| Literature DB >> 33255652 |
Salahaddin Kamrani1,2, Vahab Amiri3, Mosleh Kamrani4, Mohammed Baalousha5,6.
Abstract
Carbon dots (Entities:
Keywords: Pb remobilization; adsorption affinity; nitrogen functional groups carbon dot; quartz sand column; transport experiment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33255652 PMCID: PMC7728100 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectra of (red) nitrogen functionalized carbon dots (N-CDs) and (blue) nonfunctionalized carbon dots (CDs). (B) Raman spectra of N-CDs. (C) Raman spectra of CDs.
Zeta potential for nitrogen functionalized carbon dots (N-CDs) and sand grains at different pH and iconic strength (IS) solutions. N-CD/CD concentration: 50 mg·L−1.
| pH | IS (mM NaCl) | IS (mM CaCl2) | N-CDs Zeta Potential-mV (±2.5) | CDs Zeta Potential-mV (±2.5) | N-CD Hydrodynamic Diameter-nm (±5) | CD Hydrodynamic Diameter-nm (±5) | Quartz Grains Zeta Potential-mV (±2.5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 0 | −21.6 | −24.2 | 44.3 | 39.3 | −40 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | −26.2 | −29.6 | 30.7 | 24.6 | −65 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | −33.5 | −38.6 | 19.4 | 17.5 | −80 |
| 6 | 50 | 0 | −21.5 | −25.1 | 67.1 | 64.9 | −51.6 |
| 6 | 100 | 0 | −15.8 | −19.2 | 75.2 | 71.3 | −44.6 |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | −14.5 | −16.9 | 51.1 | 45.4 | −37.5 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | −28.2 | −33.8 | 25.5 | 21.3 | −75.3 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | −21 | −26.3 | 36.3 | 30.8 | −61.2 |
| 6 | 0 | 50 | −10.2 | −12 | 121.5 | 113.6 | −45.1 |
| 6 | 0 | 100 | −8.6 | −9.1 | 136.6 | 128.2 | −37.2 |
Figure 2Stability of 50 mg L−1 N-CD: (A) UV-vis spectra of N-CD/CD at 200 mg L−1. (B) Absorbance at 335 nm at different times after synthesis; (C) change in the absorbance at 335 nm at different pH; and (D) at different IS.
Figure 3Batch experiments of Pb adsorption on N-CD and CD under different pH (A). Ionic strength (IS) (B). Ten grams quartz, 25 mL Deionized water, N-CD/CD: 50 mg.L−1, Cu: 10 mg. L−1, and equilibrium time 120 min, background solution containing: NaCl (1 mM), NaHCO3 (1 mM).
Figure 4Breakthrough curve (BTC) of N-CD, CD, Bare Pb, released Pb (r-Pb) and tracer: NaCl (A), CaCl2 (B). All experiments were performed in C0 (N-CD/CD): 50 mg·L−1, C0 (Pb): 10 mg·L−1, pH6, background solution containing: 1 mM NaCl/CaCl2, NaHCO3 (1 mM), 1 rpm (3.075 mL·min−1) flow rate.
N-CDs, CDs, and Pb recovered in column experiments at different condition (Standard Deviation (STD) < 5%).
| Materials | Exp. Conditions | Recovered Nanoparticles (%) | Total Effluent Pb (%) | Recovered Pb after Nanoparticles Injection (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-CD (50mg/L, Pb: 10 mg/L) | 1 mM NaCl, pH 6 | 93.3 | 63.1 | 56.9 |
| 1 mM CaCl2, pH 6 | 91.1 | 58.2 | 53.4 | |
| 50 mM NaCl, pH 6 | 76.4 | 39.7 | 33.5 | |
| 50 mM CaCl2, pH 6 | 62.7 | 33.1 | 28.3 | |
| 100 mM NaCl, pH 6 | 65.2 | 27.8 | 21.6 | |
| 100 mM CaCl2, pH 6 | 48.5 | 16.1 | 11.3 | |
| 1 mM NaCl, pH 4 | 82.6 | 27.1 | 20.9 | |
| 1 mM CaCl2, pH 4 | 74.4 | 13.5 | 8.7 | |
| 1 mM NaCl, pH 9 | 98.2 | 31.7 | 25.5 | |
| 1 mM CaCl2, pH 9 | 98.4 | 17.9 | 13.1 | |
| Carbon Dot (CD: 50 mg/L) | 1 mM NaCl, Ph 6 | 96.1 | 56.8 | 50.6 |
| 1 mM CaCl2, pH 6 | 94.6 | 51.4 | 46.6 | |
| Effluent Pb (before nanoparticles injection) | 1 mM NaCl, pH 6 | - | 6.2 | - |
| Effluent Pb (before nanoparticles injection) | 1 mM CaCl2, pH 6 | - | 4.8 | - |
Figure 5Breakthrough curves (BTCs) of N-CD and released Pb (r-Pb) at different ionic strength: NaCl (A), CaCl2 (B). All experiments were performed in C0 (N-CD/CD): 50 mg·L−1, C0 (Pb): 10 mg·L−1, pH 6, background solution containing: 1 mM NaCl/CaCl2, NaHCO3 (1 mM), 1 rpm (3.075 mL·min−1) flow rate.
Figure 6Breakthrough curves (BTCs) of N-CD and released Pb (r-Pb) at different pH. NaCl (A), CaCl2 (B). All experiments were performed in C0 (N-CD/CD): 50 mg·L−1, C0 (Pb): 10 mg·L−1, pH6, background solution containing: 1 mM NaCl/CaCl2, NaHCO3 (1 mM), 1 rpm (3.075 mL·min−1) flow rate.