| Literature DB >> 33255579 |
Lucile Marty1, Brian Cook2, Carmen Piernas2, Susan A Jebb2, Eric Robinson1.
Abstract
Reducing the energy density (ED) of product selections made during online supermarket food shopping has potential to decrease energy intake. Yet it is unclear which types of intervention are likely to be most effective and equitable. We recruited 899 UK adults of lower and higher socioeconomic position (SEP) who completed a shopping task in an online experimental supermarket. Participants were randomised in a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to test the effects of two interventions on the ED of shopping basket selections: labelling lower-ED products as healthier choices and increasing the relative availability of lower-ED products within a range (referred to as proportion). Labelling of lower-ED products resulted in a small but significant decrease (-4.2 kcal/100 g, 95% CIs -7.8 to -0.6) in the ED of the shopping basket. Increasing the proportion of lower-ED products significantly decreased the ED of the shopping basket (-17 kcal/100 g, 95% CIs -21 to -14). There was no evidence that the effect of either intervention was moderated by SEP. Thus, both types of intervention decreased the ED of foods selected in an online experimental supermarket. There was no evidence that the effectiveness of either intervention differed in people of lower vs. higher SEP.Entities:
Keywords: availability; energy density; food choice; labelling; online; socioeconomic position; supermarket
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33255579 PMCID: PMC7760499 DOI: 10.3390/nu12123618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717