| Literature DB >> 33260465 |
Simonas Ramanavicius1,2, Arunas Ramanavicius2.
Abstract
In this review article, attention is paid towards the formation of various nanostructured stoichiometric titanium dioxide (TiO2), non-stoichiometric titanium oxide (TiO2-x) and Magnéli phase (TinO2n-1)-based layers, which are suitable for the application in gas and volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors. Some aspects related to variation of sensitivity and selectivity of titanium oxide-based sensors are critically overviewed and discussed. The most promising titanium oxide-based hetero- and nano-structures are outlined. Recent research and many recently available reviews on TiO2-based sensors and some TiO2 synthesis methods are discussed. Some promising directions for the development of TiO2-based sensors, especially those that are capable to operate at relatively low temperatures, are outlined. The applicability of non-stoichiometric titanium oxides in the development of gas and VOC sensors is foreseen and transitions between various titanium oxide states are discussed. The presence of non-stoichiometric titanium oxide and Magnéli phase (TinO2n-1)-based layers in 'self-heating' sensors is predicted, and the advantages and limitations of 'self-heating' gas and VOC sensors, based on TiO2 and TiO2-x/TiO2 heterostructures, are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Magnéli phases (TinO2n−1); gas and volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors; nanomaterials; non-stoichiometric titanium oxide (TiOn or TiO2−x); titanium dioxide (TiO2)
Year: 2020 PMID: 33260465 PMCID: PMC7730008 DOI: 10.3390/s20236833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Variation of the crystal structure of titanium oxides with O/Ti stoichiometry. Adapted from [40].
| Compound | X in TiOx | Structure |
|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | 2 | Rutile |
| Ti10O19 | 1.9 | Anatase |
| Ti9O17 | 1.89 | Triclinic |
| Ti8O15 | 1.875 | Triclinic |
| Ti7O13 | 1.857 | Triclinic |
| Ti6O11 | 1.833 | Triclinic |
| Ti5O9 | 1.8 | Triclinic |
| Ti4O7 | 1.75 | Triclinic |
| γTi3O5 | 1.67 | Monoclinic |
| Ti2O3 | 1.5 | Tetragonal |
| TiO | 1 | Hexagonal |
| Cubic Monoclinic | ||
| Ti2O | 0.5 | Hexagonal |
| Ti | 0 | Hexagonal |
Figure 1Crystal structures of various titanium oxides. Adapted from [40].
Figure 2Band diagram of GO/TiO2 composite (a) before contact, (b) after contact, (c) during UV irradiation, and (d) after UV irradiation. (e: electron, h: hole), adapted from [51].
Figure 3Structural and band models of conductive mechanism upon exposure to CO gas. (A) in the absence of CO, (B) in the presence of CO.
Figure 4XRD patterns of: A—metallic Ti layer of 100 nm thickness, which was formed by magnetron sputtering; B—TiO2−x/TiO2(400 °C)-based heterostructure, which was formed from above mentioned metallic 100 nm thick Ti layer; C—TiO2-powder, which was used as ‘control sample’ and by supplier (Sigma-Aldrich) was declared as 99.3% TiO2 in anatase phase. Figure adapted from [1].