Literature DB >> 33257304

Shock in the cardiac intensive care unit: Changes in epidemiology and prognosis over time.

Jacob C Jentzer1, Abdelrahman M Ahmed2, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula3, Barry Burstein4, Meir Tabi5, Gregory W Barsness6, Joseph G Murphy7, Patricia J Best8, Malcolm R Bell9.   

Abstract

There are few studies documenting the changing epidemiology and outcomes of shock in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. We sought to describe the changes in shock epidemiology and outcomes over time in a CICU population.
METHODS: We included 1859 unique patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic Rochester CICU from 2007 through 2018 with an admission diagnosis of shock. Temporal trends, including mortality, were assessed across 3-year periods.
RESULTS: Shock comprised 15.1% of CICU admissions during the study period, increasing from 8.8% of CICU admissions in 2007 to 21.6% in 2018 (P < .01 for trend). Mean age was 68 ± 14 years (38% females). Shock was cardiogenic in 65%, septic in 10% and mixed cardiogenic-septic in 15%. Concomitant diagnoses in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 17%, heart failure (HF) in 35% and both in 40%. There was no significant change in the prevalence of individual shock subtypes over time (P > .1). Among patients with CS, the prevalence of ACS decreased and the prevalence of HF increased over time (P < .01). Hospital mortality was highest among patients with mixed shock (39%; P = .05). Among patients with CS, hospital mortality was lower among those with HF compared to those without HF (31% vs. 40%, P < .01). Hospital mortality decreased over time among patients with shock (P < .01) and CS (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of shock in the CICU has increased over time, with a substantial prevalence of mixed CS. The etiology of CS has changed over the last decade with HF overtaking ACS as the most common cause of CS in the CICU.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33257304     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quality of Heart Failure Care in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Thomas S Metkus; John Lindsley; Linda Fair; Sarah Riley; Stephen Berry; Sarina Sahetya; Steven Hsu; Nisha A Gilotra
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 6.592

2.  De Novo vs Acute-on-Chronic Presentations of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.

Authors:  Ankeet S Bhatt; David D Berg; Erin A Bohula; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Christopher F Barnett; James A Burke; Anthony P Carnicelli; Sunit-Preet Chaudhry; Lori B Daniels; James C Fang; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel A Gerber; Jianping Guo; Jacob C Jentzer; Jason N Katz; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Shashank S Sinha; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Sean Van Diepen; David A Morrow
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 6.592

3.  Association of annual hospital septic shock case volume and hospital mortality.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Xu-Dong Ma; Xiao-Hui Kang; Si-Fa Gao; Jin-Min Peng; Shan Li; Da-Wei Liu; Xiang Zhou; Li Weng; Bin Du
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  Echocardiographic left ventricular stroke work index: An integrated noninvasive measure of shock severity.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Brandon M Wiley; Nandan S Anavekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Sean van Diepen; Steven M Hollenberg; Patrick R Lawler; Kianoush B Kashani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Concomitant Sepsis Diagnoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: 15-Year National Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Anusha G Bhat; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shashank S Sinha; P Elliott Miller; Patrick R Lawler; Sean van Diepen; Ashish K Khanna; David X Zhao; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 7.  A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditi Shankar; Gayathri Gurumurthy; Lakshmi Sridharan; Divya Gupta; William J Nicholson; Wissam A Jaber; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-07

8.  Association Between the Acidemia, Lactic Acidosis, and Shock Severity With Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Benedikt Schrage; Parag C Patel; Kianoush B Kashani; Gregory W Barsness; David R Holmes; Stefan Blankenberg; Paulus Kirchhof; Dirk Westermann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.106

9.  Bedside intra-aortic balloon pump insertion in cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Luca Baldetti; Alessandro Beneduce; Antonio Boccellino; Matteo Pagnesi; Giuseppe Barone; Guglielmo Gallone; Antonio Napolano; Mario Gramegna; Francesco Calvo; Vittorio Pazzanese; Stefania Sacchi; Alberto M Cappelletti
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.585

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.