| Literature DB >> 33255746 |
Marta Hornyák1, Aneta Słomka2, Klaudia Sychta2, Michał Dziurka3, Przemysław Kopeć3, Jakub Pastuszak1, Anna Szczerba1, Agnieszka Płażek1.
Abstract
Despite abundant flowering throughout the season, common buckwheat develops a very low number of kernels probably due to competition for assimilates. We hypothesized that plants with a shorter flowering period may give a higher seed yield. To verify the hypothesis, we studied nutrient stress in vitro and in planta and analyzed different embryological and yield parameters, including hormone profile in the flowers. In vitro cultivated flowers on media with strongly reduced nutrient content demonstrated a drastic increase in degenerated embryo sacs. In in planta experiments, where 50% or 75% of flowers or all lateral ramifications were removed, the reduction of the flower competition by half turned out to be the most promising treatment for improving yield. This treatment increased the frequency of properly developed embryo sacs, the average number of mature seeds per plant, and their mass. Strong seed compensation under 50% inflorescence removal could result from increased production of salicylic and jasmonic acid that both favor more effective pollinator attraction. Plants in single-shoot cultivation finished their vegetation earlier, and they demonstrated greater single seed mass per plant than in control. This result suggests that plants of common buckwheat with shorter blooming period could deliver higher seed yield.Entities:
Keywords: common buckwheat; embryo sacs; nutrient stress; phytohormones; pollen grains; yield parameters
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33255746 PMCID: PMC7728371 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21238953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
The influence of medium content on in vitro cultured floral buds, and of flower removal on embryological parameters in cv. ‘Panda’ and ‘Korona’ of Fagopyrum esculentum.
| In Vitro | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | Content of Compounds (%) | Frequency (%) of Degenerating Embryo Sacs and Ovules | |||
| ‘Panda’ cv. | ‘Korona’ cv. | ||||
| 1 | 100 | 0 | 38 | ||
| 50 | 0 | 42 * | |||
| 30 | 68 * | 50 * | |||
| 2 | 100 | 15 | 36 | ||
| 50 | 14 | 50 * | |||
| 3 | 100 | 29 | 13 | ||
| 50 | 0 * | 38 * | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Control | 3.2 | 10 | 1.3 | 23 | |
| 1S | 3.1 | 50 * | 1.6 | 40 * | |
| 50% | 2.2 * | 15 | 0.9 | 3 * | |
| 75% | 1.1* | 66 * | 1.2 | 85 * | |
Chi-square test (p < 0.05) was performed separately for in vitro and in planta treatments. Means marked with asterisks (*) differ significantly from control. In vitro: Analysis performed on 25–30 ovules/treatment. For media content, see Section 4. Media with 100% composition were controls. In planta: Control, plants with all flowers and lateral ramifications; 1S, plants with only one main shoot; 50% and 75%, percentages of flowers removed.
Figure 1Fagopyrum esculentum (cv. ‘Korona’) floral buds and their internal ovule and embryo sac development impairment cultured in vitro on media with different content of sugar, vitamins, and macro- and microelements. The same features were observed in cv. ‘Panda’: (a) bud laid out on Medium 1 with full content of nutrients at the time 0; (b) bud after 10 days of culture on Medium 1 with 30% content of nutrients; (c) bud after 10 days of culture on Medium 1 with full content of nutrients; (d,e) degeneration of the cells of embryo sacs (arrows); and (e) shrunken embryo sac (arrow). Bars: (d,e) 20 µm; and (f) 200 µm. For media content, see Section 4.
Figure 2In planta degeneration of the embryo sacs cells and ovules after removal of 75% of flowers in Fagopyrum esculentum (cv. ‘Korona’). The same features were observed in cv. ‘Panda’: (a) 1-nucleate embryo sac (arrow); (b,c) egg apparatus of seven-cell embryo sacs (arrows); and (d) the whole ovule (arrow). Bars (a–c) 20 µm; and (d) 100 µm.
Figure 3Normal pollen, female gametophyte and embryo development in Fagopyrum esculentum (cv. ‘Korona’) after removal of 50% of flowers. The same features were observed in cv. ‘Panda’: (a) tetrads of microspores in blue callose sheath (arrow); (b) microspores released from the callose sheath; (c) vacuolated microspores with thick sporodermis (arrow); (d) 1-nucleate pollen grains, nuclei visible (arrow); (e) degenerated (D) and normal (N) pollen grains stained with Alexander dye; (f,g) 2-nucleate embryo sac-successive stages, nuclei marked with arrows; (h–k) cells of two seven-cell embryo sacs (antipodal cells not shown) with secondary nucleus (arrow), egg cell (stars), and synergids (triangles); (i–k) successive stages of the same embryo sac; (l) pollen tube penetrating one of the two synergids (arrow); and (m) globular proembryo. Bars: (a,f–m) 20 µm; (b,c) 50 µm; and (d) 100 µm.
Phytohormone content (µmol g−1 DW) in floral, and open and wilted flowers of common buckwheat plants of cv. ‘Korona’ cultivated with only one main shoot (1S) or after removal of 50% or 75% of flowers. Control, plants with all lateral ramifications and flowers. Analyses were done in the phase of full blooming.
| Hormones | Buds | Open Flowers | Wilted Flowers | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | |
| IAA | 73.5 ± 7.1 d | 124 ± 11 b | 102 ± 10 c | 149 ± 13 a | 67.9 ± 6.2 b | 81.7 ± 8.0 a | 64.3 ± 6.1 b | 47.2 ± 4.3 c | 157 ± 15 c | 189 ± 17 b | 253 ± 21 a | 66.1 ± 6.1 d |
| GAs | 8.29 ± 0.79 a | 8.14 ± 0.72 a | 3.51 ± 0.30 b | 8.50 ± 0.81 a | 7.40 ± 0.72 a,b | 6.45 ± 0.61 b | 4.59 ± 0.47 c | 8.67 ± 0.81 a | 7.40 ± 0.73 c | 11.1 ± 0.11 b | 6.87 ± 0.65 c | 15.1 ± 0.12 a |
| CYT | 2.88 ± 0.25 c | 8.93 ± 0.83 a | 2.55 ± 0.25 c | 3.91 ± 0.36 b | 3.78 ± 0.35 a | 3.92 ± 0.32 a | 2.10 ± 0.19 b | 3.36 ± 0.32 a | 4.09 ± 0.37 a | 4.43 ± 0.42 a | 4.49 ± 0.41 a | 2.40 ± 0.21 b |
| ABA | 2.16 ± 0.19 c | 1.55 ± 0.12 d | 2.92 ± 0.25 b | 3.50 ± 0.31 a | 4.04 ± 0.36 b | 2.69 ± 0.25 d | 5.63 ± 0.52 a | 3.53 ± 0.29 c | 3.45 ± 0.33 b | 1.80 ± 0.17 d | 4.09 ± 0.39 a | 2.52 ± 0.26 c |
| JA | 51.42 ± 5.07 c | 94.61 ± 9.11 b | 151 ± 14 a | 30.82 ± 3.98 d | 24.12 ± 2.95 c | 54.14 ± 5.12 a | 30.71 ± 2.76 b | 6.46 ± 0.68 d | 34.94 ± 3.32 b | 56.22 ± 5.21 a | 58.82 ± 5.76 a | 59.15 ± 5.78 a |
| SA | 22.6 ± 2.1 c | 77.8 ± 7.2 a | 86.8 ± 8.3 a | 41.9 ± 3.9 c | 18.8 ± 1.8 c | 62.4 ± 6.1 b | 105 ± 9.5 a | 65.1 ± 5.8 b | 33.2 ± 3.2 c | 96.7 ± 9.3 b | 124 ± 10.2 a | 31.7 ± 2.8 c |
| BA * | 31.3 ± 2.8 b | 68.4 ± 5.5 a | 62.7 ± 5.2 a | 28.6 ± 1.9 b | 21.2 ± 1.6 c | 33.2 ± 2.8 b | 41.8 ± 3.8 a | 27.6 ± 2.4 c | 16.2 ± 1.1 c | 25.9 ± 2.3 b | 38.4 ± 2.9 a | 36.4 ± 1.8 a |
Values represent means (n = 5 in each experiment) of two experiments performed during 2019–2020 ± SE (standard error). Different superscript letters (a–d) within rows for each hormone and organ indicate significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test; p < 0.05). IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; active GAs, sum of active gibberellins (GA1, GA3, GA4, GA5, GA6, and GA7); CYT, sum of cytokinins (kinetin, zeatin, N6-izopentenyladenine, and N6-izopentenyladenozine); ABA, abscisic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; SA, salicylic acid; * BA, benzoic acid, a precursor of salicylic acid.
Phytohormone content (µmol g−1 DW) in buds, open and wilted flowers of common buckwheat plants of cv. ‘Panda’ cultivated with only one main shoot (1S) and after removal of 50% or 75% of flowers. Control, plants with all lateral ramifications and flowers. Analyses were done in the phase of full blooming.
| Hormones | Buds | Open Flowers | Wilted Flowers | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | Control | 1S | 50% | 75% | |
| IAA | 173 ± 18 a | 77 ± 6 c | 110 ± 10 b | 110 ± 9 b | 91 ± 8 a | 73 ± 7 b | 69 ± 6 b | 71 ± 6 b | 287 ± 26 a | 267 ± 24 a | 133 ± 12 b | 134 ± 12 b |
| GAs | 5.84 ± 0.42 a | 4.47 ± 0.40 b | 6.22 ± 0.52 a | 4.63 ± 0.39 b | 6.22 ± 0.59 a | 6.87 ± 0.58 a | 5.65 ± 0.57 a | 5.60 ± 0.48 a | 6.15 ± 0.57 c | 10.85 ± 0.99 a | 8.67 ± 0.82 b | 10.26 ± 0.11 a |
| CYT | 3.58 ± 0.31 b | 2.53 ± 0.21 c | 5.09 ± 0.45 a | 3.29 ± 0.31 b | 3.72 ± 0.34 a,b | 3.46 ± 0.32 b | 4.16 ± 0.41 a | 3.83 ± 0.32 a | 3.22 ± 0.35 b | 4.39 ± 0.38 a | 5.01 ± 0.46 a | 3.27 ± 0.32 b |
| ABA | 2.74 ± 0.21 a | 1.88 ± 0.19 b | 1.51 ± 0.14 b | 1.30 ± 0.14 c | 5.36 ± 0.49 a | 3.99 ± 0.32 b | 3.75 ± 0.33 b | 2.78 ± 0.27 c | 3.31 ± 0.29 a | 2.54 ± 0.26 b | 1.92 ± 0.17 c | 3.43 ± 0.34 a |
| JA | 80.42 ± 7.01 a | 80.40 ± 0.76 a | 34.61 ± 3.20 c | 53.36 ± 5.01 b | 14.43 ± 1.42 b | 20.37 ± 2.04 a | 9.67 ± 0.91 c | 9.04 ± 0.90 c | 46.91 ± 4.05 a | 48.99 ± 4.12 a | 15.50 ± 1.40 c | 25.53 ± 2.61 b |
| SA | 56.93 ± 6.02 a | 25.62 ± 2.56 c | 33.07 ± 3.01 b | 59.37 ± 6.02 a | 44.59 ± 4.8 b | 40.49 ± 4.06 b | 40.08 ± 3.89 b | 71.24 ± 7.05 a | 65.29 ± 6.21 b | 48.02 ± 4.78 c | 45.0 ± 4.31 c | 139 ± 12 a |
| BA * | 29.80 ± 2.01 c | 66.00 ± 6.26 a | 43.10 ± 4.11 b | 45.31 ± 4.23 b | 21.55 ± 2.01 b | 27.43 ± 2.36 a | 30.05 ± 3.01 a | 26.90 ± 2.48 a | 24.68 ± 2.48 b | 36.72 ± 3.76 a | 34.91 ± 3.02 a | 22.43 ± 2.01 b |
Values represent means (n = 5 in each experiment) of two experiments performed during 2019–2020 ± SE (standard error). Different superscript letters (a–d) within rows for each hormone and organ indicate significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test; p < 0.05). * Benzoic acid is not a hormone but a precursor of salicylic acid. IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; active GAs, sum of active gibberellins (GA1, GA3, GA4, GA5, GA6, and GA7); CYT, sum of cytokinins (kinetin, zeatin, N6-izopentenyladenine, and N6-izopentenyladenozine); ABA, abscisic acid; JA, jasmonic acid; SA, salicylic acid; * BA, benzoic acid, a precursor of salicylic acid.
Analysis of variance of the impact of plant treatment (main shoot only, removal of 50% or 75% of flowers, and control) on flowering and fruiting in common buckwheat cv. ‘Panda’ and ‘Korona’. Efficiency of seed setting, seed mass, and mass of thousand seeds (MTS) were calculated per individual.
| Effects | No. of Flowers | No. of Mature Seeds | Empty Seeds (%) | Abortion of Flowers and Fruits (%) | Efficiency of Seed Setting | Mature Seed Mass | MTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | ns | *** | * | *** | ns | *** | *** |
| Treatment | *** | ** | *** | ns | ns | *** | *** |
| Cultivar x Treatment | ns | *** | ns | ns | * | *** | *** |
*, **, and *** indicate statistically significant effect of treatment at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively; ns, not significant.
Figure 4Macroscopic images of flower production (a,b) and seed setting (c–f) in cv. ‘Panda’ (a–d) and cv. ‘Korona’ (e,f) of Fagopyrum esculentum. Please compare control plants in bloom with plants from which 50% of flowers were removed:(a) vs. (b) and control plants in fruiting with plants with single shoot plants: (c) vs. (d,e) vs. (f).
Effect of removal of all lateral ramifications (1S) or 50% or 75% of flowers on flowering and fruiting parameters of two cultivars of common buckwheat. Control, plants with all flowers and lateral ramifications.
| Cultivar | Treatment | No. of Flowers per Plant | No. of Mature Seeds per Plant | No. of Empty Seeds per Plant | Abortion of Flowers and Seeds (%) | Efficiency of Fertilization (%) | Mass of One Seed | Seed Mass per Plant (g) | MTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Panda’ | Control | 669 ± 55 b | 128 ± 9 a,b | 29 ± 8 a | 81 | 19 | 0.0267 ± 0.003 e | 3.42 ± 0.07 c | 26.72 ± 1.41 b |
| 50% | 823 ± 74 a | 136 ± 11 a | 25 ± 5 a | 84 | 17 | 0.0292 ± 0.003 d | 3.97 ± 0.09 a | 29.19 ± 1.55 a | |
| 75% | 321 ± 29 e | 130 ± 12 a | 26 ± 4 a | 59 | 40 | 0.0252 ± 0.002 f | 3.27 ± 0.08 d | 25.15 ± 1.89 b | |
| 1 S | 357 ± 32 ed | 107 ± 9 b | 22 ± 5 a | 70 | 30 | 0.0266 ± 0.003 e | 2.85 ± 0.05 f | 26.63 ± 1.99 b | |
| ‘Korona’ | Control | 778 ± 69 a | 105 ± 10 b,c | 14 ± 2 b | 87 | 13 | 0.0311 ± 0.003 b | 3.27 ± 0.08 d | 31.14 ± 2.05 a |
| 50% | 558 ± 52 c | 125 ± 11 b | 16 ± 4 b | 78 | 22 | 0.0303 ± 0.002 c | 3.79 ± 0.07 b | 30.32 ± 2.03 a | |
| 75% | 442 ± 45 d | 100 ± 8 b,c | 22 ± 4 a | 77 | 23 | 0.0297 ± 0.003 c,d | 2.97 ± 0.06 e | 29.70 ± 2.07 a,b | |
| 1 S | 427 ± 38 d | 91 ± 7 c | 6 ± 2 c | 79 | 21 | 0.0334±0.003 a | 3.04 ± 0.08 e | 33.40 ± 2.27 a |
Values represent means (n = 20 in each experiment) of two experiments performed during 2019–2020 ± SE (standard error). Different superscript letters (a–f) within columns for each treatment and cultivar indicate significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test; p < 0.05). Percentage of flower and embryo abortion was calculated as: (1—No. of mature seeds/No. of flowers) × 100. Efficiency of fertilization was calculated as: (No. of mature seeds/No. of flowers) × 100.
Figure 5Inflorescences and lateral stem removal performed during in planta experiments on Fagopyrum esculentum in 2019 and 2020. C, control plant with all lateral ramifications and with all inflorescences; 50%, plant with half of the spike of spikelets (every second removed); 75%, plant with only 25% of spike of spikelets (every second, third, and fourth removed); 1S, single shoot plant (all lateral ramifications removed).