Literature DB >> 33255361

The Influence of Response Inhibition Training on Food Consumption and Implicit Attitudes toward Food among Female Restrained Eaters.

Noam Weinbach1, Eldad Keha2,3, Hila Leib2, Eyal Kalanthroff2.   

Abstract

Restrained eaters display difficulties engaging in self-control in the presence of food. Undergoing cognitive training to form associations between palatable food and response inhibition was found to improve self-control and influence eating behaviors. The present study assessed the impact of two such response inhibition trainings on food consumption, food-related anxiety, and implicit attitudes toward food among female restrained eaters (Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire-restrained eating subscale ≥ 2.5). In Experiment 1, 64 restrained eaters completed either one of two training procedures in which they were asked to classify food vs. non-food images: a food-response training, in which stop cues were always associated with non-food images, or a balanced food-response/inhibition training, in which participants inhibited motor actions to food and non-food stimuli equally. The results revealed reduced snack consumption following the food-response/inhibition training compared to the food-response training. The food-response training was associated with increased levels of food-related anxiety. In Experiment 2, the same training procedures were administered to 47 restrained eaters, and implicit attitudes toward palatable foods were assessed. The results revealed an increase in positive implicit attitudes toward palatable foods in the food-response/inhibition group but not in the food-response training group. The results suggest that balancing response inhibition and execution across food and non-food stimuli may reduce overeating while retaining positive attitudes toward food among female restrained eaters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive training; implicit associations; inhibitory control; response inhibition; restrained eating; stop-signal task

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33255361      PMCID: PMC7760709          DOI: 10.3390/nu12123609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  36 in total

1.  On being led into temptation: "counterregulation" of dieters after smelling a "preload".

Authors:  A Jansen; M van den Hout
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  From dietary restraint to binge eating: some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  R J Tuschl
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Who likes it more? Restrained eaters' implicit attitudes towards food.

Authors:  Esther K Papies; Wolfgang Stroebe; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa Allom; Barbara Mullan; Martin Hagger
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 5.  Restrained Eating and Food Cues: Recent Findings and Conclusions.

Authors:  Janet Polivy; C Peter Herman
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  A systematic review of the relationship between eating, weight and inhibitory control using the stop signal task.

Authors:  Savani Bartholdy; Bethan Dalton; Owen G O'Daly; Iain C Campbell; Ulrike Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Engagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Eliza Congdon; Jeanette A Mumford; Jessica R Cohen; Adriana Galvan; Adam R Aron; Gui Xue; Eric Miller; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Resisting the urge to smoke: inhibitory control training in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Sally Adams; Claire Mokrysz; Angela S Attwood; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inter-Individual Differences in Food Addiction and Other Forms of Addictive-Like Eating Behavior.

Authors:  Paul Brunault; Nicolas Ballon
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.