Literature DB >> 33258055

Mandrills learn two-day time intervals in a naturalistic foraging situation.

Kavel C D Ozturk1, Martijn Egas2, Karline R L Janmaat2,3,4.   

Abstract

Primates display high efficiency in finding food in complex environments. Knowledge that many plant species produce fruit simultaneously, can help primates to anticipate fruit finding at the start of fruiting seasons. Knowledge of elapsed time can help primates decide when to revisit food trees to find ripened fruit and to return before competitors find these fruits. To investigate whether mandrills are able to learn time intervals of recurring food, we recorded the foraging choices of captive mandrills in a group setting. We used a procedure with renewable food rewards that could be searched for: carrots and grapes, hidden underground in specific places with different renewal intervals (2 and 5 days, respectively). We monitored the first choice of location for individuals, if other individuals had not already searched at the same location, to exclude possible effects of individuals following others rather than relying on memory. Throughout the study, the mandrills became increasingly likely to first search at carrot locations on carrot days, while the probability of them searching at carrot locations decreased on days without carrot. Due to model instability, our results were inconclusive about an effect of grape days on the choice of the mandrills. Cues provided by conspecifics indicating the availability of simultaneously emerging food rewards did not affect the choice of the mandrills. We conclude that mandrills can take into account elapsed time in a foraging context. Thereby, this study indicates how mandrills can use temporal cognitive abilities to overcome temporal challenges of food-finding in a group setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraging cognition; Interval learning; Mandrills; Synchrony cues; Temporal memory; Time estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33258055     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01451-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  27 in total

Review 1.  Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception.

Authors:  Richard B Ivry; John E Schlerf
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Spatial memory and animal movement.

Authors:  William F Fagan; Mark A Lewis; Marie Auger-Méthé; Tal Avgar; Simon Benhamou; Greg Breed; Lara LaDage; Ulrike E Schlägel; Wen-wu Tang; Yannis P Papastamatiou; James Forester; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Comparison of volatiles, phenolics, sugars, antioxidant vitamins, and sensory quality of different colored carrot varieties.

Authors:  C Alasalvar; J M Grigor; D Zhang; P C Quantick; F Shahidi
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 4.  Pathogen Transmission from Humans to Great Apes is a Growing Threat to Primate Conservation.

Authors:  Emily Dunay; Kathleen Apakupakul; Stephen Leard; Jamie L Palmer; Sharon L Deem
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Behavioral research as physical enrichment for captive chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Marisa A Shender; Stephen R Ross
Journal:  Zoo Biol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.421

6.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use positive, but not negative, auditory cues to infer food location.

Authors:  Lisa A Heimbauer; Rebecca L Antworth; Michael J Owren
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Testing mechanisms of coexistence among two species of frugivorous primates.

Authors:  Alain Houle; William L Vickery; Colin A Chapman
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  Josep Call
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Memory for "what", "where", and "when" information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Megan L Hoffman; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

10.  Studying primate cognition in a social setting to improve validity and welfare: a literature review highlighting successful approaches.

Authors:  Katherine A Cronin; Sarah L Jacobson; Kristin E Bonnie; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Congratulations to Animal Cognition on its 50th birthday! Some thoughts on the last 50 years of animal cognition research.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.899

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.