OBJECTIVE: To identify urodynamic predictors for de novo overactive bladder (OAB) after single-incision sling implantation. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed women with pure, urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence, without OAB, between 2008 and 2015, in a university hospital. De novo OAB was investigated during clinical interviews. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were analyzed; 21 patients with de novo OAB were considered as group A while 171 control patients formed group B. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with de novo OAB have the first desire to void at a lower bladder volume (124 mL versus 160 mL, P = 0.0052), smaller maximum cystometric capacity (357 mL versus 406 mL, P = 0.0061), lower maximum flow (17 mL/s versus 23 mL/s, P = 0.0006), and higher bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI; -11 versus -23, P = 0.0022) compared with controls. According to multivariate analysis, maximum cystometric capacity (parameter estimate [PE] =0.008, P = 0.04) and BOOI (PE = -0.029, P = 0.01) were independent urodynamic predictors of de novo OAB. The final model showed good predictive accuracy (area under the curve =0.81). CONCLUSION: The present study identified maximum cystometric capacity and BOOI as independent predictors of de novo overactive bladder after single-incision sling implantation. Therefore, preoperative urodynamics may be useful to improve preoperative counseling and to tailor surgical treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To identify urodynamic predictors for de novo overactive bladder (OAB) after single-incision sling implantation. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed women with pure, urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence, without OAB, between 2008 and 2015, in a university hospital. De novo OAB was investigated during clinical interviews. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were analyzed; 21 patients with de novo OAB were considered as group A while 171 control patients formed group B. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with de novo OAB have the first desire to void at a lower bladder volume (124 mL versus 160 mL, P = 0.0052), smaller maximum cystometric capacity (357 mL versus 406 mL, P = 0.0061), lower maximum flow (17 mL/s versus 23 mL/s, P = 0.0006), and higher bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI; -11 versus -23, P = 0.0022) compared with controls. According to multivariate analysis, maximum cystometric capacity (parameter estimate [PE] =0.008, P = 0.04) and BOOI (PE = -0.029, P = 0.01) were independent urodynamic predictors of de novo OAB. The final model showed good predictive accuracy (area under the curve =0.81). CONCLUSION: The present study identified maximum cystometric capacity and BOOI as independent predictors of de novo overactive bladder after single-incision sling implantation. Therefore, preoperative urodynamics may be useful to improve preoperative counseling and to tailor surgical treatment.