Literature DB >> 33258129

Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.

R Tamara Konetzka1, Daniel H Jung1, Rebecca J Gorges1, Prachi Sanghavi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for older dual-eligible recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and to explore possible mechanisms for the effect. DATA SOURCES: We use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), a national compilation of Medicaid claims, merged with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable. STUDY
DESIGN: We model the effects of HCBS using a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long-term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated. POPULATION STUDIED: 1,312,498 older adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare and are using long-term care. We also examine heterogeneity of effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: HCBS users have 10 percentage points higher (P < .01) annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed; rates of potentially avoidable hospitalizations are 3 percentage points higher (P < .01). These differences persist across races, dementia status, and intensity of HCBS spending.
CONCLUSIONS: Shifting Medicaid long-term care funding for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well-motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates for older dual eligibles. The quality and/or quantity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients. Hospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes-not just expansion-need more attention. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Medicare; dual eligibles; home- and community-based care; hospitalizations; long-term care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33258129      PMCID: PMC7704475          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  23 in total

Review 1.  Predicting elderly people's risk for nursing home placement, hospitalization, functional impairment, and mortality: a synthesis.

Authors:  E A Miller; W G Weissert
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies.

Authors:  Richard Schulz; Lynn M Martire
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Users of Medicaid home and community-based services are especially vulnerable to costly avoidable hospital admissions.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Sarita L Karon; D E B Potter
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Transitioning From Community-Based to Institutional Long-term Care: Comparing 1915(c) Waiver and PACE Enrollees.

Authors:  Micah Segelman; Xueya Cai; Christine van Reenen; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  Effects of Cash and Counseling on personal care and well-being.

Authors:  Barbara Lepidus Carlson; Leslie Foster; Stacy B Dale; Randall Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Separate and unequal: racial segregation and disparities in quality across U.S. nursing homes.

Authors:  David Barton Smith; Zhanlian Feng; Mary L Fennell; Jacqueline S Zinn; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The persistence of race and ethnicity in the use of long-term care.

Authors:  S P Wallace; L Levy-Storms; R S Kington; R M Andersen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Measuring State Medicaid Home Care Participation and Intensity Using Latent Variables.

Authors:  Judite Gonçalves; France Weaver; R Tamara Konetzka
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2018-07-06

10.  Hospitalization in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): rates, concomitants, and predictors.

Authors:  D Wieland; V L Lamb; S R Sutton; R Boland; M Clark; S Friedman; K Brummel-Smith; G P Eleazer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  2 in total

1.  Examining Consequences Related to Unmet Care Needs Across the Long-Term Care Continuum.

Authors:  Meghan Jenkins Morales; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Patient-sharing relationship between Chinese medicine doctors and other physicians: costs and outcomes of breast cancer survivorship care.

Authors:  Chiu-Mei Yeh; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Shun-Ku Lin; Chia-Jen Liu; Nicole Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.442

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.