Literature DB >> 3325741

Etoposide (VP16) and teniposide (VM26): novel anticancer drugs, strongly mutagenic in mammalian but not prokaryotic test systems.

R S Gupta1, A Bromke, D W Bryant, R Gupta, B Singh, D R McCalla.   

Abstract

The mutagenic effect of the antineoplastic drugs VP16 (etoposide; 4'-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside) and VM26 (teniposide; 4'-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-thenylidene-beta-D-glucopyr ano side) in mammalian and prokaryotic test systems have been compared. Both VP16 and VM26 which interact with mammalian DNA topoisomerase II, are strongly mutagenic in Chinese hamster ovary cells as indicated by the induction of mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase and adenosine kinase loci, and production of DNA strand breaks and sister-chromatid exchanges. Mouse L cells treated with these drugs also show a large dose-dependent (0.05-0.2 microgram/ml for VM26 and 0.5-1.5 micrograms/ml for VP16) increase in the frequency of 6-thioguanine-resistant mutants and extensive fragmentation of cellular DNA. In contrast to the results obtained with mammalian cells, VP16, which was extensively investigated, showed no increase in revertant frequencies in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 at concentrations up to greater than 500 micrograms/plate, in either the absence or presence of an exogenous rat liver activation system. However, a very weak mutagenic response to VP16 and VM26 (less than 2-fold increase in revertant frequency) at very high drug concentrations was observed in the strain TA102. VP16 also failed to show any mutagenic response (up to greater than 500 micrograms/ml) in an excision repair-proficient Escherichia coli strain 113/143 employing two different forward mutation detection systems [viz. ability to grow in galactose (Gal+) or in presence of 5-methyltryptophan], which are capable of detecting various types of genetic lesions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3325741     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/2.3.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  7 in total

Review 1.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Treatment-Induced Mutagenesis and Selective Pressures Sculpt Cancer Evolution.

Authors:  Subramanian Venkatesan; Charles Swanton; Barry S Taylor; Joseph F Costello
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Utility of a next-generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the pharmaceutical drug candidate etoposide.

Authors:  John Nicolette; Mirjam Luijten; Jennifer C Sasaki; Laura Custer; Michelle Embry; Roland Froetschl; George Johnson; Gladys Ouedraogo; Raja Settivari; Veronique Thybaud; Kerry L Dearfield
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.579

4.  A comprehensive survey of the mutagenic impact of common cancer cytotoxics.

Authors:  Bernadett Szikriszt; Ádám Póti; Orsolya Pipek; Marcin Krzystanek; Nnennaya Kanu; János Molnár; Dezső Ribli; Zoltán Szeltner; Gábor E Tusnády; István Csabai; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton; Dávid Szüts
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress:  Focus on Cell-Based Studies.

Authors:  Eva Vesela; Katarina Chroma; Zsofia Turi; Martin Mistrik
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  in Silico analysis of Escherichia coli polyphosphate kinase (PPK) as a novel antimicrobial drug target and its high throughput virtual screening against PubChem library.

Authors:  Saurav Bhaskar Saha; Vivek Verma
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-06-08

7.  Etoposide damages female germ cells in the developing ovary.

Authors:  Agnes Stefansdottir; Zoe C Johnston; Nicola Powles-Glover; Richard A Anderson; Ian R Adams; Norah Spears
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.