| Literature DB >> 33256149 |
Chisato Yamanaka1, Kimiko Kawata2.
Abstract
For heterosexual Japanese women in their early 20s, it is important to maintain good sexual health, develop intimate relationships with a partner, and go through the process of having a family. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of mother-daughter relationships among Japanese female university students and their associations with students' sexual risk-coping consciousness. We conducted a cross-sectional study using anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Participants were 329 female university students in their junior and senior years. The mother-daughter relationships of the study respondents were divided into the following three clusters: controlled group, close group, and independent group. The close and independent groups often consulted their mothers about sexual matters and, also, tended to be highly capable of actively expressing their opinions and cooperating with their partner in a sexual setting. In contrast, the controlled group revealed a significantly lower percentages of consulting their mothers on sexual matters and scored lower sexual risk-coping consciousness subscale scores. The controlled group may suffer a negative impact of the relationship with their controlling mothers as they try to build a good, trusting relationship with others. The characteristics of mother-daughter relationships may be associated with daughters' sexual risk-coping consciousness.Entities:
Keywords: female university students; mother-daughter relationship; sexual risk-coping consciousness
Year: 2020 PMID: 33256149 PMCID: PMC7730645 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Basic attributes (n = 329).
| Attributes | Options | Minimum | Maximum | Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 27 | 20.9 ± 0.9 | ||
| Department | Medical | 224 (68.1) | |||
| Other | 105 (31.9) | ||||
| Family living together | Living alone | 141 (43.0) | |||
| (multiple answers) | Living with family | 176 (53.3) | |||
| Other | 12 (3.7) | ||||
| Family structure | Father | 286 (86.9) | |||
| (multiple answers) | Mother | 329 (100) | |||
| Experience of sexual intercourse | Yes | 175 (53.5) | |||
| No | 118 (36.1) | ||||
| No response | 36 (10.9) | ||||
| Age of first sexual intercourse encounter ( | 12 | 21 | 18.6 ± 1.6 | ||
| Sexual partner currently dating | Yes | 131 (39.9) | |||
| No | 181 (55.2) | ||||
| No response | 17 (5.2) | ||||
| Sexual partner currently not dating | Yes | 33 (10.8) | |||
| No | 251 (82.3) | ||||
| No response | 45 (13.7) | ||||
| Number of sexual partners currently not dating ( | 1 | 4 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | ||
| Frequency of contraceptive use | Every time | 119 (68.0) | |||
| ( | Almost every time | 39 (22.3) | |||
| Rarely | 10 (5.7) | ||||
| Never | 2 (1.1) | ||||
| Currently not engaged in sexual intercourse | 4 (2.3) | ||||
| No response | 1 (0.6) | ||||
| History of induced abortion | Yes | 1 (0.6) | |||
| ( | No | 172 (98.3) | |||
| Don’t want to answer | 2 (1.1) | ||||
| History of sexually transmitted infections (multiple answers) | Chlamydia | 2 (1.1) | |||
| Candida | 8 (4.6) | ||||
| Others § | 0 (0) | ||||
| ( | Never | 164 (93.7) | |||
| No response | 7 (4.0) | ||||
* Those who answered they had experience with sexual intercourse (one was no response); † Those who answered they had a sexual partner they were currently not dating (one was no response); ‡ Those who answered that they had experience with sexual intercourse; § Syphilis, gonorrhea, condyloma acuminatum, genital herpes, and HIV.
Mother-daughter relationship scale: factor analysis results (n = 329).
| Item | α |
|---|---|
| Factor 1: Positive feelings toward mother (10 items) | 0.88 |
| Factor 2: Control by mother (6 items) | 0.84 |
| Factor 3: Past conflicts (4 items) | 0.91 |
| Factor 4: Dependency on mother (4 items) | 0.77 |
Figure 1Mother-daughter relationship scale: cluster analysis results (n = 329).
Sexual risk-coping consciousness: factor analysis results (n = 329).
| Item | α |
|---|---|
| Factor 1: Cooperative management type (6 items) | 0.82 |
| Factor 2: Active management type (6 items) | 0.75 |
| Factor 3: Self-management awareness (6 items) | 0.69 |
Figure 2Mother-daughter relationship clusters and percentage of those who indicated their “mother as a consultant” in each cluster (n = 329). † Options: mother, father, brother, sister, and other. Fisher’s exact test and multiple comparison test (Bonferroni correction). The number is the number of respondents, and the value in ( ) is the %. *** p < 0.001, * p< 0.05.
Figure 3Examination of sexual risk-coping consciousness scores in each mother-daughter relationship cluster (n = 329). Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple comparison test (Bonferroni correction); The value is the median, and the values in ( ) are the 25th and 75th percentiles; ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.