| Literature DB >> 33252025 |
Pablo Parodi1, Luis G Corbellini2, Vanessa B Leotti3, Rodolfo Rivero4, Cecilia Miraballes1, Franklin Riet-Correa1, José M Venzal5, María T Armúa-Fernández5.
Abstract
Detection of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale is based on the reading of Giemsa-stained blood or organ smears, which can have low sensitivity. Our aim was to improve the detection of bovine Babesia spp. and A. marginale by validating a multiplex PCR (mPCR). We used 466 samples of blood and/or organs of animals with signs and presumptive autopsy findings of babesiosis or anaplasmosis. The primers in our mPCR amplified the rap-1a gene region of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, and the msp-5 region of A. marginale. We used a Bayesian model with a non-informative priori distribution for the prevalence estimate and informative priori distribution for estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for smear detection of Babesia spp. were 68.6% and 99.1%, and for A. marginale 85.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for mPCR detection for Babesia spp. were 94.2% and 97.1%, and for A. marginale 95.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Our mPCR had good accuracy in detecting Babesia spp. and A. marginale, and would be a reliable test for veterinarians to choose the correct treatment for each agent.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma marginale; Babesia spp; cattle; multiplex PCR; sensitivity; specificity; tick-borne diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33252025 PMCID: PMC7758682 DOI: 10.1177/1040638720975742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Diagn Invest ISSN: 1040-6387 Impact factor: 1.279