| Literature DB >> 33258084 |
Sherna F Adenwalla1,2,3, Roseanne E Billany1,2,3, Daniel S March1,2,3, Gaurav S Gulsin1,3, Hannah M L Young4,5, Patrick Highton1,6, Darren C Churchward1, Robin Young7, Alysha Careless1, Clare L Tomlinson1, Gerry P McCann1,3, James O Burton1,2,6, Matthew P M Graham-Brown8,9,10.
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are often sedentary and decreased functional capacity associates with mortality. The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and physical function has not been fully explored. Understanding the relationships between prognostically relevant measures of CVD and physical function may offer insight into how exercise interventions might target specific elements of CVD. 130 patients on haemodialysis (mean age 57 ± 15 years, 73% male, dialysis vintage 1.3 years (0.5, 3.4), recruited to the CYCLE-HD trial (ISRCTN11299707), underwent cardiovascular phenotyping with cardiac MRI (left ventricular (LV) structure and function, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and native T1 mapping) and cardiac biomarker assessment. Participants completed the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and sit-to-stand 60 (STS60) as field-tests of physical function. Linear regression models identified CV determinants of physical function measures, adjusted for age, gender, BMI, diabetes, ethnicity and systolic blood pressure. Troponin I, PWV and global native T1 were univariate determinants of ISWT and STS60 performance. NT pro-BNP was a univariate determinant of ISWT performance. In multivariate models, NT pro-BNP and global native T1 were independent determinants of ISWT and STS60 performance. LV ejection fraction was an independent determinant of ISWT distance. However, age and diabetes had the strongest relationships with physical function. In conclusion, NT pro-BNP, global native T1 and LV ejection fraction were independent CV determinants of physical function. However, age and diabetes had the greatest independent influence. Targeting diabetic care may ameliorate deconditioning in these patients and a multimorbidity approach should be considered when developing exercise interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular function; ESKD; Global native T1; MRI; Physical activity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33258084 PMCID: PMC8026413 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02112-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Fig. 1Assessment of pulse wave velocity using two-dimensional phase-contrast CMR. For the PWV calculation, axial aortic contours were mapped onto phase–contrast cines (a), allowing the waveform transit time to be calculated from flow curves of the ascending and descending aorta (b). Distance was measured using a sagittal–oblique cine. Outer and inner borders of the aortic arch were manually drawn and the mean distance of these two borders was calculated (mm) (c). LV mass and volumes measured from a contiguous short-axis stack of cine images planned from long-axis view with endo and epicardial contours drawn at end-diastole and end-systole (d). Native T1 mapping of a short-axis ventricular slice of the left ventricle for assessment of myocardial fibrosis (e)
Demographic and baseline data of the CYCLE-HD cohort
| Baseline data of CYCLE-HD cohort n = 130 [Nmiss] | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57.2 ± 15 |
| Male, n (%) | 95 (73%) |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | |
| White | 58 (45%) |
| BAME | 72 (55%) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 143 ± 22 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76 ± 14 |
| Dialysis vintage (years) | 1.3 (0.5, 3.4) |
| Haemoglobin (g/L) | 111 ± 17 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 36.9 ± 5 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 14.0 (8, 34) |
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.0 ± 1.4 [28] |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.93 ± 1.39 [47] |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.7 (5, 7) [38] |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27 (23, 31) |
| Co-morbidities | |
| Ischaemic heart disease, n (%) | 16 (12%) [1] |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 86 (67%) [1] |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 49 (38%) [1] |
| Atrial Fibrillation, n (%) | 5 (4%) [1] |
| Previous renal transplant, n (%) | 20 (15%) |
| CMR measures of cardiovascular disease | |
| LVMi (g/m2) | 60 (50, 76) |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 53.6 ± 10 |
| LV mass/LV end-diastolic volume (g/mL) | 0.73 ± 0.2 |
| Global Native T1 (ms) | 1273.6 ± 40.8 [6] |
| Global longitudinal strain (%) | − 13.2 ± 3.3 |
| PWV (m/s) | 8.2 (6, 11) [13] |
| Humoral markers of cardiovascular disease | |
| NT pro-BNP (pg/ml) | 2693 (1136, 10121) [10] |
| Troponin I (ng/L) | 10.1 (6, 17) [6] |
| Baseline physical performance in field tests | |
| ISWT (m) | 220 (140, 360) [16]a |
| STS60 (reps) | 16.1 ± 11.5 [13]a |
[N] number of missing data values. Normally distributed data presented as mean ± SD, non-normally distributed data presented as median (25th, 75th percentile). LV indices indexed to body surface area
BAME Black, Asian and minority ethnic, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, CRP C-reactive protein, BMI body mass index, LV left ventricle, LVMi left ventricular mass index, PWV pulse wave velocity
aThe missing data for the physical function tests limited the numbers that could be included in univariate and multivariate regression models.
Univariate and multivariate linear regression models to assess cardiovascular determinants of performance in physical function tests
| Variable | Outcome | Univariate model | Multivariate modela | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants | B (SE) | P Value | Participants | B (SE) | P Value | R2 | ||
| Troponin I (ng/L)b | ISWT | 111 | − 39.84 (13.2) | 110 | − 16.80 (12.0) | 0.17 | 0.38 | |
| STS60 | 113 | − 1.87 (0.9) | 112 | − 0.23 (0.8) | 0.78 | 0.33 | ||
| NT pro-BNP (pg/ml) b | ISWT | 108 | − 22.83 (10.0) | 107 | − 20.33 (8.9) | 0.39 | ||
| STS60 | 110 | − 1.24 (0.7) | 0.06 | 109 | − 1.34 (0.6) | 0.35 | ||
| LVMi (g/m2) | ISWT | 114 | 0.86 (0.8) | 0.28 | 113 | − 0.31 (0.7) | 0.67 | 0.39 |
| STS60 | 117 | 0.04 (0.1) | 0.46 | 116 | − 0.03 (0.05) | 0.52 | 0.34 | |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | ISWT | 114 | 3.18 (1.6) | 0.06 | 113 | 3.74 (1.4) | 0.43 | |
| STS60 | 117 | 0.15 (0.1) | 0.16 | 116 | 0.14 (0.1) | 0.15 | 0.35 | |
| PWV (m/s) | ISWT | 103 | − 9.72 (3.2) | 102 | − 1.10 (3.2) | 0.74 | 0.39 | |
| STS60 | 106 | − 0.47 (0.2) | 105 | 0.11 (0.2) | 0.64 | 0.33 | ||
| LV mass:volume (g/mL) | ISWT | 114 | − 50.70 (99.7) | 0.61 | 113 | − 46.93 (82.9) | 0.57 | 0.39 |
| STS60 | 117 | − 1.27 (6.6) | 0.85 | 116 | − 0.45 (5.7) | 0.94 | 0.33 | |
| Global Native T1 (ms) | ISWT | 109 | − 1.45 (0.4) | 108 | − 1.29 (0.3) | 0.48 | ||
| STS60 | 112 | − 0.07 (0.03) | 111 | − 0.06 (0.02) | 0.36 | |||
| Global longitudinal strain (%) | ISWT | 114 | − 8.20 (5.0) | 0.10 | 116 | − 7.97 (4.3) | 0.07 | 0.41 |
| STS60 | 117 | − 0.48 (0.3) | 0.13 | 112 | − 0.27 (0.3) | 0.34 | 0.34 | |
The reference category for gender is ‘male’, for history of diabetes is ‘no’ and for ethnicity is ‘white’
BMI body mass index, LVMi left ventricular mass index, LV left ventricle, PWV pulse wave velocity, ISWT incremental shuttle walk test, STS60 sit-to-stand 60
aadjusted for age, gender, BMI, diabetic status, ethnicity and systolic blood pressure
bLog transformed data. B = unstandardized beta coefficient; SE = standard error of the mean