| Literature DB >> 33252278 |
Rowa H M Taha1, Douglas Grindlay1, Sandeep Deshmukh1, Alan Montgomery1, Tim R C Davis2, Alexia Karantana1,2.
Abstract
Metacarpal shaft fractures are common hand injuries that predominantly affect younger patients. There is wide variability in their treatment with no consensus on best practice. We performed a systematic review to assess the breadth and quality of available evidence supporting different treatment modalities for metacarpal shaft fractures of the finger digits in adults. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 1600 records were identified; 7 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included. No randomized controlled trials directly comparing surgery with nonsurgical treatment were found. One retrospective study compared nonsurgical with surgical treatment, whereas 6 compared surgical or nonsurgical treatments. Considerable heterogeneity between studies along with a high or critical risk of bias restricts direct comparison and conclusions. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide treatment, supporting the need for well-designed, multicenter trials to identify the most effective and cost-efficient treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures in adults.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis; evaluation; finger; fracture/dislocation; research and health outcomes; trauma; treatment
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33252278 PMCID: PMC9465778 DOI: 10.1177/1558944720974363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hand (N Y) ISSN: 1558-9447