Bo Bach1, Sebastian Simonsen2. 1. Psychiatric Research Unit, Center for Personality Disorder Research, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse. 2. Department of Personality Disorders and Trauma, Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) classifies personality disturbance according to levels of severity. This article reviews the literature on levels of personality functioning in relation to clinical management and treatment, and proposes how these findings apply to the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Findings were primarily derived from studies using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization, and the general P-factor of personality disorder. Severity of personality dysfunction is related to treatment outcome, risk of dropout, therapeutic alliance, readiness for treatment, risk of harm to self or others, risk of dissociation and psychotic-like breaks, coherence in narrative identity, reflective functioning, and epistemic trust. SUMMARY: The overall level of personality disorder severity indicates risk of negative outcomes and may be used as decision tool for 'personalized medicine' and required treatment intensity (e.g., strength of alliance and the need for establishing epistemic trust). Beyond the ICD-11 guidelines for determining personality disorder severity, these implications also apply to practitioners using comparable frameworks such as the DSM-5 LPFS and Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization. Future research should focus on the interaction of severity with trait qualifiers in relation to clinical management.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) classifies personality disturbance according to levels of severity. This article reviews the literature on levels of personality functioning in relation to clinical management and treatment, and proposes how these findings apply to the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Findings were primarily derived from studies using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization, and the general P-factor of personality disorder. Severity of personality dysfunction is related to treatment outcome, risk of dropout, therapeutic alliance, readiness for treatment, risk of harm to self or others, risk of dissociation and psychotic-like breaks, coherence in narrative identity, reflective functioning, and epistemic trust. SUMMARY: The overall level of personality disorder severity indicates risk of negative outcomes and may be used as decision tool for 'personalized medicine' and required treatment intensity (e.g., strength of alliance and the need for establishing epistemic trust). Beyond the ICD-11 guidelines for determining personality disorder severity, these implications also apply to practitioners using comparable frameworks such as the DSM-5 LPFS and Kernberg's Level of Personality Organization. Future research should focus on the interaction of severity with trait qualifiers in relation to clinical management.
Authors: Bo Bach; Ueli Kramer; Stephan Doering; Ester di Giacomo; Joost Hutsebaut; Andres Kaera; Chiara De Panfilis; Christian Schmahl; Michaela Swales; Svenja Taubner; Babette Renneberg Journal: Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Joseph C Geraci; Erin P Finley; Emily R Edwards; Sheila Frankfurt; A Solomon Kurz; Nipa Kamdar; Megan E Vanneman; Leonard M Lopoo; Hannah Patnaik; Jean Yoon; Nicholas Armstrong; Ashley L Greene; Gilly Cantor; Joseph Wrobleski; Erin Young; Matthew Goldsmith; Richard W Seim; Marianne Goodman Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 7.960
Authors: Hanna Kampling; Johannes Kruse; Astrid Lampe; Tobias Nolte; Nora Hettich; Elmar Brähler; Cedric Sachser; Jörg M Fegert; Stephan Gingelmaier; Peter Fonagy; Lina Krakau; Sandra Zara; David Riedl Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 5.435