Literature DB >> 33255579

Effects of Labelling and Increasing the Proportion of Lower-Energy Density Products on Online Food Shopping: A Randomised Control Trial in High- and Low-Socioeconomic Position Participants.

Lucile Marty1, Brian Cook2, Carmen Piernas2, Susan A Jebb2, Eric Robinson1.   

Abstract

Reducing the energy density (ED) of product selections made during online supermarket food shopping has potential to decrease energy intake. Yet it is unclear which types of intervention are likely to be most effective and equitable. We recruited 899 UK adults of lower and higher socioeconomic position (SEP) who completed a shopping task in an online experimental supermarket. Participants were randomised in a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to test the effects of two interventions on the ED of shopping basket selections: labelling lower-ED products as healthier choices and increasing the relative availability of lower-ED products within a range (referred to as proportion). Labelling of lower-ED products resulted in a small but significant decrease (-4.2 kcal/100 g, 95% CIs -7.8 to -0.6) in the ED of the shopping basket. Increasing the proportion of lower-ED products significantly decreased the ED of the shopping basket (-17 kcal/100 g, 95% CIs -21 to -14). There was no evidence that the effect of either intervention was moderated by SEP. Thus, both types of intervention decreased the ED of foods selected in an online experimental supermarket. There was no evidence that the effectiveness of either intervention differed in people of lower vs. higher SEP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  availability; energy density; food choice; labelling; online; socioeconomic position; supermarket

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33255579      PMCID: PMC7760499          DOI: 10.3390/nu12123618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  23 in total

1.  Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women.

Authors:  N E Adler; E S Epel; G Castellazzo; J R Ickovics
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gill Cowburn; Lynn Stockley
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Liane S Roe; Jennifer S Meengs
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Reflections from a systematic review of dietary energy density and weight gain: is the inclusion of drinks valid?

Authors:  L Johnson; D C Wilks; A K Lindroos; S A Jebb
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 5.  Associations between dietary energy density and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Rouhani; Fahimeh Haghighatdoost; Pamela J Surkan; Leila Azadbakht
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  An effectiveness hierarchy of preventive interventions: neglected paradigm or self-evident truth?

Authors:  Simon Capewell; Ann Capewell
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Patrice Carter; Sumayya Anwer; Sarah E King; Susan A Jebb; David Ogilvie; Ian Shemilt; Julian P T Higgins; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 8.  Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact.

Authors:  Rory McGill; Elspeth Anwar; Lois Orton; Helen Bromley; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Martin O'Flaherty; David Taylor-Robinson; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Duncan Gillespie; Patricia Moreira; Kirk Allen; Lirije Hyseni; Nicola Calder; Mark Petticrew; Martin White; Margaret Whitehead; Simon Capewell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Optimising swaps to reduce the salt content of food purchases in a virtual online supermarket: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Payne Riches; Paul Aveyard; Carmen Piernas; Mike Rayner; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Prominent positioning and food swaps are effective interventions to reduce the saturated fat content of the shopping basket in an experimental online supermarket: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Koutoukidis; Susan A Jebb; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Michaela Noreik; Melina Tsiountsioura; Sarah Kennedy; Sarah Payne-Riches; Paul Aveyard; Carmen Piernas
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Josine M Stuber; Jeroen Lakerveld; Loes W Kievitsbosch; Joreintje D Mackenbach; Joline W J Beulens
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.775

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.