BACKGROUND: This prospective single-center study sought to investigate the impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) on the diagnosis of myocarditis, with special attention given to absolute T1 values and defined cutoff values. METHODS: All patients referred to our center with the suspicion of an inflammatory myocardial disease were diagnosed by a consensus expert consortium blinded to CMR findings. Classical Lake Louise criteria were then used to confirm or change the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of a total of 149 patients, 15 were diagnosed with acute myocarditis without taking CMR findings into account. Acute myocarditis was excluded in 91 patients, whereas 42 cases were unclear. Using classical Lake Louise criteria, an additional 35 clear diagnoses were made, either confirming or excluding myocarditis. In the remaining patients, there was no further increase in definitive diagnoses using T1 measurements. The diagnostic performance of T1 mapping in distinguishing acute myocarditis patients from healthy controls was good (area under the curve (AUC) 0.835, cutoff value 1019 ms, sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 72.4%). In the group of patients with suspected and then excluded myocarditis, the cutoff value had a false-positive rate of 56.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Acute myocarditis should be diagnosed on the basis of clinical and imaging factors, whereas T1 mapping could be helpful, especially for excluding acute myocarditis.
BACKGROUND: This prospective single-center study sought to investigate the impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) on the diagnosis of myocarditis, with special attention given to absolute T1 values and defined cutoff values. METHODS: All patients referred to our center with the suspicion of an inflammatory myocardial disease were diagnosed by a consensus expert consortium blinded to CMR findings. Classical Lake Louise criteria were then used to confirm or change the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of a total of 149 patients, 15 were diagnosed with acute myocarditis without taking CMR findings into account. Acute myocarditis was excluded in 91 patients, whereas 42 cases were unclear. Using classical Lake Louise criteria, an additional 35 clear diagnoses were made, either confirming or excluding myocarditis. In the remaining patients, there was no further increase in definitive diagnoses using T1 measurements. The diagnostic performance of T1 mapping in distinguishing acute myocarditispatients from healthy controls was good (area under the curve (AUC) 0.835, cutoff value 1019 ms, sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 72.4%). In the group of patients with suspected and then excluded myocarditis, the cutoff value had a false-positive rate of 56.6%. CONCLUSIONS:Acute myocarditis should be diagnosed on the basis of clinical and imaging factors, whereas T1 mapping could be helpful, especially for excluding acute myocarditis.
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alida L P Caforio; Sabine Pankuweit; Eloisa Arbustini; Cristina Basso; Juan Gimeno-Blanes; Stephan B Felix; Michael Fu; Tiina Heliö; Stephane Heymans; Roland Jahns; Karin Klingel; Ales Linhart; Bernhard Maisch; William McKenna; Jens Mogensen; Yigal M Pinto; Arsen Ristic; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Hubert Seggewiss; Luigi Tavazzi; Gaetano Thiene; Ali Yilmaz; Philippe Charron; Perry M Elliott Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Bettina Baessler; Christian Luecke; Julia Lurz; Karin Klingel; Arijit Das; Maximilian von Roeder; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Christian Besler; Karl-Philipp Rommel; David Maintz; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Thiele; Philipp Lurz Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Julian A Luetkens; Rami Homsi; Alois M Sprinkart; Jonas Doerner; Darius Dabir; Daniel L Kuetting; Wolfgang Block; René Andrié; Christian Stehning; Rolf Fimmers; Juergen Gieseke; Daniel K Thomas; Hans H Schild; Claas P Naehle Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Marc P Bonaca; Benjamin A Olenchock; Joe-Elie Salem; Stephen D Wiviott; Stephane Ederhy; Ariel Cohen; Garrick C Stewart; Toni K Choueiri; Marcelo Di Carli; Yves Allenbach; Dharam J Kumbhani; Lucie Heinzerling; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Alexander R Lyon; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Robert Padera; Andrew Lichtman; Peter P Liu; Douglas B Johnson; Javid Moslehi Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vanessa M Ferreira; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Godtfred Holmvang; Christopher M Kramer; Iacopo Carbone; Udo Sechtem; Ingrid Kindermann; Matthias Gutberlet; Leslie T Cooper; Peter Liu; Matthias G Friedrich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthias G Friedrich; Udo Sechtem; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Godtfred Holmvang; Pauline Alakija; Leslie T Cooper; James A White; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Matthias Gutberlet; Sanjay Prasad; Anthony Aletras; Jean-Pierre Laissy; Ian Paterson; Neil G Filipchuk; Andreas Kumar; Matthias Pauschinger; Peter Liu Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Philip Haaf; Pankaj Garg; Daniel R Messroghli; David A Broadbent; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Samuel Nunn; Johannes Kersten; Marijana Tadic; Alexander Wolf; Birgid Gonska; Elina Hüll; Hanna Dietenberger; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Dominik Buckert Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-02-14