Haojie Wen 1 , Jinyong Tang 1 , Minghua Hou 1 , Yi Cui 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Objective:To compare the therapeutic effect of otoendoscopic tympanoplasty with acellular dermal allograft(AlloDerm) and tragus cartilage perichondrium. Method:121 patients who underwent type Ⅰ tympanoplasty under otoscope were retrospectively analyzed. According to the grafts used, they were divided into two groups: AlloDerm group (56 cases) and tragus cartilage perichondrium group (65 cases). The operative time, postoperative tympanic membrane healing rate, and hearing recovery were compared between two groups. The follow-up time was twelve months. Result:The operative time in the AlloDerm group were lower than those in the tragus cartilage perichondrium group(P<0.05). The successful closure rates between the acellular dermal allograft group and tragus cartilage perichondrium group at 1-month follow-up were 92.86% and 92.31% respectively, while the closure rates between two groups at 6-month follow-up were drop to 91.07% and 90.77% respectively, the closure rates between two groups at 12-month follow-up were also 91.07% and 90.77% respectively,the was no statistically difference between two groups(P>0.05). The difference in pre-and post-operative air bone gap(ABG) values between two groups was no statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: Both the AlloDerm and the tragus cartilage perichondrium tympanoplasty can achieve satisfactory healing rate of the tympanic membrane and audiologic improvement. However, AlloDerm has a short operation time, no need to obtain materials and less trauma, and is worth of promotion and application. Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Objective:To compare the therapeutic effect of otoendoscopic tympanoplasty with acellular dermal allograft(AlloDerm) and tragus cartilage perichondrium. Method:121 patients who underwent type Ⅰ tympanoplasty under otoscope were retrospectively analyzed. According to the grafts used, they were divided into two groups: AlloDerm group (56 cases) and tragus cartilage perichondrium group (65 cases). The operative time, postoperative tympanic membrane healing rate, and hearing recovery were compared between two groups. The follow-up time was twelve months. Result:The operative time in the AlloDerm group were lower than those in the tragus cartilage perichondrium group(P<0.05). The successful closure rates between the acellular dermal allograft group and tragus cartilage perichondrium group at 1-month follow-up were 92.86% and 92.31% respectively, while the closure rates between two groups at 6-month follow-up were drop to 91.07% and 90.77% respectively, the closure rates between two groups at 12-month follow-up were also 91.07% and 90.77% respectively,the was no statistically difference between two groups(P>0.05). The difference in pre-and post-operative air bone gap(ABG) values between two groups was no statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion: Both the AlloDerm and the tragus cartilage perichondrium tympanoplasty can achieve satisfactory healing rate of the tympanic membrane and audiologic improvement. However, AlloDerm has a short operation time, no need to obtain materials and less trauma , and is worth of promotion and application. Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
acellular dermal allograft; otoendoscopy; tragus cartilage perichondrium; treatment effectiveness; tympanoplasty
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2020
PMID: 33254345 DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.12.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi ISSN: 2096-7993