Literature DB >> 33250386

Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in two nicotine concentrations compared to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and comparator electronic nicotine delivery system.

Nicholas I Goldenson1, August R Buchhalter2, Erik M Augustson3, Mark L Rubinstein3, Dennis Van Hoof3, Jack E Henningfield2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the abuse liability of the JUUL System (JS) in 5.0 % (59 mg/mL) and 3.0 % (35 mg/mL) nicotine concentrations.
METHODS: Adult smokers (N = 146; 45.9 % female; mean age = 41.29 years) were randomized to one of four study flavor arms and then to a within-subjects cross-over sequence for five test product categories: (1) JS 5.0 % nicotine concentration; (2) JS 3.0 % nicotine; (3) usual brand (UB) cigarette; (4) 4 mg mint nicotine gum; (5) comparator ENDS (VUSE Alto 5.0 % nicotine). Products were tested by ad libitum use (5 min for ENDS and cigarette; 30 min for gum); nicotine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and subjective effects were assessed following use.
RESULTS: Maximum plasma nicotine concentration (Cmax-BL), rate of plasma nicotine rise and total nicotine exposure (AUC0-60-BL) of UB cigarette were significantly greater than all other test products. The comparator ENDS was significantly greater than 5.0 % and 3.0 % JS and nicotine gum on Cmax-BL, rate of plasma nicotine rise, and AUC0-60-BL; Cmax-BL of JS 5.0 % was significantly greater than JS 3.0 % and nicotine gum. Product liking and satisfying effects were significantly highest for the UB cigarette; JS products and comparator ENDS did not significantly differ and were rated higher than nicotine gum on most subjective measures.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the abuse liability of both 5.0 % and 3.0 % JS is: (1) substantially lower than UB cigarette; (2) somewhat lower than comparator ENDS; and (3) higher than nicotine gum. Additionally, the abuse liability of JS 5.0 % is somewhat higher than JS 3.0 %.
Copyright © 2020 Juul Labs, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abuse liability; Cigarette; Electronic nicotine delivery system; JUUL; Nicotine; Pharmacokinetics; Subjective effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33250386     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  4 in total

1.  A randomised, crossover, clinical study to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of the BIDI® stick ENDS compared with combustible cigarettes and a comparator ENDS in adult smokers.

Authors:  Ian M Fearon; Karin Gilligan; Ryan G N Seltzer; Willie McKinney
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Trajectories of Nicotine Use Leading to Dual and Cyclical Tobacco Product Use in Young Adults.

Authors:  Afton Kechter; Kelsey A Simpson; Rachel Carmen Ceasar; Sara J Schiff; Naosuke Yamaguchi; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Sabrina L Smiley; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.825

Review 3.  Nicotine delivery and cigarette equivalents from vaping a JUULpod.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; Erin A Vogel; Neal Benowitz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.953

4.  An abuse liability assessment of the glo tobacco heating product in comparison to combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy.

Authors:  George Hardie; Nathan Gale; Michael McEwan; Stefano Milleri Oscar; Luigi Ziviani; Christopher J Proctor; James Murphy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.