Literature DB >> 33252154

Assessing the Quality of Care Delivered to Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients with Cancer in Ireland: A Case Series.

Carolyn Moloney1,2,3, Margaret Allen1, Derek G Power1,2, Richard M Bambury1, Deirdre O'Mahony1, Dearbhaile M O'Donnell1, Seamus O'Reilly1, Dearbhaile C Collins3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: "Transgender" and "gender diverse" are umbrella terms encompassing those whose gender identities or expressions differ from those typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth. There is scant global information on cancer incidence, outcome, and mortality for this cohort. This group may present with advanced cancer, have mistrust in health care services and report anxiety and depression at higher frequencies, a finding often seen in marginalized groups because of minority stress.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical oncologists were contacted by secure email to identify patients who self-identify as transgender and gender diverse in three Irish hospitals. Five patients were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted and a pseudonymized patient survey was distributed.
RESULTS: All patients included in our chart review (n = 5) were diagnosed with advanced disease on initial diagnosis. Two patients identified as men, two as women, and one as a transwoman. Two of five patients' health record charts reflected a name or gender change. Three patients had gender transitioning treatment postponed. Assessing comorbidities, it was seen that four patients required psychiatry input. Predominant issues noted in our patient survey by the two respondents (n = 2) were "mis-gendering," lack of a gender-neutral hospital environment, lack of inclusion in cancer groups, and barriers in changing name and/or sex on hospital records.
CONCLUSION: Components of care requiring revision include patient accessible pathways to change names and gender on health records, earlier access to psychological support and targeted screening and support groups. Resources for hospital staff to improve awareness of correct terminology and to provide gender neutral facilities are worthwhile. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The implications for practice on an international level include patient-friendly pathways for changing hospital name and gender so that patients may feel comfortable using wristbands. The need for international screening guidelines for transgender patients and national transgender cancer support groups is highlighted. On a day-to-day level for providers, the correct use of pronouns makes a big difference to patients. Asking about preferred pronoun on first visit and noting on patient's file is worthwhile. It is important for providers to know that increased psychological support should be offered early on first clinic visit and engaged with as necessary when patient has a history of anxiety or depression. Providers should discuss openly that some gender transitioning treatment will be postponed because of cancer care and refer to both the physical and psychological sequelae of this. Asking transgender patients which room or bathroom they would prefer when rooms are gendered is essential.
© 2020 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case series; Disparity; Gender diverse; Quality of care; Transgender cancer care

Year:  2020        PMID: 33252154      PMCID: PMC8018305          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  12 in total

1.  Cancer risk in the transgender community.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Correlates of clinical breast examination among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer women.

Authors:  Ashley Lacombe-Duncan; Carmen H Logie
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences Among Trans-Masculine Individuals: Patient-Collected Human Papillomavirus Vaginal Swabs Versus Provider-Administered Pap Tests.

Authors:  Michal McDowell; Dana J Pardee; Sarah Peitzmeier; Sari L Reisner; Madina Agénor; Natalie Alizaga; Ida Bernstein; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.151

4.  Screening programs overlook transgender people.

Authors:  Lauren Vogel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Frequency and distribution of primary site among gender minority cancer patients: An analysis of U.S. national surveillance data.

Authors:  Rebecca Nash; Kevin C Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; David E Sandberg; Vin Tangpricha; Michael Goodman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Cancer in Transgender Patients: One Case in 385,820 Is Indicative of a Paucity of Data.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake; Deborah J Lightner; Fernando J Quevedo; Donna C Ertz; Aminah Jatoi
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Gender and Health: Beyond Binary Categorical Measurement.

Authors:  Chloe Grace Hart; Aliya Saperstein; Devon Magliozzi; Laurel Westbrook
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  National Survey of Oncologists at National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors About LGBTQ Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Catherine A Blackburn; Megan E Sutter; Peter A Kanetsky; Susan T Vadaparampil; Vani N Simmons; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Incidence of breast cancer in a cohort of 5,135 transgender veterans.

Authors:  George R Brown; Kenneth T Jones
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of the US transgender population.

Authors:  Walter O Bockting; Michael H Miner; Rebecca E Swinburne Romine; Autumn Hamilton; Eli Coleman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.