Literature DB >> 33251620

Actinic cheilitis: a systematic review of treatment options.

M H Trager1, K Farmer2, C Ulrich2, N Basset-Seguin3,4,5, F Herms3, L J Geskin1, J-D Bouaziz3,4,5, C Lebbé3,4,5, A de Masson3,4,5, M Bagot3,4,5, G Dobos3,4,5.   

Abstract

Actinic cheilitis is a premalignant condition that can progress to squamous cell carcinoma with a higher propensity for metastasis than cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Optimal treatment for actinic cheilitis has not been established, and evidence-based estimates of clinical cure in the dermatology literature are limited. Here, we review and synthesize outcome data published for patients with actinic cheilitis after treatment with various modalities. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library for English, French and German-language studies and references of included articles from inception to 20 January 2020. Studies were included if they reported on at least six patients with biopsy-proven actinic cheilitis. After quality appraisal, results of studies with the strongest methodology criteria were synthesized. 18 studies of 411 patients (published 1985 to 2016) were included. The majority of the studies were case series. Carbon dioxide laser ablation and vermilionectomy were associated with the most favourable outcomes with fewest recurrences. Chemical peel and photodynamic therapy were associated with higher recurrence. Adverse effects generally resolved in the weeks following treatment and cosmetic outcomes were favourable overall. In conclusion, there is a lack of high-quality comparative studies evaluating different treatment options for actinic cheilitis. The included publications used various outcome measures; however, the majority reported on the recently defined core outcome sets. These results suggest that both carbon dioxide laser ablation and vermilionectomy are effective treatments for actinic cheilitis. Prospective head-to-head studies are needed to compare these treatment modalities and to assess patient preferences.
© 2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33251620     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Applications of Plasma-Activated Water in Dentistry: A Review.

Authors:  Noala Vicensoto Moreira Milhan; William Chiappim; Aline da Graça Sampaio; Mariana Raquel da Cruz Vegian; Rodrigo Sávio Pessoa; Cristiane Yumi Koga-Ito
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Risk factors for actinic cheilitis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla; Amna Irfan-Bhatti
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2021-12-05

Review 3.  Actinic Cheilitis - From Risk Factors to Therapy.

Authors:  Alina Vasilovici; Loredana Ungureanu; Lavinia Grigore; Elena Cojocaru; Simona Şenilă
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 4.  SARS-CoV-2 and Skin: New Insights and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gerardo Cazzato; Eliano Cascardi; Anna Colagrande; Caterina Foti; Alessandra Stellacci; Maricla Marrone; Giuseppe Ingravallo; Francesca Arezzo; Vera Loizzi; Antonio Giovanni Solimando; Paola Parente; Eugenio Maiorano; Gennaro Cormio; Angelo Vacca; Leonardo Resta
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-31

5.  Ischemic stroke and purpuric dermatitis as COVID-19-related complications in a peritoneal dialysis patient.

Authors:  Alberto de Lorenzo Alvarez; Ángela Revilla; Teresa Corbalán; Ana Villar; Laura Espinel; Judith Martins; Alfonso Cubas
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.