB >> 33260840 |
Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz1, Saiful Amri Mazlan1,2, U Ubaidillah3,4, Norzilawati Mohamad5, Seung-Bok Choi6, Mohamad Amirul Che Aziz1, Mohd Aidy Faizal Johari1, Koji Homma2.
Abstract
Engineering rubber composites have been widely used as main components in many fields including vehicle engineering and biomedical applications. However, when a rubber composite surface area is exposed to heat or sunlight and over a long-term accelerated exposure and lifecycle of test, the rubber becomes hard, thus influencing the mechanical and rheological behavior of the materials. Therefore, in this study, the deterioration of rheological characteristics particularly the phase shift angle (δ) of silicone rubber (SR) based magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) is investigated under the effect of thermal aging. SR-MRE with 60 wt% of CIPs is fabricated and subjected to a continuous temperature of 100 °C for 72 h. The characterization of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging related to hardness, micrograph, and rheological properties are characterized using low vacuum scanning electron microscopy (LV-SEM) and a rheometer, respectively. The results demonstrated that the morphological analysis has a rough surface and more voids occurred after the thermal aging. The hardness and the weight of the SR-MRE before and after thermal aging were slightly different. Nonetheless, the thermo-rheological results showed that the stress-strain behavior have changed the phase-shift angle (δ) of SR-MRE particularly at a high strain. Moreover, the complex mechanism of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging can be observed through the changes of the 'in-rubber structure' under rheological properties. Finally, the relationship between the phase-shift angle (δ) and the in-rubber structure due to thermal aging are discussed thoroughly which led to a better understanding of the thermo-rheological behavior of SR-MRE.Entities:
Keywords: Payne effect; magnetorheological elastomer; phase shift angle; rheological properties; thermal aging; thermo-rheological
Year: 2020 PMID: 33260840 PMCID: PMC7730277 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Sample of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging of 100 °C for 72 h.
| Sample | Before Thermal Aging (g) | After Thermal Aging (g) | Weight Loss Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| SR-MRE (1) | 1.0897 | 1.0767 | 1.19% |
| SR-MRE (2) | 1.0911 | 1.0784 | 1.16% |
An average of hardness of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging by using Durometer (shore-A) hardness tester.
| Sample | Before Thermal Aging | After Thermal Aging | Hardness Depletion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| SR-MRE (1) | 59.7 | 1.6 | 55.4 | 1.8 | 7.2% |
| SR-MRE (2) | 57.6 | 3.1 | 53.4 | 2.9 | 7.3% |
Figure 1Cross-section of SR-MRE (a) before thermal aging and (b) after thermal aging.
Figure 2Micrograph analysis of SR-MRE (a) before and (b) after thermal aging.
Figure 3Storage modulus of SR-MRE (a) before and (b) after thermal aging.
Figure 4Comparison of storage modulus of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging at off- and on-state condition.
Figure 5Loss modulus vs strain (a) before thermal aging and (b) after thermal aging.
Summary of loss modulus before and after thermal aging at different magnetic field.
| Magnetic Field | Minimum Loss Modulus (MPa) | Maximum Loss Modulus (MPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Aging | After Aging | Before Aging | After Aging | |
| 0T | 0.021 | 0.023 | 0.059 | 0.071 |
| 0.19T | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.066 | 0.080 |
| 0.39T | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.071 | 0.103 |
| 0.58T | 0.028 | 0.031 | 0.081 | 0.116 |
| 0.73T | 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.094 | 0.121 |
| 0.85T | 0.032 | 0.033 | 0.111 | 0.119 |
Figure 6Phase shift angle (δ) at different strains and magnetic fields before and after thermal aging.
Figure 7Comparison of matrix-particle interaction before thermal aging at (a) LVE; (b) low strain and (c) high strain regions.
Figure 8Comparison of (a) initial freedom; (b) extended freedom and (c) extended of freedom according to magnetic field of SR-MRE.
Figure 9Comparison of loss factor of SR-MRE before and after thermal aging.
Figure 10SR-MRE sample preparation.