Literature DB >> 33259231

Measurement properties of the Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth (PLAY) Tools.

Hilary A Caldwell1,2, Natascja A Di Cristofaro1, John Cairney3, Steven R Bray2, Brian W Timmons1,2.   

Abstract

The Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth (PLAY) Tools are a suite of tools to assess an individual's physical literacy. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the PLAY Tools, including inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, validity and the associations between the tools. In this study, 218 children and youth (aged 8.4 to 13.7 years) and a parent/guardian completed the appropriate physical literacy assessments (i.e., PLAYbasic, PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself) and the Bruiniks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2). Inter-rater reliability for PLAYfun was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). The PLAYbasic, PLAYfun total, running and object control scores, and PLAYparent motor competence domain were higher in males than females, and PLAYfun locomotor skills were lower in males than females (p < 0.05). Age was positively correlated with PLAYbasic and PLAYfun (r = 0.14-0.32, p < 0.05). BOT-2 was positively correlated with PLAYfun and PLAYbasic (r = 0.19-0.59, p < 0.05). PLAYbasic is a significant predictor of PLAYfun (r2 = 0.742, p < 0.001). PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself were moderately correlated with one another. PLAYfun, PLAYparent and PLAYself demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74-0.87, ω = 0.73-0.87). The PLAY Tools demonstrated moderate associations between one another, strong inter-rater reliability and good construct and convergent validity. Continued evaluation of these tools with other populations, such as adolescents, is necessary. Novelty: In school-age children, the PLAY Tools demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability, moderate associations with one another, acceptable internal consistency and good construct and convergent validity. The results suggest that that PLAY Tools are an acceptable method of evaluation for physical literacy in school-age children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; enfants; fiabilité; jeunes; measurement; mesure; reliability; validity; validité; youth

Year:  2020        PMID: 33259231     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  7 in total

1.  Adolescents with Higher Cognitive and Affective Domains of Physical Literacy Possess Better Physical Fitness: The Importance of Developing the Concept of Physical Literacy in High Schools.

Authors:  Barbara Gilic; Pavle Malovic; Mirela Sunda; Nevenka Maras; Natasa Zenic
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Out-of-School Sports Participation Is Positively Associated with Physical Literacy, but What about Physical Education? A Cross-Sectional Gender-Stratified Analysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic among High-School Adolescents.

Authors:  Mirela Sunda; Barbara Gilic; Damir Sekulic; Radenko Matic; Patrik Drid; Dan Iulian Alexe; Gheorghe Gabriel Cucui; Gabriel Stanica Lupu
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Validation of a Speech Database for Assessing College Students' Physical Competence under the Concept of Physical Literacy.

Authors:  Rui-Si Ma; Si-Ioi Ng; Tan Lee; Yi-Jian Yang; Raymond Kim-Wai Sum
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  The Impact of an After-School Physical Activity Program on Children's Physical Activity and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Hilary A T Caldwell; Matthew B Miller; Constance Tweedie; Jeffery B L Zahavich; Ella Cockett; Laurene Rehman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Physical Activity and Nutrition Intervention for Middle Schoolers (Move More, Get More): Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Amanda Grimes; Joseph S Lightner; Katlyn Eighmy; Bridget D Wray; Ella Valleroy; Maya Baughn
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-05-04

6.  Results from the Thailand 2022 report card on physical activity for children and youth.

Authors:  Dyah Anantalia Widyastari; Pairoj Saonuam; Kornkanok Pongpradit; Narakorn Wongsingha; Panya Choolers; Sarocha Kesaro; Wittika Thangchan; Pott Pongpaopattanakul; Khwansupanat Phankasem; Muhammadrorfee-E Musor; Phutthiphat Autchaworaphong; Phongsak Muensakda; Khosit Chaiprasit; Chutima Yousomboon; Wisuta Mansing; Aubdul Aunampai; Nattaporn Nilwatta; Wipada Iamyam; Niramon Rasri; Piyawat Katewongsa
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.465

7.  Are Health Literacy and Physical Literacy Independent Concepts? A Gender-Stratified Analysis in Medical School Students from Croatia.

Authors:  Marijana Geets Kesic; Mia Peric; Barbara Gilic; Marko Manojlovic; Patrik Drid; Toni Modric; Zeljka Znidaric; Natasa Zenic; Aleksander Pajtler
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.