| Literature DB >> 33260430 |
Małgorzata Starowicz1, Ewa Lelujka2, Ewa Ciska1, Grzegorz Lamparski3, Tomasz Sawicki4, Małgorzata Wronkowska1.
Abstract
Aroma plays an important role in designing innovative functional foods. This study aimed to study the influence of incorporating herbs from the Lamiaceae family (sage, mint, rosemary, oregano, thyme) on aroma compound formation and sensory properties in oat-buckwheat products. DPPH, FRAP and PCL have been used to describe possible antioxidant activity changes and reduce power of cookies after Lamiaceae Lindl. addition. The volatiles analysis by HS-SPME-GC/MS, has shown that Lamiaceae addition significantly influences the volatiles composition (29 molecules) with a predominance of molecules with a positive sensorial impression. Cookies elaborated with herbs were characterized by a greater share of monoterpenes (e.g., limonene, eucalyptol), in the volatile profile than in control cookies. These compounds' occurrence was closely correlated with the appearance of herbal odor and taste among sensory attributes in cookies with herbs addition. In contrast, a decrease of negative oil aroma and the bitter aftertaste was noted by a sensory panel. Moreover, in cookies of mint and rosemary, hexanal share decreased about 13 and 9.7-times, respectively. Considering all presented experiments, rosemary addition was the most effective in forming a positive aroma profile with high sensory acceptance and increased functional properties.Entities:
Keywords: HS-SPME-GC/MS; Lamiaceae herbs; bakery products; functional properties; sensory analysis; volatiles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33260430 PMCID: PMC7729772 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Determination of volatile compounds in samples of cookies: C- control (without herbs) and 1- cookie with sage, 2- mint, 3- rosemary, 4- oregano, and 5- thyme.
| No. | Compound | Chemical Family | Aroma Description | LRIs exp. | LRIs lit. | C- control | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [%] of Total Peak Area | |||||||||||
| 1 | 1-hexanol | Alcohols | fresh, fruity | 888 | 863 | 3.65 ± 0.03 a | 1.84 ± 0.03 b | - | 1.32 ± 0.02 b | - | - |
| 2 | hexanal | Aldehydes | green, grassy | 1078 | 1098 | 38.26 ± 1.35 a | 18.58 ± 0.90 b | 2.93 ± 0.01 f | 3.94 ± 0.07 e | 12.64 ± 0.10 c | 8.20 ± 0.10 d |
| 3 | 2-heptanon | Ketones | banana-like | 1174 | 1187 | 6.71 ± 0.5 b | - | 2.93 ± 0.05 d | 3.94 ± 0.05 c | - | 8.07 ± 0.05 a |
| 4 | limonene | Monoterpenes | citrus | 1180 | 1188 | - | - | 2.78 ± 0.02 a | 1.93 ± 0.01 b | - | - |
| 5 | eucalyptol | Monoterpenes | herbal | 1205 | 1214 | - | - | 4.27 ± 0.01 b | 28.21 ± 0.14 a | 2.63 ± 0.02 c | - |
| 6 | 2-methylpyrazine | Pyrazines | nutty | 1236 | 1251 | 6.93 ± 0.02 d | 8.18 ± 0.70 b | 10.76 ± 0.09 a | 8.48 ± 0.04 b | 7.51 ± 0.05 c | - |
| 7 | cymene | Monoterpenes | terpenic | 1277 | 1281 | - | - | - | - | - | 22.33 ± 0.08 |
| 8 | 4-methylthiazole | Thiazoles | nutty | 1280 | 1279 | 3.97 ± 0.02 b | 2.38 ± 0.05 c | 3.43 ± 0.03 b | 2.85 ± 0.02 c | 1.97 ± 0.02 d | 4.79 ± 0.01 a |
| 9 | 2-heptanal | Aldehydes | pungent, green | 1319 | 1323 | - | - | 21.13 ± 0.22 | - | - | - |
| 10 | 2,5-dimethylpyrazine | Pyrazines | cocoa, roasted | 1323 | 1320 | 7.09 ± 0.08 b | 9.59 ± 0.12 a | - | 7.43 ± 0.05 b | 9.05 ± 0.09 a | - |
| 11 | 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-on | Ketones | citrus-like, fruity | 1375 | 1365 | 4.36 ± 0.01 c | - | 5.92 ± 0.08 b | 4.07 ± 0.01 c | - | 11.31 ± 0.15 a |
| 12 | thujone | Monoterpenes | thujonic, herbal | 1435 | 1438 | - | 1.70 ± 0.01 | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | nonanal | Aldehydes | aldehydic | 1440 | 1437 | 1.62 ± 0.01 b | - | 2.36 ± 0.02 a | - | - | - |
| 14 | furfural alcohol | Furans | almond, sweet | 1457 | 1458 | - | - | - | - | 2.52 ± 0.06 | - |
| 15 | acetic acid | Acids | sour, pungent | 1478 | 1477 | - | 3.88 ± 0.02 b | - | - | 6.26 ± 0.57 a | - |
| 16 | furfural | Furans | sweet, fruity | 1491 | 1485 | 1.80 ± 0.01 d | 2.32 ± 0.01 c | - | 2.28 ± 0.02 c | 7.66 ± 0.08 a | 3.07 ± 0.01 b |
| 17 | 2-ethylhexanol | Alcohols | fruity | 1500 | 1504 | 3.74 ± 0.04 b | 3.36 ± 0.08 b | 7.86 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.01 c | - | - |
| 18 | benzaldehyde | Aldehydes | burnt sugar | 1542 | 1525 | 8.57 ± 0.12 a | 6.21 ± 0.02 b | - | 4.36 ± 0.02 c | 4.04 ± 0.01 c | 9.61 ± 0.08 c |
| 19 | linalool | Alcohols | floral, lemon-like | 1550 | 1554 | - | - | - | 1.59 ± 0.01 | 2.17 ± 0.02 a | - |
| 20 | octan-1ol | Alcohols | herbal | 1563 | 1565 | - | - | 1.88 ± 0.01 | - | - | - |
| 21 | β-caryophyllene | Sesquiterpenoids | woody | 1627 | 1618 | - | - | 4.74 ± 0.05 | - | - | - |
| 22 | γ-butyrolactone | Lactones | sweet, caramel | 1639 | 1640 | 6.36 ± 0.13 c | 26.79 ± 0.15 a | 10.59 ± 0.08 b | 2.67 ± 0.03 d | 2.68 ± 0.02 d | 5.75 ± 0.01 c |
| 23 | menthol | Monoterpenes | fresh, herbal | 1622 | 1626 | - | 1.45 ± 0.01 b | - | 1.83 ± 0.01 a | - | 1.09 ± 0.02 c |
| 24 | salicylaldehyde | Aldehydes | pungent, spicy | 1668 | 1658 | - | 5.39 ± 0.05 c | 7.44 ± 0.02 a | 5.82 ± 0.05 c | 6.05 ± 0.02 b | - |
| 25 | terpineol | Monoterpenes | minty, anise | 1718 | 1719 | - | - | - | 4.22 ± 0.03 | - | - |
| 26 | borneol | Monoterpenes | camphor, musty | 1726 | 1721 | - | - | - | 4.85 ± 0.01 a | - | 3.28 ± 0.05 b |
| 27 | caproic acid | Carboxylic acid | pungent, rancid | 1866 | 1863 | 5.16 ± 0.02 b | 4.53 ± 0.04 c | 7.20 ± 0.05 a | 3.55 ± 0.02 c | 3.21 ± 0.08 d | 5.07 ± 0.08 b |
| 28 | thymol | Monoterpenes | herbal | 2155 | 2157 | - | 3.82 ± 0.03 a | - | 1.02 ± 0.01 b | - | - |
| 29 | carvacrol | Monoterpenes | caraway | 2180 | 2183 | 1.78 ± 0.01 d | - | 3.77 ± 0.02 c | 4.65 ± 0.05 c | 31.61 ± 0.02 a | 17.43 ± 0.15 b |
Values were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05), as determined by the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. “-” compound was not detected.
Determination of antioxidant activity in extracts of oat-buckwheat cookies by DPPH, FRAP and PCL method (lipid-soluble antioxidant compounds- ACL and water-soluble antioxidant compounds- ACW).
| DPPH | FRAP | PCL ACW | PCL ACL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-control | 0.09 ± 0.00 d | 1.33 ± 0.11 c | 3.34 ± 0.32 c | 10.55 ± 0.07 d |
| Cookies with: | ||||
| sage | 3.48 ± 0.20 b | 2.07 ± 0.04 b | 7.16 ± 0.66 b | 42.92 ± 2.70 a |
| mint | 4.23 ± 0.04 a | 2.47± 0.12 a | 9.32 ± 0.70 a | 15.99 ± 0.31 c |
| rosemary | 3.83 ± 0.34 ab | 2.67 ± 0.10 a | 6.36 ± 0.49 b | 18.71 ± 0.71 c |
| oregano | 1.90 ± 0.26 c | 2.18 ± 0.13 b | 6.47 ± 0.58 b | 23.95 ± 0.59 b |
| thyme | 0.16 ± 0.00 d | 2.16 ± 0.08 b | 5.79 ± 0.19 b | 7.08 ± 0.27 e |
Values were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05), as determined by the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Figure 1Spider diagram presenting the effect of herbs addition on QDA parameters (a) and overall quality of oat-buckwheat cookies (b). “*” in Figure 1a marked that results were statistically significant differences indicated by p ≤ 0.05. a, b- values marked with the same letter are not statistically significant in Figure 1b (Tukey test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2PLS correlation analysis of samples, between aroma compounds and sensory attributes. S1–S29 number of compounds identified in the analyzed samples of control, and cookies with herbs addition: sage, mint, rosemary, oregano, and thyme.
Figure 3Oat-buckwheat cookies (C- control, without herb addition) and with the fortification of herbs: 1- sage, 2- mint, 3- rosemary, 4- oregano, 5- thyme.
Sensory attributes, their definitions and scale edges used in the QDA of experimental cookies.
| Attributes | Definition | Scale Edges | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color | brown color | color intensity (color pattern RAL 050 50 30-scale value 5) | light–dark |
| Aroma | herbal | aroma note characteristic for herbs like: sage, mint, rosemary, oregano and thyme | non-intensive–very intensive |
| cookie | aroma typical for commercial muesli cookies | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| sweet | aroma note typical for sweet additives | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| oil | characteristic aroma of commercially- available oil e.g., sunflower oil | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| Taste | sweet | taste characteristic for saccharose solution | non-intensive–very intensive |
| cookie | taste typical for commercial muesli cookies | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| herbal | taste associated with added herbs e.g., sage, mint, rosemary, oregano, and thyme | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| aftertaste: bitter | impression of bitterness that persists after swallowing the sample | non-intensive–very intensive | |
| Texture | hardness | the force required to bite a sample placed between the front teeth | low–high |
| crispness | the force required to crush the specimen within five bites with the molars | low–high | |
| chewiness | chewing the sample multiple times in order to prepare it for ingestion | low–high | |
| adhesiveness | degree of adhesion felt after 10 chews | low–high | |
| overall acceptance | overall quality contain all attributes and their harmonization | low–high | |