| Literature DB >> 33253762 |
Fabiane Valentini Francisqueti-Ferron1, Jéssica Leite Garcia2, Artur Junio Togneri Ferron2, Erika Tiemi Nakandakare-Maia2, Cristina Schmitt Gregolin2, Janaina Paixão das Chagas Silva3, Klinsmann Carolo Dos Santos2, Ângelo Thompson Colombo Lo2, Juliana Silva Siqueira3, Letícia de Mattei2, Bruno Henrique de Paula3, Felipe Sarzi4, Carol Cristina Vágula de Almeida Silva2, Fernando Moreto2, Mariane Róvero Costa2, Ana Lucia A Ferreira2, Igor Otávio Minatel3, Camila Renata Corrêa2.
Abstract
The literature has reported a higher prevalence of negative clinical outcomes due to Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in obese individuals. This can be explained by the cytokine storm, result from the cytokine production from both obesity and viral infection. Gamma-oryzanol (γOz) is a compound with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities. However, little is known about the γOz action as a possible agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that γOz attenuates the cytokine storm by stimulating PPAR-γ in the adipose tissue.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Gamma-oryzanol; Obesity; PPAR-γ
Year: 2020 PMID: 33253762 PMCID: PMC7695949 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.111095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol ISSN: 0303-7207 Impact factor: 4.102
Nutritional, hormonal and cardiometabolic parameters.
| Control | HSF | HSF + γOz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chow fed (g/day) | 24.41 ± 2.80a | 12.10 ± 2.24b | 10.45 ± 1.26b |
| Water intake (ml/day) | 34.22 ± 5.00a | 43.51 ± 2.41b | 44.39 ± 7.26b |
| Caloric intake (kcal/day) | 87.7 ± 10.0 | 94.8 ± 8.7 | 91.6 ± 8.2 |
| Final body weight (g) | 492 ± 58a | 591 ± 63b | 496 ± 58a |
| Adiposity index (%) | 4.53 ± 0.36a | 9.10 ± 1.95b | 6.33 ± 1.78a |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 74.8 ± 20.3a | 123 ± 7b | 93.7 ± 8.8a |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.83 (0.77–0.83)a | 3.80 (3.80–4.05)b | 2.40 (2.10–2.80)b |
| HOMA-IR | 6.02 ± 1.74a | 44.1 ± 7.7b | 18.3 ± 2.1c |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 58.3 ± 16.1a | 117 ± 3b | 80.3 ± 12.5c |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 0.45 ± 0.31a | 9.66 ± 1.09b | 2.60 ± 0.63c |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 17918 ± 2548a | 31950 ± 1432b | 32443 ± 5174b |
Fig. 1Systolic blood pressure and echocardiogram parameters. A- systolic blood pressure (mmHg); B- left ventricular mass (g); C- Relative wall thickness; D- ejection fraction (%). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Comparison by One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc. HSF—high sugar- fat diet. γOz—Gamma-oryzanol.
Fig. 2Histological analysis of adipose tissue. A- Adipocytes- histological section of adipose tissue colored by hematoxylin-eosin. A1- Control; A2- HSF; A3- HSF + γOz; B- adipocytes number by field. C- Adipocyte area (µm²). Data are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. Comparison by One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc. HSF—high sugar- fat diet. γOz—Gamma-oryzanol. Analysis were made under 40x magnification.
Fig. 3Inflammatory parameters in epididymal adipose tissue. A- MCP-1 (pg/g protein); B- IL-6 (pg/g protein); C- TNF- α (pg/g protein). Data expressed in mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range. Comparison by One-way ANOVA with Tukey or Kruskal- Wallis post-hoc. HSF—high sugar- fat diet. γOz—Gamma-oryzanol.
Fig. 4Epididymal adipose tissue oxidative stress parameters. A- MDA: Malondialdehyde levels; B- carbonylation levels. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range. Comparison by One-way ANOVA with Tukey or Kruskal- Wallis post-hoc. HSF—high sugar- fat diet. γOz—Gamma-oryzanol.
Fig. 5Adipose tissue PPAR- γ expression. A-gene expression by Real time PCR; B- protein expression by Western Blot. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Comparison by One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc. HSF—high sugar-fat diet. γOz—Gamma-oryzanol.