Literature DB >> 33257229

Compositional, structural and functional cuticle analysis of Prunus laurocerasus L. sheds light on cuticular barrier plasticity.

Clara Diarte1, Aline Xavier de Souza2, Simona Staiger2, Ann-Christin Deininger2, Amauri Bueno2, Markus Burghardt2, Jordi Graell1, Markus Riederer2, Isabel Lara1, Jana Leide3.   

Abstract

Barrier properties of the hydrophobic plant cuticle depend on its physicochemical composition. The cuticular compounds vary considerably among plant species but also among organs and tissues of the same plant and throughout developmental stages. As yet, these intraspecific modifications at the cuticular wax and cutin level are only rarely examined. Attempting to further elucidate cuticle profiles, we analysed the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the sclerophyllous leaf and three developmental stages of the drupe fruit of Prunus laurocerasus, an evergreen model plant native to temperate regions. According to gas chromatographic analyses, the cuticular waxes contained primarily pentacyclic triterpenoids dominated by ursolic acid, whereas the cutin biopolyester mainly consisted of 9/10,ω-dihydroxy hexadecanoic acid. Distinct organ- and side-specific patterns were found for cuticular lipid loads, compositions and carbon chain length distributions. Compositional variations led to different structural and functional barrier properties of the plant cuticle, which were investigated further microscopically, infrared spectroscopically and gravimetrically. The minimum water conductance was highlighted at 1 × 10-5 m s-1 for the perennial, hypostomatous P. laurocerasus leaf and at 8 × 10-5 m s-1 for the few-month-living, stomatous fruit suggesting organ-specific cuticular barrier demands.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATR-FTIR; Cuticular water permeability; Cuticular waxes; Cutin matrix; Minimum water conductance; Plant cuticle; Prunus laurocerasus

Year:  2020        PMID: 33257229     DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0981-9428            Impact factor:   4.270


  6 in total

1.  Multifunctional Contribution of the Inflated Fruiting Calyx: Implication for Cuticular Barrier Profiles of the Solanaceous Genera Physalis, Alkekengi, and Nicandra.

Authors:  Aline Xavier de Souza; Markus Riederer; Jana Leide
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Molecular Biology, Composition and Physiological Functions of Cuticle Lipids in Fleshy Fruits.

Authors:  Heriberto García-Coronado; Julio César Tafolla-Arellano; Miguel Ángel Hernández-Oñate; Alexel Jesús Burgara-Estrella; Jesús Martín Robles-Parra; Martín Ernesto Tiznado-Hernández
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Large differences in leaf cuticle conductance and its temperature response among 24 tropical tree species from across a rainfall gradient.

Authors:  Martijn Slot; Tantawat Nardwattanawong; Georgia G Hernández; Amauri Bueno; Markus Riederer; Klaus Winter
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 10.323

4.  Minimum Leaf Conductance (g min) Is Higher in the Treeline of Pinus uncinata Ram. in the Pyrenees: Michaelis' Hypothesis Revisited.

Authors:  Amauri Bueno; David Alonso-Forn; José Javier Peguero-Pina; Aline Xavier de Souza; Juan Pedro Ferrio; Domingo Sancho-Knapik; Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrín
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Leaf Cuticular Transpiration Barrier Organization in Tea Tree Under Normal Growth Conditions.

Authors:  Mingjie Chen; Yi Zhang; Xiangrui Kong; Zhenghua Du; Huiwen Zhou; Zhaoxi Yu; Jianheng Qin; Changsong Chen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  UHPLC-(ESI)-HRMS and NMR-Based Metabolomics Approach to Access the Seasonality of Byrsonima intermedia and Serjania marginata From Brazilian Cerrado Flora Diversity.

Authors:  Ana C Zanatta; Wagner Vilegas; RuAngelie Edrada-Ebel
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.221

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.