Literature DB >> 33254053

The weirdness of belief in free will.

Renatas Berniūnas1, Audrius Beinorius2, Vilius Dranseika3, Vytis Silius2, Paulius Rimkevičius2.   

Abstract

It has been argued that belief in free will is socially consequential and psychologically universal. In this paper we look at the folk concept of free will and its critical assessment in the context of recent psychological research. Is there a widespread consensus about the conceptual content of free will? We compared English "free will" with its lexical equivalents in Lithuanian, Hindi, Chinese and Mongolian languages and found that unlike Lithuanian, Chinese, Hindi and Mongolian lexical expressions of "free will" do not refer to the same concept free will. What kind people have been studied so far? A review of papers indicate that, overall, 91% of participants in studies on belief in free will were WEIRD. Thus, given that free will has no cross-culturally universal conceptual content and that most of the reviewed studies were based on WEIRD samples, belief in free will is not a psychological universal.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belief in free will; Cognitive anthropology; Concepts; Construct validity; Cross-cultural research; Experimental philosophy; External validity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33254053     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  2 in total

1.  The relationship between fatalistic beliefs and well-being depends on personal and national religiosity: A study in 34 countries.

Authors:  Mohsen Joshanloo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  The typicality effect in basic needs.

Authors:  Thomas Pölzler; Ivar R Hannikainen
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 1.595

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.