Literature DB >> 3325220

Multiple insulin injections using a pen injector versus insulin pump treatment in young diabetic patients.

J F Bak1, O H Nielsen, O Pedersen, H Beck-Nielsen.   

Abstract

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of 6 months duration was compared with 6 months of multiple insulin injections (MII) using a pen injector (NovoPen) in a prospective cross-over study with 20 young insulin dependent diabetics by evaluating metabolic control, insulin requirements and patient acceptability. Following both intensified regimens (CSII/MII) serum fructosamine declined significantly from 4.1 +/- 0.7 to 3.4 +/- 0.5 mmol/l and 3.6 +/- 0.7 mmol/l respectively (normal range: 2.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). When comparing CSII and MII no significant differences could be demonstrated in mean blood glucose (MBG), fasting plasma ketone bodies, fasting plasma free fatty acids (FFA), fasting plasma human growth hormone (HGH), fasting plasma glucagon or serum fructosamine. Mean insulin requirement was 11.4% higher during MII and glucose instability--demonstrated by the M-values and by the frequency of blood glucose values below 4 mmol/l--was significantly (p less than 0.02) higher during the MII treatment. All of the patients reported a better well-being on both treatment regimens and none of them wanted to go back to conventional therapy (CT). In conclusion, on a long-term basis both regimens result in identical metabolic control, but due to physical discomfort during pump treatment, the insulin pen injector was preferred by the majority (80%) of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3325220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res        ISSN: 0265-5985


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D I Johnston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Recent developments in insulin delivery techniques. Current status and future potential.

Authors:  F P Kennedy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with intensive insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  John Pickup; Martin Mattock; Sally Kerry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

Review 4.  A review of 20 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin injection devices.

Authors:  Jørn Rex; Klaus H Jensen; Simon A Lawton
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Jeitler; K Horvath; A Berghold; T W Gratzer; K Neeser; T R Pieber; A Siebenhofer
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Long term feasibility of multiple daily injections with insulin pens in children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  N Tubiana-Rufi; C Levy-Marchal; E Mugnier; P Czernichow
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  A review of 25 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin pens in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jacob Hyllested-Winge; Klaus H Jensen; Jørn Rex
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.580

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.